Assessment systems and teaching methodologies and their incidence in generic competences (EMICOG-TEACHERS)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The proliferation of synchronous web tools and applications, learning management systems, massive open online courses and constant changes characteristic of the so-called information society (IS), have meant that the main challenge for university teaching staff
be its capacity for adaptation and innovation. In this sense, the present communication describes the design of an online ad hoc instrument, EMICOG - teacher version, designed through the SurveyMonkey tool. With it, we intend to study the teaching methodologies applied in the various subjects taught by the teachers of the Universidad de la Costa (Colombia), the forms of assessment or evaluation of the transversal activities carried out as well as their teaching practices through the analysis of six sections: i) general data, ii) instructional strategies and techniques, iii) resources used in the evaluation and teaching of the subject, iv) psychoeducational variables, v) training needs, and vi) teaching processes. It has been applied to 182 university teachers, with the purpose of studying to what extent these teaching actions can affect better results of generic competences in the national tests Saber Pro and in the role of psychoeducational variables of the students, thus becoming an
instrument of empowerment and improvement of the teaching quality and academic results, through the clarification and the delimitation of training needs, which will be the basis of future instructional programs / courses of efficient strategies for the improvement of teaching that will impact on obtaining higher academic achievements. It is a Competitive Research Project CONV-ÍNDEX Num. 13-2018, INV Project Code. 150-01-007-13 Universidad de la Costa (Colombia) - University of León (Spain). Evaluated by the ACAC (MEN Colombia).
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Almerich, G., Orellana, N., y Díaz-García, I. (2015). Las competencias en TIC en el profesorado en formación y su relación con las creencias pedagógicas, la autoeficacia y la percepción de impacto de las TIC en la educación. En AIDIPE (Ed.), Investigar con y para la sociedad (Vol. 2, pp. 589- 597). Cádiz, España: Bubok. Recuperado de http://aidipe2015.aidipe.org
Arias, D. H., Díaz, O. C., Garzón, I., León, A. C., Rodríguez, S. P., y Valbuena, E. O. (2018). Entre las exigencias de calidad y las condiciones de desigualdad: Formación inicial de profesores en
Colombia. Bogotá: UPN.
Barnet, R. (2001). Los límites de la competencia. El conocimiento, la educación superior y la sociedad. Barcelona: Gedisa.
Calderón, A., Parra, C. A., y Piñeros, M. A. (2018). Guía de orientación Saber Pro: Módulos de competencias genéricas. Bogotá, Colombia: Instituto Colombiano para la Evaluación de la Educación
(Icfes).
CUC. (2018). Autoinforme de Acreditación. Barranquilla: CUC
Daumiller, M., Dickhäuser, O., y Dresel, M. (2019). University instructors’ achievement goals for teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(1), 131-148. doi: 10.1037/edu0000271
De la Paz, S., Monte-Sano, C., Felton, M., Croninger, R., Jackson, C., y Worland Piantedosi, K. (2016). A historical writing apprenticeship for adolescents: integrating disciplinary learning with cognitive strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(1), 31-52. doi: 10.1002/rrq.147
Díaz-Flórez, O. C. (2018). Las competencias en la educación superior. Debates contemporáneos. Tesis Doctoral. Bogotá: UPN
García-Martín J., y García-Martín, S. (2018). Los MOOCS: Estado de la cuestión y propuesta educativa. En E. López-Meneses, D. Cobos Sanchiz, A. H. Martín Padilla, L. Molina García y A. Jaén Martínez (Eds.). Experiencias pedagógicas e innovación educativa: Aportaciones desde la praxis docente e investigadora (pp. 2935-2942). Barcelona: Octaedro.
García-Martín, J., Merchant, G., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2016). Preparing to teach 21 st Century literacies. En C. Kosnik, S. White, C. Beck, B. Marshall, A. L. Goodwin y J. Murray (Eds.). Building
Bridges. Rethinking Literacy Teacher Education in a Digital Era (pp. 43 - 55). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers
García-Martín, J., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2018). The instructional effectiveness of two virtual approaches: processes and product. Journal of Psychodidactics, 23(2), 117-127. doi: 10.1016/j.psicod.2018.02.002
García-Martín, J., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2013). Patterns of web 2.0 tool use among young Spanish people. Computers and Education, 67(3), 105-120. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.03.003
García-Martín, J., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2015). Use of Facebook, Tuenti, Twitter and Myspace among young Spanish people. Behaviour & Information Technology, 34(7), 685-703. doi:
1080/0144929X.2014.993428
García-Martín, J., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ perceptions of the competence dimensions of digital literacy and of psychological and educational measures. Computers
& Education, 107, 54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.010
García-Martín, J., y García-Sánchez, J. N. (2019). Promoción de las competencias para la vida a través de la gamificación en un MOOC. En D. Padilla Góngora, J. M. Aguilar Parra y R. López Liria
(Eds.). Salud y ciclo vital (pp. 289-296). Madrid: Editorial DYKINSON.
