Socioemotional variables and mindfulness in happiness
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent decades, the study, both theoretical and empirical, on the assessment made by people in relation to the satisfaction they may feel about their life has gained special interest in order to discover, prevent and promote the variables and resources that affect the ability to have a full and happy life. In this line, from the perspective of Positive Psychology, a research with two fundamental objectives was proposed. On the one hand, to find out what socioemotional profile (Mental Molds, Constructive Thinking and Emotional Intelligence) underlies people who have participated in a Mindfulness program, and if these variables allow predicting the index of subjective well-being. On the other hand, to assess the impact of participation in a Mindfulness program on subjective well-being, not only in selfknowledge, but also in the establishment of interpersonal relationships. In the research, in which socioemotional variables and mindfulness are predictive variables and subjective well-being is the criterion variable, 117 university students with standardized normality parameters participated following actively a Mindfulness training program, of which 34 were men and 83 women. The results obtained, with the application of relevant tests and the appropriate statistical procedures of pretest and posttest measures, allow us to affirm that mindfulness competence and certain socioemotional variables (Global Constructive Thinking and Molds of Vital Spontaneity, Adjustment, and Optimization) correlate with significant statistical differences with subjective well-being and that, in addition, they allow their prediction. On the other hand, the high scores obtained in constructive thinking indicate that there is acceptance of oneself and others, which allows maintaining good interpersonal relationships and acting with coherence and assertiveness without making value judgments.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Atienza, F., Pons, D., Balaguer, I. y García, M. (2000). Propiedades psicométricas de la escala de satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Psicothema, 12, pp. 314-319.
DeNeve, JE., Diener, E., Tay, L., y Xuereb, C. (2013).Las ventajas objetivas de bienestar subjetivo.En JF Helliwell, R. Layard y J. Sachs (Eds.), World informe felicidad 2013.Volumen 2. (pp. 54-79). Red Soluciones de Desarrollo Sostenible de la ONU.
Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., &Oishi, S. (2018). Advances and open questions in thescience of subjectivewell-being. Collabra: Psychology, 4(1), 1-78. doi:10.1525/collabra.115.
Epstein, S. (2012). Manual: Inventario de pensamiento constructivo. Una medida de inteligencia emocional: TEA Ediciones.
Fernández – Berrocal, P., Extremera, N. y Ramos, N. (2004). Validity and realibility of theSpanishmodified versión of theTrail Meta–MoodScale. Psychologica lReports, 94, 751 – 755.
García, M.A. (2002). El bienestar subjetivo. Subjective well-being. Escritos de Psicología, 2002, 6, 18-39
Hernández (2000). Escala “BIS-HERNÁN” Test de bienestar individual subjetivo. Tafor Publicaciones.
Hernández_Guanir, P. (2010). Moldes. Test de estrategias cognitivas-emocionales. TEA Ediciones.
Kabat-Zinn, J. (2012). Vivir con plenitud las crisis. Cómo utilizar la sabiduría del cuerpo y de la mente para afrontar el estrés, el dolor y la enfermedad. Kairós.
Kong, F., You, X., &Zhao, J. (2017). Evaluation of the gratitudequestionnaire in a Chinesesample of adults: Factorial validity, criterion-relatedvalidity, and measurement invariance En N.Callejay T. Mason 2. Escala de Bienestar Subjetivo (EBS-20 y EBS-8): Construcción y Validación. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnóstico y Evaluación – e Avaliação Psicológica. RIDEP · Nº55 · Vol.2 · 185-201 · 2020
Martín, R., Luján, I. y Rodríguez-Mateo, H. (2015). Programa Mindfulness-ProAp en R. Martín, Perfil socioemocional de los que más se benefician de un programa Mindfulness. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.
Redorta, J. (2021). Cómo abordar los conflictos estructurales. Almuzara
Rodríguez-Fernández, A. y Goñi-Grandmontagne,A. (2011) La estructura tridimensional del bienestar subjetivo. Anales de psicología 2011, vol. 27, nº 2 (mayo), 327-332
Ryff, C.D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, Or Is It? Exploration sonthe Meaning od Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069 – 1081.
Ryff, C. D. y Reyes, L. M. (1995) The structure of psychological well-beingre visited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 710 – 727.
Seligman, M. y Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology. An Introdution. American Psychologist, 55, 5-14.
Siegel, D. J. (2010). Cerebro y Mindfulness. Paidós.
Simón, V. (2015). La compasión: el corazón del mindfulness. Editorial Sello