Model for prediction of the degree of neurography in carpal tunnel syndrome
Main Article Content
Abstract
Neuropathy of the median nervecaused bytheentrapment of this nerveasit passesthrough the carpal tunnel is very common. Its symptoms and signs are known as carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), whose diagnosticand therapeutic approach consumes important health resources as it is a highly prevalent pathology. Electroneurography (ENG) or neurographyisconsidered the gold standard in its evaluation, as it allows for quantifying the nerve injury degree, but the generalization of its use sometimes results in its performance even before a careful clinical evaluation and conservative treatment. A sensory and motor involvement of the nerve is usually a criterion for considering a surgical approach, leading to conservative treatment in the rest of the cases. We present a cohort of 816 patients referred to our service for ENG for suspected CTS. A clinical reassessment was carried out, classifying the symptoms as typical or atypical for CTS according to criteria, and ENG was performed in all cases. The correlation of a series of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with a degree of sensory and motor involvement (≥ 3 on our scale) was studied and a statistical model was generated to predict the degree of neuropathy before ENG. Presenting typicalclinicalsymptoms, male gender,age over 50 years, bilateralsymptoms, or presenting them in the dominant hand, as well as positivity of Tinel’s sign and Phalen’s hand correlated with a higher degree of neuropathy.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome:clinical features, diagnosis, and management. The Lancet Neurology. Noviembre de 2016;15(12):1273-84.
Foley M, Silverstein B, Polissar N. The economic burden of carpal tunnel syndrome: Long-term earnings of CTS claimants in Washington State. Am J Ind Med. Marzo de 2007;50(3):155-72.
Lakshminarayanan K, Shah R, Li ZM. Sex-related differences in carpal arch morphology. Araújo GCS de, editor. PLoS ONE. 22 de mayo de 2019;14(5):e0217425.
González Del Pino J, Delgado-Martínez AD, González González I, Lovic A. Value of the Carpal Compression Test in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. Journal of Hand Surgery. Febrero de 1997;22(1):38-41.
Saint-Lary O, Rébois A, Mediouni Z, Descatha A. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Primary Care and Occupational Factors. Front Med [Internet]. 5 de mayo de 2015 [citado 1 de mayo de 2020];2. Disponible: http://journal.frontiersin.org/Article/10.3389/fmed.2015.00028/abstract.
Wipperman J, Goerl K. Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosisand Management. AmFam Physician. 15 de diciembre de 2016;94(12):993-9.
Moldaver J. Tinel’s sign. Its characteristics and significance. J Bone Joint Surg Am. Abril de 1978;60(3):412-4.
Phalen GS. The birth of a syndrome, or carpal tunnel revisited. J Hand Surg Am. Marzo de 1981;6(2):109-10.
Padua L, LoMonaco M, Gregori B, Valente EM, Padua R, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification and sensitivity in 500 carpal tunnel syndrome hands. Acta Neurol Scand. Octubre de 1997;96(4):211-7.
Witt JC, Hentz JG, Stevens JC. Carpal tunnel syndrome with normal nerve conduction studies. Muscle & Nerve. 2004;29(4):515-22.
Graham B, Regehr G, Naglie G, Wright JG. Development and Validation of Diagnostic Criteria for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. Julio de 2006;31(6):919.e1-919.e7.
Huisstede BM, van den Brink J, Randsdorp MS, Geelen SJ, Koes BW. Effectiveness of Surgical and Postsurgical Interventions for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome—A Systematic Review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. Agosto de 2018;99(8):1660-1680.e21.
Lozano-Calderón S, Anthony S, Ring D. The Quality and Strength of Evidence for Etiology: Example of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. The Journal of Hand Surgery. Abril de 2008;33(4):525-38.
Alfonso C, Jann S, Massa R, Torreggiani A. Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of the carpal tunnel syndrome: a review. Neurol Sci. Junio de 2010;31(3):243-52.
Graham B. The Value Added by Electrodiagnostic Testing in the Diagnosis of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume. Diciembre de 2008;90(12):2587-93.
Sonoo M, Menkes DL, Bland JDP, Burke D. Nerve conduction studies and EMG in carpal tunnel syndrome: Do they add value? Clinical Neurophysiology Practice. 2018;3:78-88.