Genre and creative writing: comparative study between children of primary schools and university students

Main Article Content

Mª Jesús Fernández Sánchez

Abstract

This research aimed to explore gender differences in the quality of introduction in creative texts, from the beginning to the final stages of adolescence. A total of 105 students from Primary Schools and 105 students at University of Extremadura wrote a narrative text. After that, the quality of introduction on each story was analyzed according to 12 criteria of evaluation about content, spelling and vocabulary richness of the text. Some of these criteria, belong to a standardized test (PROESC) and, others, are from a rubric for assessing the quality of narrative text. The results show that in Primary Education, girls were significantly better than children in writing the introduction of the story and, more specifically, in regard to physical and psychological description of the characters, but these differences were not demonstrated in texts produced by university students. In addition, we observed that, in Primary Education, children made fewer spelling mistakes in the phrase "once upon a time" than girls; also, they used a richer vocabulary than girls to indicate the time in which the story took place. This trend of results in spelling in favor of men changed at University, but they maintained a better semantic level than women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Fernández Sánchez, M. J. (2014). Genre and creative writing: comparative study between children of primary schools and university students. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 1(1), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v1.352
Section
Articles

References

Anglin, J.M. (1993). Vocabulary development: a morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society of Research in Child Development, 58 (10, Serial Nº 238).

Benítez, R. (2008). La evaluación de las narraciones escritas: una perspectiva holística focalizada. Enunciación, 13, 28-37.

Berninger, V. W. y Fuller, F. (1992). Gender Differences in Orthographic, Verbal, and Compositional Fluency: Implications for Assessing Writing Disabilities in Primary Grade Children. Journal of School Psychology, 30, 363-382.

Berninger, V., Whitaker, D., Feng, Y., Swanson, H. L., & Abbott, R. (1996). Assessment of planning, translating, and revising in junior high writers. Journal of School Psychology, 34, 23−52.

Cassany, D. (1999). Construir la escritura. Barcelona: Paidós.

Cuetos, F., Ramos, J.L. & Ruano, E. (2002). PROESC: Batería de evaluación de los procesos de escritura. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Graesser, A.C., Singer, M. y Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101 (3), 371-395.

Graham, S. & Harris, K. (2000). The role of self-regulation and transcription skills in writing and writing development. Educational Psycologist, 35 (1), 3-12.

Graham, S., Harris, K., y Fink, B. (2002). Contribution of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 669-686.

Hayes, J. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. En C. M. Levy & S. Ransdell (Eds.). The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences and applications

(pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Jiménez, J.E. y Muñetón, M. A. (2002). Dificultades de aprendizaje de la escritura. Aplicaciones de la Psicolingüística y de las nuevas tecnologías. Madrid: Trotta.

Jimenéz,J.E., O’Shanahan,I., Tabraue,M., Artiles,C., Muñetón,M., Guzmán,R., et al. (2008). Evolución de la escritura de palabras de ortografía arbitraria en lengua española.Psicothema, 20 (4),

-794.

Matsumura, L.C., Patthey-Chavez, G.G., Valdés, R. y Garnier, H. (2002). Teacher feedback, writing assignment quality, and tirad-grade students’ revision in lower-and higher-achieving urban schools. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 3-25.

Montanero, M., Lucero, M. y Fernández, M. J. (en prensa). Coevaluación iterativa con rúbrica de textos narrativos en Educación Primaria. Infancia y Aprendizaje.

Morales, F. (2004). Evaluar la escritura, sí…Pero ¿Qué y cómo evaluar?. Acción Pedagógica, 13 (1), 38-48.

Nicasio, J. y González, L. (2006). Diferencias en la conciencia morfológica, la escritura y el lenguaje en función del desarrollo y el nivel educativo del niño. Psicothema, 18 (2), 171-179.

Ochoa-Angrino, S., Aragón, L., Correa, M. & Mosquera, S. (2008). Funcionamiento metacognitivo de niños escolares en la escritura de un texto narrativo antes y después de una pauta de corrección

conjunta [Versión electrónica], Acta Colombiana de Psicología, 11 (2), 77-88.

Singer, M., Harkness, D., & Stewart, S. T. (1997). Constructing inferences in expository text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 24, 199-228.

Yan, C. M. W., McBride-Chang, C., Wagner, R. K., Zhang, J., Wong, A. M. Y. & Shu, H. (2012). Writing quality in Chinese children: speed and fluency matter. Reading and Writing, 25 (7), 1499-1521.