The use of the bee-bot robot as a learning tool for emotions in the teaching of students with autism spectrum disorder

Main Article Content

Elena Pérez Vázquez
Gonzalo Lorenzo Lledó
Asunción Lledó Carreres
Alejandro Lorenzo Lledó
Alba Gilabert Cerdá

Abstract

The Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) have experimented in this last decade a great expansion (Ferreyra, Méndez and Rodrigo, 2009). In this sense, ICTs have been progressively incorporated in schools acting as a resource at the service of an inclusive
school. This school aims to respond to all students in the center, with special emphasis on students with Specific Educational Support Needs (Arnaiz, 2013). Specifically, among these students we find the student body with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Following the 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (American Psychiatric Association, 2013), TEA is a developmental disorder characterized by deficits in two areas: (1) social interaction and communication and (2) repetitive patterns of behaviors, interests, and activities. The ample demand for resources on the part of teaching teams to achieve a quality teaching process for students with TEA (Kim et al., 2018) and the characteristics of ICT that are perfectly aligned with the methodological principles that should guide the teaching-learning process of these students, make their use experience exponential growth in this context. Among the different types of ICT implemented with these students we can find robotics (Dielh, Schmitt, Villano and Crowell, 2012). The use of this technology has increased in the last 20 years as a consequence of the increase in research that supports robotics as a potentially effective tool for children with ASD (Dielh et al., 2018). In this sense, robots have permitted the creation of simple and controlled learning environments (Josman et al., 2018), reducing the anxiety that can cause them. However, although most studies show positive effects (Goodrich et al., 2012; Huskens et al., 2013; Yun, Choi and Park, 2015), most of these studies have methodological limitations and have exploratory character due to the low number of participants involved. Likewise, the use of robots is limited by the large costs that must be assumed by schools and by the lack of availability of these devices (Alexander et al., 2011). In this sense, the use of robots in educational contexts is limited. Thus, the purpose of the study has been to perform an intervention for the understanding, recognition and expression of emotions with the use of the Bee-Bot robot, an affordable robot for schools. Through a mixed methodology by means of a case study, 10 students between the ages of 5 and 18, belonging to a Specific Communication and Language Unit (UECYL), have participated. This classroom belongs to a school of Infant and Primary Education  of Alicante. The instrument used has been a pretest-postest with different dimensions. The results of the present research indicate that the students present a quite remarkable evolution in the learning of basic emotions, as well as in aspects related to programming and spatial orientation. To conclude, we can say that robotics is a tool with a strong impact on the socio-emotional intervention of students with TEA, creating simple scenarios in which to learn and practice different skills. This work is part of the research line of the research group of the University of Alicante IncluTic (VIRGROB- 321).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pérez Vázquez, E., Lorenzo Lledó, G., Lledó Carreres, A., Lorenzo Lledó, A., & Gilabert Cerdá, A. (2019). The use of the bee-bot robot as a learning tool for emotions in the teaching of students with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 3(1), 577–584. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v3.1643
Section
Articles

References

American Psychiatric Association. (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. Arington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.

Aresti-Bartolome, N., & Garcia-Zapirain, B. Technologies as support tools for persons with autistic spectrum disorder: A systematic review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 11, 7767–7802, 2014.

Arnaiz, P. (2013). Educación Inclusiva: una escuela para todos. Ed. Aljibe

Blumberg, S.J., Bramlett, M.D., Kogan, M.D., Schieve, L.A. Jones, J.R. & Lu, M.C. (2013). Changes in prevalence of parent-reported autism spectrum disorder in school-aged U.S. children: 2007 to 2011-2012. National Health Statistics Reports, 65(20), 1–12.

Diehl, J.J., Schmitt, L.M., Villano, M., & Crowell, C.R. (2012). The clinical use of robots for individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: A critical review. Research in autism spectrum disorders, 6(1), 249-262.

Ferreyra, J.A., Méndez, A., & Rodrigo, M.A. (2009) El uso de las TIC en la Educación Especial: Descripción de un sistema informático para niños discapacitados visuales en Etapa Preescolar. Revista Iberoamericana de Tecnología en Educación y Educación en Tecnología, 3, 55-62.

Goodrich, M.A., Colton, M., Brinton, B., Fujiki, M., Alan Atherton, J., Robinson, L., Acerson, A. (2012). Incorporating a robot into an autism therapy team. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 27(2), 52.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2012.40

Hillman, H. (2018). Child-Centered Play Therapy as an Intervention for Children With Autism: A Literature Review. International Journal of Play Therapy, vol. 27(4), 198-204.

Huskens, B., Verschuur, R., Gillesen, J., Didden, R., & Barakova, E. (2013). Promoting questionasking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 16(5), 345-356.

Josman, N., Ben-Chaim, H., Friedrich, H., & Weiss P.(2008). Effectiveness of virtual reality for teaching street-crossing skills to children and adolescents with autism. Int J Disabil Hum Dev, 7, 49–56.

Ke, F., & Im, T. (2013).Virtual-reality-based social interaction training for children with highfunctioning autism. J. Educ. Res., 106(6), 441–46.

Kim, E.S., Berkovits, L.D., Bernier, E.P., Leyzberg, D., Shic, F., Paul, R. & Scassellati, B. (2013). Social robots as embedded reinforces of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43, 1038–1049.

Kozima, H., Michalowski, M.P., & Nakagawa, C. (2009). A playful robot for research therapy and entertainment. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1(1), 3-18.

Makrygianni, M. K., Gena, A., Katoudi, S., y Galanis, P. (2018). The effectiveness of applied behavior analytic interventions for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A meta-analytic study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 51, 18-31.

McGill, RJ., Baker, D., & Busse, R. T. (2015). Social Story™ interventions for decreasing challenging behaviours: a singlecase meta-analysis 1995–2012. Educational Psychology in Practice, 31(1), 21-42.

Michaud, F., Salter, T., Duquette A., & Laplante, J.F. (2007). Perspectives on mobile robots used as tools for pediatric rehabilitation. Assistive Technology, 19, pp.14-29.

Pinel, V., Rendon, L.A ., and Adrover-Roig, D. (2018). Los robots sociales como promotores de la comunicación en los Trastornos del Espectro Autista (TEA). Let. Hoje, 53(1), 39-47.

http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1984-7726.2018.1.28920

Salter, T., Michaud F., & Larouche, H. (2010). How wild is wild? A taxonomy to categorize the wildness of child-robot interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics, 2(4), pp.405-415.

Sanz-Cervera, P., Fernández-Andrés, M. I., Pastor-Cerezuela, G., y Tárraga-Mínguez, R. (2018). Efectividad de las intervenciones basadas en metodología TEACCH en el trastorno del espectro

autista: un estudio de revisión. Papeles del Psicólogo, 39(1), 40-50.

Scasellati, B., Admoni, H., & Mataric, M. (2012). Robots for use in autism research. Annu. Rev.Biomed.Eng, 14, 275-294.

Schieve, L.A., Rice, C., Devine, O., Maenner, M.J. Lee, L.C., Fitzgerald, R., Wingate, M.S., D. Schendel, S. Pettygrove, K. van Naarden Braun. (2011). Have secular changes in perinatal risk

factors contributed to the recent autism prevalence increase? Development and application of a mathematical assessment model. Annals of Epidemiology, 21(12),930-945.

Tárraga- Mínguez R., & Sanz-Cervera, P. (2018). ¿Qué estrategias de intervención funcionan en la educación de los niños con trastorno del espectro autista? Revisión de evidencias en la literatura científica. Reidocrea, 7(22), 279-287.