Does the development of ran depend on the age of the beginning of reading learning process?

Main Article Content

Roberta Ceccato
Lorena Caballero-Gascón
Olga Fernandez-García
Isabel Chaves
María Dolores Gil- Llario

Abstract

Background: The ability of the student to quickly name familiar stimuli (RAN) is a factor involved in reading performance that can be evaluated indiscriminately throughout the first years of schooling. The objectiveof this study, then, is to analyze if the acquisition of this ability depends on variables related to an early initiation to the reading-writing or if its development is related to factors of chronological maturity. Method: To this end, the RAN test was applied to 71 6-7 years old children from Croatia (culture in which the initiation to reading is later); to 44 4-5 years old Spanish children (equating the two groups by age of beginning of the reading-writing) and to 43 6-7 years old Spanish children (equating the two groups by chronological age). The results show that by comparing the group of Croatian children with the group of Spanish children aged 4-5 years, significant differences stand out in the appointment times of the stimuli of the 4 different components of the test. Older children recognize numbers and letters more quickly while younger ones take longer in these stimuli, recognizing objects and colors more quickly. However, comparing the two groups of children aged 6-7 years (Croatians and Spanish), no statistically significant differences were found. It is concluded that the development of the RAN is characterized by an earlier acquisition of nonsymbolic stimuli (objects-colors) than symbolic stimuli (letters-numbers) and that this acquisition is related more to factors of chronological maturity than of age of beginning of the reading-writing. This ability, therefore, despite being closely related to the learning of reading and writing, seems to develop independently of the age at which such learning begins.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ceccato, R., Caballero-Gascón, L., Fernandez-García, O., Chaves, I., & Gil- Llario, M. D. (2018). Does the development of ran depend on the age of the beginning of reading learning process?. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 4(1), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2018.n1.v4.1288
Section
Articles

References

Araújo, S., Inácio, F., Francisco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2011). Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 242–255. doi: 10.1002/dys.433

Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2014, October 20). Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 1-16.

Cooper, H. M. (2010). Research syn thesis and meta - analysis: Astep - by step approach (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Cunningham, A. E. (2006). Accounting for children’s orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 56–77.

Cutting, L. E., & Denckla, M. B. (2001). The relationship of serial rapid naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing, 14, 673–705. doi:10.1023/A:1012047622541

Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.453

Kirby, J. R., Roth, L., Desrochers, A., & Lai, S. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49, 103–110. doi:10.1037/07085591.49.2.103

Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). See Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the logitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129–157. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0302_3

Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2011). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.

Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136. doi:10.1007/s11881-998-0006-5

Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256. doi:10.1177/002221940203500306

Schatschneider, C., Fletcher, J. M., Francis, D. J., Carlson, C. D., & Foorman, B. R. (2004). Kindergarten prediction of reading skills: A longitudinal comparative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 265–282. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.265

Vaessen, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Long-term cognitive dynamics of fluent reading development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105, 213–231. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.005

Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827– 842. doi:10.1037/a0019465

Vaessen, A., Gerretsen, P ., & Blomert, L. (2009). Naming problems do not reflect a second independent core deficit in dyslexia: Double déficits explored. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 202–221. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.12.004

Wolf, M., & Bowers, P . G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415

Wolf, M., Bowers, P . G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407. doi:10.1177/002221940003300409

Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P ., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43–72. doi:10.1023/A:1013816320290