Conceptions about the positive functioning of middle-aged and elderly adults
Main Article Content
Abstract
Positive functioning in middle age and the elderly has been associated with a set of developmental characteristics and processes. In middle age, psychological adaptation was associated with generativity or reaching or maintaining professional satisfaction, while in the elderly it has been associated with acceptance and positive reflection on past and present life or active aging. Positive functioning has also been conceptualized in terms of subjective (positive affect, life satisfaction), psychological (self-acceptance, positive relationships, autonomy, environmental mastery, purpose in life, personal growth) and social (integration, contribution, coherence, actualization, acceptance) wellbeing. Authors also highlight social, socioeconomic and cultural differences in psychosocial adaptation. However, little is known about the personal conceptions of young people about the positive functioning of older people. Thus, the main objective of this study was to explore and compare the criteria of positive functioning of middleaged and elderly people, from the perspective of young people. A sample of university students answered a questionnaire, indicating characteristics of the positive functioning of four acquaintance persons (two middle-aged and two elderly) from their communities. A total of 434 descriptors of 55 middle-aged and 52 elderly people were generated and a content analysis was carried out considering theoretical categories of subjective, psychological and social well-being. A qualitative and quantitative analysis was then performed. Descriptors related to psychological well-being were more frequent than those related to subjective well-being, in both stages of life. There were no differences between middle age and elderly in terms of frequency of psychological well-being categories, but some subjective well-being categories were more frequently mentioned in one of the stages. Participants did not use social well-being descriptors. The results are discussed in the context of the literature on the subject.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Arnett, J. J. (2016). Does emerging adulthood theory apply across social classes? National data on a persistent question. Emerging adulthood, 4(4), 227-235.
Baltes, P. B., Lindenberger, U. & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Life Span Theory in Developmental Psychology. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner, Handbook of Child Psychology. Vol. I, Theoretical Models of Human Development (pp. 569-664). Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.
Bardin, L. (2008). Analise de Conteudo (5th Ed.). Lisboa: Edicoes 70.
Cabral, M. V., Ferreira, P.M., Silva, P.A., Jeronimo, P. & Marques, T. (2013). Processos de envelhecimento em Portugal: usos do tempo, redes sociais e condicoes de vida. Lisboa: Fundacao Francisco Manuel dos Santos.
Carlquist, E., Ulleberg, P., Delle Fave, A., Nafstad, H. E., & Blakar, R. M. (2017). Everyday understandings of happiness, good life, and satisfaction: Three different facets of well-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 12(2), 481-505.
Coleman, J. C. (2011). The nature of adolescence (4th Ed). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American Psychologist, 55, 34-43.
Douma, L., Steverink, N., Hutter, I., & Meijering, L. (2017). Exploring subjective well-being in older age by using participant-generated word clouds. The Gerontologist, 57(2), 229-239.
Durbrow, E. H., Pen, L. F., Masten, A., Sesma, A., & Williamson, I. (2001). Mothers’ conceptions of child competence in contexts of poverty: The Philippines, St Vincent, and the United States. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25(5), 438-443.
Erikson, E (1959). Identity and the Life Cycle. New York, N.Y.: Norton.
Havighurst, R. J. (1948). Developmental tasks and education. University of Chicago Press.
Karasawa, M., Curhan, K. B., Markus, H. R., Kitayama, S. S., Love, G. D., Radler, B. T., & Ryff, C. D. (2011). Cultural perspectives on aging and well-being: A comparison of Japan and the United States. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 73(1), 73-98.
Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social psychology quarterly, 61(2), 121-140.
Keyes, C. L., Shmotkin, D., & Ryff, C. D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: the empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 1007-1022.
Markus, H. R. & Kitayama, S. (2010). Cultures and selves. A cycle of mutual constitution. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(4), 420-430. DOI: 10.1177/1745691610375557
Masten, A. S., & Tellegen, A. (2012). Resilience in developmental psychopathology: Contributions of the project competence longitudinal study. Development and Psychopathology, 24(2), 345-361.
McAdams, D. P. (2006). The redemptive self: Generativity and the stories Americans live by. Research in human development, 3(2-3), 81-100.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069.
Sastre, M. T. M. (1999). Lay conceptions of well-being and rules used in well-being judgments among young, middle-aged, and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 47(2), 203-231.
Westerhof, G. J., Dittmann-Kohli, F., & Thissen, T. (2001). Beyond life satisfaction: Lay conceptions of well-being among middle-aged and elderly adults. Social Indicators Research, 56(2), 179-203.