Gargallo-López, B., Suárez-Rodríguez, J., Garfella-Esteban, P. R., y Fernández-March, A. (2011). El cuestionario CEMEDEPU. Un instrumento para la evaluación de la metodología docente y evaluativa de los profesores universitarios. Estudios sobre Educación, 21, pp. 9-40.
Gonzales, M. C. (2013). Influencia de la autoeficacia docente colectiva en el profesorado universitario. Psicología Educativa, 3-12. doi: 10.5093/ed2013a2
Gonzales, M. C. (2018). Construcción de la escala de autoeficacia docente colectiva del profesorado universitario. Revista Espacios, 39(52), 30-38.
González, S. y Triviño, M. A. (2018). Las estrategias didácticas en la práctica docente universitaria. Profesorado. Revista de curriculum y formación del profesorado, 22(2), 371-388. doi:
30827/profesorado.v22i2.7728
Graham, S. (2018). A revised writer(s)-within-community model of writing. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 258-279. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2018.1481406
Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B. Ng, C., Harris, K. R., Aitken, A., Barkel, A., Kavanauge, C., y Talukdar, J. (2018). Reading for writing: a meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions on writing. Review of Educational Research, 88(2), 243–284. doi: 10.3102/0034654317746927
Graham, S., Liu, X., Ng, C., Bartlett, B., Harris, K. R., y Kavanauge, C. (2018). Effectiveness of literacy programs balancing reading and writing instruction: a meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(3), 279–304. doi: 10.1002/rrq.194
Halamish, V. (2018) Pre-service and In-service teachers’ metacognitive knowledge of learning dtrategies. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(2152), pp. 1-5. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.20 18.02152
Hatlevik, I. K. R., y Hatlevik, O. E. (2018). Examining the relationship between teachers’ ICT self-efficacy for educational purposes, collegia collaboration, lack of facilitation and the use of ICT in teaching practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(935), pp. 1-8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00935
Hew, K. F., y Cheung W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45-58. doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.05.001
Lai, H.-M., Hsiao, Y-L., y Hsieh, P-J. (2018). The role of motivation, ability, and opportunity in university teachers’ continuance use intention for flipped teaching. Computers & Education, 124,
-50. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.05.013
Liaw, S. S., y Huang, H. S. (2013). Perceived satisfaction, perceived usefulness and interactive learning environments as predictors to self-regulation in e-learning environments. Computers & Education, 60, 14-24. doi: 10.1016/j. compedu.2012.07. 01
Lin, W. S. (2012). Perceived fit and satisfaction on web learning performance: IS continuance intention and task-technology fit perspectives. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70, 498-507. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012 .01.006
Montanares, E. G., y Junod, P. A. (2018). Creencias y prácticas de enseñanza de profesores universitarios en Chile. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 20(1), 93-103. doi: 10.24320/redie.2018.20.1.1383
OECD. (2016). La educación en Colombia. MEC: OECD. Recuperado de: https://www.mineducacion. gov.co/1759/articles-356787_recurso_1.pdf
Perandones, T. M., Herrera, L., y Lledó, A. (2013). Felicidad subjetiva y autoeficacia docente en profesorado de República Dominicana y España. European Journal of Investigation in Health,
Psychology and Education, 3(3), 277-288. doi: 10.1989/ejihpe.v3i3.50
Pfitzner-Eden, F. (2016). Why Do I Feel More Confident? Bandura’s Sources Predict Preservice Teachers’ Latent Changes in Teacher Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(1486), pp. 1-16.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01486
Tesouro, M., Corominas, E., Teixidó, J., y Puiggalí, J. (2014). La autoeficacia docente e investigadora
del profesorado universitario: relación con su estilo docente e influencia en sus concepciones sobre el nexo docencia-investigación. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 32 (1), 169-186. doi: 10.6018/rie.32.1.172771
Torrijos, P., Martín, J. F., y Rodríguez, M. J. (2018). La educación emocional en la formación permanente del profesorado no universitario. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del
profesorado, 22(1), 579-597.
Zhao, H., y Zhang, X. (2017). The influence of field teaching practice on Pre-service Teachers’ Professional Identity: A Mixed Methods Study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1264), 1-11. doi:
3389/fpsyg.2017.01264