Capture of decisions and emotional aspects in the oldness.
Main Article Content
Abstract
In decision-making, not only cognitive processes such as executive function and memory are involved, but emotional processes also intervene. In this research, the emotional aspects involved in the decision making of older people are defined. In particular, the location of the sources of the emotional process, the somatic marker, the reasoned emotion, the intuition and the emotional evaluation model of decision making are described. The contents discussed are based on Damasio’s emotional theory.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Aguado, L. (2002). Procesos cognitivos y sistemas cerebrales de la emoción. Revista de neurología, 34(12), 1161-1170.
Aguado, L. (2014). Emoción, afecto y motivación: Alianza Editorial.
Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1), 7-15.
Beer, J., John, O., Scabini, D., & Knight, R. (2006). Orbitofrontal cortex and social behavior: integrating self-monitoring and emotion-cognition interactions. Journal of cognitive neuroscience, 18(6), 871-879.
Brose, A., De Roover, K., Ceulemans, E., & Kuppens, P. (2015). Older adults’ affective experiences across 100 days are less variable and less complex than younger adults’. Psychology and aging, 30(1), 194.
Damasio, A. R., Grabowski, T. J., Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Ponto, L., Parvizi, J., & Hichwa, R. (2000). Subcortical and cortical brain activity during the feeling of self-generated emotions. Nature neuroscience, 3(10), 1049-1056.
Dancy, J. (2014). Intuition and emotion. Ethics, 124(4), 787-812.
Grühn, D., Sharifian, N., & Chu, Q. (2016). The limits of a limited future time perspective in explaining age differences in emotional functioning. Psychology and aging, 31(6), 583.
Hess, U., Landmann, H., David, S., & Hareli, S. (2017). The bidirectional relation of emotion perception and social judgments: the effect of witness’ emotion expression on perceptions of moral behaviour and vice versa. Cognition and Emotion, 1-14.
Immordino-Yang, M. H., Yang, X. F., & Damasio, H. (2016). Cultural modes of expressing emotions influence how emotions are experienced.
Isaacowitz, D., & Riediger, M. (2011). When age matters: Developmental perspectives on “cognition and emotion”. Cognition & emotion, 25(6), 957-967.
Márquez, M., Salguero, P., Paíno, S., & Alameda, J. R. (2013). La hipótesis del Marcador Somático y su nivel de incidencia en el proceso de toma de decisiones. REMA Revista electrónica de metodología aplicada, 18(1), 17-36.
Niedenthal, P., & Ric, F. (2017). Psychology of emotion: Psychology Press.
Palacios, E., Paíno, S. G., & Alameda, J. R. (2010). Programa Cartas. Descargado:http://www.telecable.es/personales/elias.palacios/CartasSetup. jar.
Plonsker, R., Gavish Biran, D., Zvielli, A., & Bernstein, A. (2017). Cognitive fusion and emotion differentiation: does getting entangled with our thoughts dysregulate the generation, experience and regulation of emotion? Cognition and Emotion, 31(6), 1286-1293.
Trevors, G., Kendeou, P., & Butterfuss, R. (2017). Emotion Processes in Knowledge Revision. Discourse Processes, 1-21.
Wright, R., & Rakow, T. (2017). Don’t sweat it: Re-examining the somatic marker hypothesis using variants of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task. Decision, 4(1), 52.