Faculty and student satisfaction with quality in higher education

Article Sidebar

Revista INFAD. Número 1, volumen 2 de 2022
PDF (Español (España))
Published: Jul 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2022.n1.v2.2333
Keywords:
higher education teachers students quality satisfaction

Main Article Content

Laila Mohamed Mohand
Mª del Carmen Olmos Gómez
Mónica Luque Suárez

Abstract

From the perspective of the university as an organizational system. the achievement of qualityis determined both by individual actions and by the interaction of individuals with their organizational units. One of the objectives of higher education is to promote a quality teaching learning process. This work evaluates quality through the individual evaluation of teachers and students. The objective of this work is to know the level of individual satisfaction of teachers and students in relation to quality in higher education. For this purpose. a questionnaire was implemented to explore the strengths and weaknesses of students and faculty. The research was carried out in Spain and involved a total of 560 subjects, with a sample of 450 students and 110 teachers. A correlational study was carried out using Pearson’s correlation analysis. The main results show that the students value positively the school management of resources for teaching activities. the competencies pursued by the curriculum and the teachers value positively the educational collaboration of the school with other social institutions in the community. As a proposal for improvement. it is proposed to carry out an evaluation of the organizational units.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mohamed Mohand, L., Olmos Gómez, M. del C., & Luque Suárez, M. (2022). Faculty and student satisfaction with quality in higher education. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 2(1), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2022.n1.v2.2333
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2022): MEETING WITH SCIENCE. A REFLECTION ON THE UNIVERSITY
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Arnaz, J.A. y Yurén, T. (1994). Docencia. Serie documentos. México: CETYS.

Coelho, J.G. y Vásquez-Rizo, F.E. (2008). Del otro lado de la pizarra: Relación estudiante-profesor desde perspectivas disciplinares. Revista de. Educación, 11, 103-126.

Cortés, E., Campos, M. y Moreno, M.P. (2014). Priorización de las dimensiones de evaluación al desempeño docente por el estudiante, en tres áreas del conocimiento. Formación Universitaria, 7, 3-10.

Frechtling, J.A. (2007). Logic modelling methods in program evaluation. San Francisco. CA:Jossey-Bass.

Gibbs, G. y Coffey, M. (2000).Capacitación para enseñar en la educación superior: una agenda de investigación. Enseñanza en la educación superior, 4, 31-44.

Grönros,C. (1984).Un modelo de calidad de servicio y sus implicaciones de marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 18, 36-44.

Joseph, M. y Joseph, B. (1997). Service quality in education: a student perspective. Quality Assurance in Education, 5, 15-21.

Marzo, M. y Pedraja, P. (2005). Un Nuevo Elemento de Gestión para las Universidades: Satisfacción con los Cursos Ofertados. Revista Internacional de Gestión Educativa, 19, 505-526.

Moreno, M. P., Nava, M. C. y Campos, M. (2014). Los comentarios abiertos como referente de evaluación de la docencia universitaria: la conveniencia de su interpretación y tratamiento. Formación universitaria, 7, 41-48.

Olmos-Gómez, M. D. C., Luque Suarez, M., Ferrara, C. & Olmedo-Moreno, E. M. (2020). Quality of Higher Education through the Pursuit of Satisfaction with a Focus on Sustainability. Sustainability, 12(6), 2366-2376. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062366

Prieto, J. H. (2014). Elaboración y validación de un instrumento para la medición del desempeño docente basado en competencias. Revista de Docencia Universitaria, 12, 231-250.

Rizo Moreno, H. E. (2004). Evaluación del profesor universitario. Una visión institucional. Revista Iberoamericana de Educación, 34, 578-697.

Tirado, F., Miranda, A. y Sánchez, A. (2007). La evaluación como proceso de legitimidad: La opinión de los alumnos. Reporte de una experiencia. Revista Perfeccionamiento Educativo, 29, 7-24.

Trigwell, K., Martin, E., Benjamin, J. & Prosser, M. (2000). Scholarship of teaching: a model. Higher Education Research & Development, 19,155-168.

Vásquez-Rizo, F. E. y Gabalán-Coello, J. (2009). Del otro lado de la pizarra: relación estudiante-profesor desde perspectivas disciplinares. Educación y Educadores, 11, 205-217