Interpersonal relations in "difficult" and "non-difficult" classes of fundamental teaching II

Main Article Content

Adriana de Melo Ramos
Telma Pileggi Vinha

Abstract

This is a descriptive, exploratory study based on constructivist theory, in order to characterize classes considered “difficult” and “not difficult”, identifying common and / or divergent in organizing these factors and investigate the sociomoral environment, as regards to work with the knowledge, interpersonal relationships, rules and social conflicts. The sample was composed of two “difficult” classes and two “not difficult” two schools of Secondary School. Participants were students and their teaching teams. The data were collected in three ways: interviews with students and staff members; weekly observations and collecting materials Qualitative analysis indicated that in all classes surveyed had an excessive appreciation of the conventional rules, many meaningless, with no spaces for discussion or establishment of standards, which were usually imposed by authority aiming to prevent conflicts occur, and noncompliance was associated with expiatory penalties. Conflicts were seen as negative, and avoided being contained. Classes were meaningless, always held equal, favoring situations of indiscipline. In the “difficult” classes dialogue was disrespectful and hostile by both parties: both teachers and students maintained a relationship of constant confrontation, there were numerous situations incivilities. Teachers recognized the difficulty in dealing with the classes. Students resisted more to obey the rules and guidance of teachers, and also more questioning. In the “not difficult” classes had greater obedience and submission, the dialogue was less disrespectful, students were undergoing more rules imposed, trying to meet the expectations of the teachers. The relationship between peers also influenced the type of each class room as well as the academic performance of students. Expected to trigger questions that can serve as a challenge to a change in the thinking of educators, seeking a more cooperative and critical sociomoral environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
de Melo Ramos, A., & Pileggi Vinha, T. (2014). Interpersonal relations in "difficult" and "non-difficult" classes of fundamental teaching II. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 6(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v6.715
Section
Articles

References

Bauman, Z. (1998). O mal-estar da pós-modernidade. Rio de Janeiro: Jorge Zahar.

Blin, J. F., & Gallais-Deulofeu, C. (2005). Classes difíceis: ferramentas para prevenir e administrar os problemas escolares. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Díaz-Aguado, M. J. (2005). La violencia entre iguales en la adolescencia y su prevención desde la escuela. Madrid: Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Eccles, J., Lord, S., & Roeser, R. (1996). The impact of stage-environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and families. In: D. Cicherti & S. Toth (Eds.), Adolescence: opportunities and challenges. Rochester: University of Rochester Press.

Goergen, P. (2001). Educação moral: adestramento ou reflexão comunicativa? Revista Educação e Sociedade, Campinas, SP: CEDES, 22(76).

La Taille, J. M. Y. (1996). A indisciplina e o sentimento de vergonha. In J. G. Aquino (Ed.), Indisciplina na escola: alternativas teóricas e práticas (pp. 9-23). São Paulo: Summus Editorial.

La Taille, J. M. Y. (2009). Formação ética: do tédio ao respeito de si. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Licciardi, L. M. F. S. (2010). Investigando os conflitos entre as crianças na escola. Campinas, SP. Dissertação (Mestrado em Educação) – Faculdade de Educação, Universidade Estadual de Campinas.

Lipovetsky, G. (2004). Les temps hypermodernes. Paris: Grasset.

Lucatto, L. C. (2012). A justiça restaurativa na escola: investigando as relações interpessoais (Dissertação de Mestrado). Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP.

Piaget, J. (1926). Representação do mundo na criança. Rio de Janeiro: Record.

Piaget, J. (1973). Para onde vai a educação? Rio de Janeiro: Livraria José Olympio. (Original publicado em 1948).

Ramos, A. M., Tognetta, L. R. P., Vinha, T. P, & Mariano, T. P. J. (2011). As classes difíceis e suas crises: uma proposta de diagnóstico e intervenção. In: L. R. Tognetta, & T. P. Vinha (Eds.), Os conflitos na instituição educativa – perigo ou oportunidade? (pp. 305-330). Campinas: Mercado de Letras.

Tardelli, D. D. (2008). A manifestação da solidariedade em adolescentes: um estudo sobre a personalidade moral. Psicologia, Ciência e Profissão, 28(2), 288-303.

Tognetta, L. P., & Vinha, T. P. (2007). A prática de regras na escola: ambiente autocrático X ambiente democrático. Anais do I Encontro Sobre Educação Moral, Ética e Pós-Modernidade (pp. 17). Rio Claro, SP.