Acceptance and social influence between equals in primary education children. Implications of linguistic and persuasion skills.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Persuasion is a speech act that consists in using language to get the persuaded to adopt a belief or attitude that leads him to perform some action, for his own benefit (selfish persuasion) or the persuaded (prosocial). Thus, persuasive skills place children in different positions of acceptance and social influence among peers. Objetives. Analyze the prosocial and selfish persuasive ability (variety, quality and valence of the arguments) in primary school children; and its relationship with linguistic competence and acceptance and social influence among peers. Method. A sociometric questionnaire, the PPVT-III test and two tasks of persuasive production (selfish and prosocial) were administered to 103 children aged 6 to 12 years. Results. Linguistic competence favors the quality of persuasive arguments (not their variety or valence), both in prosocial and selfish persuasion; and the ability to selfishly convince others to do something is related to greater acceptance and social influence. Conclusions. The results provide clues to the design of educational activities through which school children experience the effects of prosocial persuasion, to be included in education plans for coexistence.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Andreou, E. (2000). Bully/victim problems and their association with psychological constructs in 8 to 12 year old Greek schoolchildren. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 26(1), 49-56.
Andreou, E. (2004). Bully/victim problems and their association with Machiavellianism and self efficacy in Greek primary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(2), 297-309.
Bartsch, K. y London, K. (2000). Children's use of mental state information in persuasion. Developmental Psychology, 36(3), 352-365.
Bartsch, K., Cole, J. y Estes, D. (2010). Young Children s Persuasion in Everyday Conversation: Tactics and Attunement to Others Mental States. Social Development, 19(2), 394-416.
Bartsch, K., London, K. y Campbell, M.D. (2007). Children`s attention to beliefs in interactive persuasion tasks. Developmental Psychology, 43, 111-120.
Cassidy, K. W., Werner, R. S., Rourke, M., Zubernis, L. S. y Balaraman, G. (2003). The relationship between psychological understanding and positive social behaviors. Social Development, 12 (2), 198-221.
Coie, J. D., Dodge, K. A y Coppotelli, H. (1982). Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. Developmental psychology, 18(4), 557.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M. y Arribas, D. (2006). Test de Vocabulario en Imágenes Peabody III (PPVTIII; Madrid: TEA.
Gasser, L y Keller, M. (2009). Are the competent the morally good? Perspective taking and moral motivation of children involved in bullying. Social Development, 18(4), 798-816.
González, J. y García-Bacete, F. J. (2010). Sociomet. Programa para la realización de estudios sociométricos. Madrid: TEA.
Happé, F. G. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding of story characters’ thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped, and normal children and adults. Journal of autism and Developmental disorders, 24(2), 129-154.
Hawley (2003) Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of experimental child psychology, 85(3), 213-235.
Hughes, C. y Leekman, S. (2004). What are the links between theory of mind and social relations? Review, reflections, and new directions for studies of typical and atypical development. Social Development, 13, 590-619.
Paal, T y Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and individual differences, 43(3), 541-551.
Repacholi, B., Slaughter, V. Pritchard, M. y Gibbs, V. (2003). Theory of mind, Machiavellism, and social functioning in childhood. In B. Repacholi, y V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind, Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science. Hove, E. Sussex: Psychology Press (99-120).
Slaughter, V., (2011). Early adoptions of Machiavellian attitudes: Implications for children`s interpersonal relationships. American Psychological Assotiation, 177-192.
Slaughter, V y Pritchard, M. (2000). Determining peer acceptance amongst preschool children. Unpublished manuscript, University of Queensland.
Slaughter, V., Peterson, C. y Moore, C. (2013). I Can Talk You Into It: Theory of Mind and Persuasion Behavior in Young Children. Developmental Psychology, 49(2), 227-231.
Sutton, J y Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70(3), 443-456.
To, C., Yim, S., Lam, G. y Iao, L. (2016). Persuasion in Chinese School-Age Children With and Without Autism Spectrum Disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(3), 231-240.