Sexting in college students: behaviors and motivations considering couple’s situation
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the last decade, sexting has emerged as an increasingly common practice in the expression of sexuality, especially among adolescence and youth. Progressively, this trend has become significantly integrated into people’s social and romantic interactions, regardless of whether they’re in a stable relationship or not, leading to both opportunities and challenges, as well as risks, in terms of privacy, consent and health. The aim of the study was to analyse differences in sexting behaviors and motivations based on couple’s situation. To do this, 200 college students (72% female), aged between 19 and 30 years (M = 21.64, DT = 3.27), completed a battery of online questions about their affective-sexual history and several questionnaires about sexting. Among the results, it’s worth noting that people who had a stable relationship received more sexual content (x² = 6.31; p = .012), sent more (x² = 11.97; p = .001) and received more responses to the content they had sent (x² =9.68; p = .002). Considering the reasons for sexting, statistically significant differences were found in doing it out of boredom (x² = 3.88; p = .049), due to feelings of loneliness (x² = 7.91; p = .005) and not knowing what they were doing because of something they had drunk (x² = 6.62; p = .010), with these motivations being more common among people without stable partner. In conclusion, the results show the high prevalence of this new way of sexual communication and highlight the importance of considering relational status when establishing prevention and/or health promotion programs that address the emerging phenomenon of sexting, particularly to encourage other motivations that promote a healthier sexuality. This work has been made possible thanks to the UJI-B2021-13 grant provided by the University Jaume I de Castellon.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Brem, M. J., Stuart, G. L., Cornelius, T. L. & Chorey, R. C. (2019). A longitudinal examination of alcohol problems and cyber, psychological and physical dating abuse: the moderating role of emotion dysregulation. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519876029
Brodie, Z. P., Wilson, C., & Scott, G. G. (2019). Sexual intercourse: Considering social cognitive predictors and subsequent outcomes of sexting behavior in adulthood. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 48, 2367-2379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-019-01497-w
Cornelius, T. L., Bell, K. M., Kistler, T. & Drouin, M. (2020). Consensual sexting among college students: The interplay of coercion and intimate partner aggression in perceived consequences of sexting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(19), 7141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17197141
Courtice, E. L., & Shaughnessy, K. (2017). Technology-mediated sexual interaction and relationships: A systematic review of the literature. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 32(3–4), 269–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2017.1397948
Currin, J. M., Evans, A. E. & Garos, S. (2020). In a relationship, who tends to sext first? Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 38(4), 586-602. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2020.1845312
Dir, A. L., Coskunpinar, A., Steiner, J. L. & Cyders, M. A. (2013). Understanding differences in sexting behaviors across gender, relationship status, and sexual identity, and the role of expectancies in sexting. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 16(8), 568-574. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0545
Drouin, M., Coupe, M. & Temple, J. R. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends… Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 749-756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018
Drouin, M. & Tobin, E. (2014). Unwanted but consensual sexting among young adults: Relations with attachment and sexual motivations. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 412.418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.11.001
Gil-Llario, M. D., Gil-Juliá, B., Morell-Mengual, V., Cárdenas-López, G., & Ballester-Arnal, R. (2021). Analysis of demographic, psychological and cultural aspects associated with the practice of sexting in Mexican and Spanish adolescents. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 82, 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.03.013
Gil-Llario, M.D., Morell-Mengual, V., Giménez-García, C., & Ballester-Arnal, R. (2020). The phenomenon of sexting among Spanish teenagers: Prevalence, attitudes, motivations and explanatory variables. Annals of Psychology, 36(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.390481
Gil-Llario, M. D., Morell-Mengual, V., Jiménez-Martínez, M. C., Iglesias-Campos, P., Gil-Julia, B., & Ballester- Arnal, R. (2020). Culture as an influence on sexting attitudes and behaviors: A differential analysis comparing adolescents from Spain and Colombia. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 79, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2020.08.010
Greer, K. M., Cary, K. M., Maas, M. K., Drouin, M., & Cornelius, T. L. (2022). Differences between gender and relationship status in motivations and consequences of consensual sexting among emerging adults. Sexuality & Culture, 26(4), 1432–1451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12119-022-09952-y
Ingram, L. A., Macauda, M., Kauckner, C. & Robillard, A. (2019). Sexual behaviors, mobile technology use and sexting among college students in the American South. American Journal of Health Promotion, 33(1), 87-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0890117118779008
Klettke, B., Hallford, D. J. & Mellor, D. J. (2017). Sexting prevalence and correlates: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology Review, 34, 44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2013.10.007
Madigan, S., Ly, A., Rash, C. L., Van-Ouytsel, J. & Temple, J. R. (2018). Prevalence of multiple forms of sexting behavior among youth. A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics, 172(4), 327-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.5314
Mori, C., Cooke, J. E., Temple, J. R., Ly, A., Lu, Y., Anderson, N., Rash, C. & Madigan, S. (2020). The prevalence of sexting behaviors among emerging adults: a meta-analysis. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(4), 1103-1119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01656-4
Parker, T. S., Blackburn, K. M., Perry, M. S. & Hawks, J. M. (2013). Sexting as an intevention: relationship satisfaction and motivation considerations. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 41(1), 1-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2011.635134
Rodríguez-Castro, Y., Alonso-Ruido, P., González-Fernández, A., Lameiras-Fernández, M., & Faílde-Garrido, J. (2021). Validación de la Escala de Comportamientos de Sexting en Adolescentes: Prevalencia y Consecuencias Asociadas. Psicología Educativa. Revista de los Psicólogos de la Educación, 27(2), 177-185. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2021a9
Samimi, P. & Alderson, K. G. (2014). Sexting among undergraduate students. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 230-241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.027
Van-Ouytsel, J., Punyanunt-Carter, N. M., Walrave, M. & Ponnet, K. (2020). Sexting within young adults’ dating and romantic relationships. Current Opinion in Psychology, 36, 55-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007
Weisskirch, R. S. & Delevi, R. (2011). “Sexting” and adult romantic attachment. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(5), 1697-1701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.02.008