Use of the CIPEC in the special education centers of the Canary Islands

Main Article Content

Heriberto Rodríguez Mateo
Pastora Calvo Hernández
Isabel Luján Henríquez
Cristina Merchán Mujica

Abstract

The entry into force of the LOE and LOMCE provides the pupils with disorders such as Graves of Conduct for Special Needs Education. While it is clear the use of different questionnaires and dimensional scales for detection of severe behavioral disorders, curiously Spain does not have a common detection instrument (Merchán, 2016). Questionnaire Indicators of emotional and behavioral problems (CIPEC) has proven to be an instrument easy to use (Merchán, 2009; RodriguezMateo, Luján and Mesa, 2012; Rodriguez-Mateo and Luján, 2013) and psychometric guarantees of reliability and validity and that allows teachers to report students who can present indicators consistent with TGC in this checks the CIPEC as an instrument for detecting behavioral problems and emotional disorders in all special education centers of the Canary Islands. With a sample of 471 students / as (population 530), a confidence level of 99% and 2% error, the results confirm that the teachers in special education centers is a good agent detection and identification the TGC. 5.5% of the population have TGC EEC, and 60% has no significant behavioral difficulties. There is a high overall reliability of the questionnaire (Cronbach’s alpha .95), and have been able to obtain adequate for each of the main factors compontes or reliabilities. It shows how there is a linear influence of the sum total of the questionnaire based on the final score. Finally, an adjusted model (R2 0, 955) is proposed with 12 items, significantly reducing the CIPEC.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez Mateo, H., Calvo Hernández, P., Luján Henríquez, I., & Merchán Mujica, C. (2016). Use of the CIPEC in the special education centers of the Canary Islands. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 2(1), 307–318. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n1.v2.302
Section
Articles

References

Achenbach, T.M. y Rescorla, L.A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA School-Age Forms & Profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, & Families.

Edwards, C (2006). El orden en las aulas. Recursos para resolver los problemas de disciplina en clase. Barcelona: Ceac.

Empson, J y Nabuzoka, D (2006). El desarrollo atípico infantil. Problemas emocionales y conductuales. Maltrato infantil y problemas de aprendizaje. Barcelona: CEAE.

Lacalle, M (2009). Escalas DSM del CBCL y YSR en niños y adolescentes que acuden a consulta en servicios de salud mental. Tesis doctoral. Barcelona. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona. pp 5-14.

Lloret-Segura, S, Ferreres-Traver, A, Hernández-Baeza, A, Tomás-Marco, I. (2014). El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems: una guía práctica, revisada y actualizada. Anales de Psicología, a vol. 30, pp 1151-1169 Universidad de Murcia.

Merchán, C (2016). El papel del profesorado en la identificación de los trastornos graves de conducta. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

Reynolds, C.R. y Kamphaus, R.W. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children: second edition manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Services.

Rodríguez-Mateo, H., Luján, I., Mesa, J.L. (2012). La detección de trastornos graves de conducta en el ámbito escolar a través del CIPEC. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Vol. 2, nº 1. pp 381-388.

Rodríguez -Mateo, H. y Luján, I. (2013). Los Trastornos Graves de Conducta: valor predictivo dentro del ámbito escolar. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Vol. 2, nº 1. pp 121-130.