Lifelong learning and teachers’ self-effectiviness
Main Article Content
Abstract
Effective teachers should believe in his or her capability to strongly influence students’ performance and learning methods, even among those students who may be difficult or unmotivated (Guskey and Passaro, 1994). Self-efficacy enhances motivation, affects the amount of effort and persistence that a person devotes to a task and, on workplace environment, improves job satisfaction. By examining the relationship between selfefficacy and the continuous teacher’s training, this paper’s overall aim is to demonstrate how attending training courses, post-graduate diplomas or master’s degrees helps to increase teachers’ sense of efficacy. Moreover, the impact of precariousness on self-efficacy will be analyzed going through the variables influencing teachers’ perceived self-efficacy.
This research is based on 225 Italian teachers, who filled out an online research protocol which includes the following measurement scales: School Self-Efficacy Scale (Borgogni, Petitta, Steca, 2001), School Perceived Collective Efficacy Scale (Borgogni, Petitta, Steca, 2001), Schwarzer Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale in its Italian adaptation by Lucio Sibilia, Ralf Schwarzer and Matthias Jerusalem (1995), Job Satisfaction Questionnaire developed by Weiss et al. (1967) adapted and validated in Italian by Di Nuovo and Alba (1990), Survey of Perceived Organizational Support of Eisenberg et al. (1986) adapted and validated in Italian by Battistelli and Mariani in 2011, Organizational Commitment and Employee Engagement Scale by Barbaranelli and Fida (2004).
Results show that teachers who have attended training courses and masters during the last three years, have obtained significantly higher scores on School Self-Efficacy Scale than teachers who have not attended such courses; furthermore, school’s self-efficacy level is considerably higher among tenured teachers than in those who have fixed-term contracts. Moreover, a linear regression analyses reveals that school collective efficacy, generalized self-efficacy and employee engagement are all significant predictors of self-efficacy in school settings. In conclusion, since self-efficacy is also affected by collective efficacy, it is found necessary to focus the learning environment on collaborative and cooperative learning strategies that enhance the sense of belonging, organizational identification, internal and external communication.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Bandura, A. (2000). Autoefficacia: teoria e applicazioni. Trento: Erikson Editore.
Barbaranelli, C., Fida, R., Paciello, M., Di Giunta, L., Caprara, G. V. (2008). Assessing personality in early adolescence through self-report and other-ratings: A multitrait–multimethod analysis of the BFQ-C. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 876–886.
Bermann, P., McLaughlin, M., Bass, G., Pauly E., Zellman G. (1977). Federal programs supportino educational change. Vol. VII: Factor affecting implementation and continuation. Report R- 1589/7- HEW. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation.
Borgogni, L., Pettita, L., Steca, P. (2001). Efficacia personale e collettiva nei contesti organizzativi. In G.V. Caprara (Ed.). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Interventi e contesti culturali. Trento: Erickson.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Bishop, N. (1992). Instructional adaptation for students at risk. Journal of Educational Research, 86, 70-84.
Guskey, T., Passaro, P. (1994). Teacher efficacy: A study of construction dimensions. American Educational Research Journal, 311, p. 627- 643.
Meyer, H. (2007). Was ist guter unterricht? Berlino: Cornelsen Scriptor.
Multon, K., Brown, S., Lent, R. (1991). Relation of self-efficacy beliefs to academic outcomes: A meta- analytic investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38.
Noe, R.A., Hollenbeck, J.R., Gerhart, B., Wright, P.M. (2006). Gestione delle risorse umane. Milano: Apogeo.
OECD (2016). Risultati TALIS 2013: una prospettiva internazionale sull’insegnamento e sull’apprendimento. OECD Publishing. Retrieved September 3, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264251694-it
Parkay, F. W., Greenwood, G., Olejnik, S., Proller, N. (1988). A study of the relationship among Teacher burnout 241 teacher efficacy, locus of control, and stress. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21(4), 13–22.
Salvetti, F. (2013). Ambienti. In F. Amicucci, G. Gabrielli, (Ed.). Boundaryless learning. Nuove strategie e strumenti di formazione. Milano: Franco Angeli.
Santos, F.M., & Eisenhardrt, K.M. (2005). Organizational boundaries and teories of organization. Organization Science, n. 16, 491- 508.
Sibilia, L., Schwarzer, R., Jerusalem, M., (1995) Italian adaptation of the General Self-Efficacy Scale: self-efficacy generalized. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Weiss, J.M. (1991). Stress-induced depression: critical neurochemical and electrophysiological changes. In J. Madden, (ed.). Neurobiology of learning, emotion and affect. New York: Raven, pp. 123-154.