The good use of reason depends on emotions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Getting to know the capacities and limitations of the reasoning brain can help us to understand why some learning situations are efficient while others are not. Brain imaging techniques can offer this information, hence current neuroscience is inclined to use service-learning methodologies which include emotion when measuring mental and brain learning efficiency. In this paper we collect results from empirical research on logico-emotional training based in control by inhibition strategies. This strategy consists in training subjects in self-instructions to avoid falling into the perceptive pairing bias. Results show an increase in the percentage of success from 10% to 90% of the trained subjects, as opposed to subjects trained with other methodologies commonly used in the classroom. As a conclusion, it has been shown that brain activity hints of metacognition imply a deeper and more successful learning experience in the teacher/pupil diad.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Blanchard-Fields, F. (1998). The role of emotion in social cognition across the adult life span. In K. W. Schaie & M. P. Lawton (Eds.), Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: Focus on emotion and adult development 238–265. New York: Springer
Bonnefond, M., Van der Henst J.B. (2013) Deduction electrified: ERPs elicited by the processing of words in conditional arguments. Brain and Language 124:3, 244-256.
Cosmides, L., y Tooby J. (1992). Cognitive adaptions for social Exchange. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Grosset, Putnam, New York.
Damasio, H., Grabowski, T., Frank, R., Galaburda, A. M., & Damasio, A. R. (1994). The return of Phineas Gage: clues about the brain from the skull of a famous patient. Science, 264(5162), 1102-1105.
Evans, J. St.B.T., y Over, D.E. (1996). Rationality and reasoning. UK: Holyoak K.J. y Morrison, R. G. (2012). (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, OUP
Houdé, O. (2011). Imagerie cérébrale, cognition et pédagogie. M/S-Medecine Sciences, 27(5), 535.
Houdé, O., Zago, L., Crivello, F., Moutier, S., Pineau, A., Mazoyer, B., & Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2001). Access to deductive logic depends on a right ventromedial prefrontal area devoted to emotion and feeling: evidence from a training paradigm. Neuroimage, 14(6), 1486-1492.
Johnson-Laird, P.N. (2005) Deductive reasoning. In Ping, Li, and Chen, Xiang (Eds.) Cognitive Studies of Science and Reasoning. Beijing, China: Hang Xi People’s Press. (2) 409-449. [Trans. of J-L, 1999]
Lazarus, R. (2000). Estrés y emoción: manejo e implicaciones en nuestra salud. Bilbao: Desclée de Brouwer
Levenson, R.W.; Carstensen, L.L.; Friesen, W.V.; Ekman, P. (1991). Emotion, physiology and expression in old age. Psychology and Aging (6) 28-35.
Martínez, M., & Vasco, C. E. (2015). Sentimientos: encuentro entre la neurobiología y la ética según Antonio Damasio. Revista Colombiana de Bioética, 6(2), 181-194.
O'Connell, B., Palmer, S., & Williams, H. (2012). Solution Focused Coaching in Practice. Routledge.
Powell, D.H. (1994). Profiles in cognitive aging. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Salto F., Méndez J. y Requena C. (2015). Programa razonamiento formal para personas mayores (2008 a la actualidad) financiado por el Ayuntamiento de Ponferrada. http://envejecimientoentodaslasedades.unileon.es
Stein, N.L.; Trabasso, T. (1992). The organisation of emotional experience: Creating links among emotion, thinking, language, and intentional action. Cognition and Emotion (6) 225-244.
Wason, PC, y Shapiro, D. (1971). Natural y artificial experiencia en un problema de razonamiento. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology ,23 (1), 63-71.
Zajonc, R.B. (2000). Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independenceof affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.). Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition, 31–58. New York: Cambridge University Press.