Guidelines to study academic motivation
Main Article Content
Abstract
As motivation bears a reciprocal relation to learning and performance, it is necessary to persist in the study of this psychological construct. Although people have several beliefs about what is and what determines motivation, the scientific study must be guided by a theoretical frame. For this reason, the aim of the present work is to provide guidelines for the study of academic motivation, so that motivational researchers work proving hypothesis, looking to reach fixed objectives or solving doubts, within a practical context which reflects educational reality. To this end, this work tries to clarify what is academic motivation, joining criteria and definitions of the different theoretical models. It also tries to describe the factors which seem to determine academic motivation so that they help us to assess this complex psychological construct. Finally, it also tries to provide guidelines to enhance motivation, so that teachers and parents will know how to act to improve their children academic motivation, which has been demanded persistently by them. This research has been possible thanks to the University of León, which funded the ULE20011-4 project granted to the author to the 2012 year.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Alonso-Tapia, J. (2005 a). Motivar en la escuela, motivar en la familia. Ediciones Morata: Madrid.
Alonso-Tapia, J. (2005 b). Motives, expentancies and value-interests related to learning: The MEVA questionnaire. Psicothema, 13 (3), 404-411.
Alonso-Tapia, J. (2007). Evaluación de la motivación en entornos educativos. En M. Alvarez y R. Bisquerra (Ed.), Manual de orientación y tutoría. BArceloa: Kluwer (libro electrónico.)
Alonso-Tapia, J. (2012). Evaluación psicopedagógica y orientación educativa. I. Problemas de motivación y aprendizaje. Madrid: Síntesis.
Alonso-Tapia, J. & Sánchez, J. (1992). El cuestionario MAPE-1: Motivación hacia el aprendizaje. En J. Alonso-Tapia: Motivar en la adolescencia: Teoría, evaluación e intervención (pp. 53-92) Madrid: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.
Ayala, C. L., Martínez, R., & Yuste, C. (2004). CEAM. Cuestionario de estrategias de Aprendizaje y Motivación. Madrid: Instituto de Orientación Psicológica EOS.
Bandura, A. (1997): Self-efficacy: The exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for creating self-efficacy scales. En F. Pajares and T. Urdan (Eds.), Adolescence and Education, pp.307-338) Vol V: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing
De Caso, A. M., Marbán, J. M., Álvarez, M. L., García, J. N., Navarro, J. I., Martín, C. & Martín, L. J. (2010). Motivación y educación. En J. I. Navarro y C. Martín (Coords.) Psicología de la educación para docentes (pp. 133-153). Madrid: Pirámide.
De Caso, A. M. & García, J. N. (2006). Relación entre la motivación y la escritura. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 38 (3), 477-492.
Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Handbook of self-determination research. Rochester: The University of Rochester Press.
Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
Galindo, J. M. (2007). Hablemos de motivación y su intervención en el marco escolar. Colección Didáctica (Háblame) (CD-Room). Almería: Háblame.
Gilbert, I. (2011). Motivar para aprender en el aula. Las siete claves de la motivación escolar. Barcelona: Paidós Educador.
González, A. (2005). Motivación Académica. Teoría, aplicaciones y evaluación. Madrid: Pirámide. Meece, J. L., Anderman, E. M., & Anderman, L. H. (2006). Classroom goal structure, student motivation, and academic achievement. Annual Review of Psychology, 57 487-503.
Montero, I., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (1992). El cuestionario MAPE-2. En J. Alonso-Tapia: Motivar en la adolescencia: Teoría, evaluación e intervención (pp. 205-231) Madrid: Publicaciones de la Universidad Autónoma.
Pajares, F; Hartley, J; Valiante, G. (2001): Response Format in Writing Self-Efficacy Assessment: Greater Discrimination Increases Prediction. Measurement & Evaluation in Counseling & Development. 33 (4), 214-221.
Pelechano, V. (1975). Cuestionario MAE (Motivación y Ansiedad de Ejecución). Madrid: Fraser Española.
Pintrich, P. R. & Schunk, D. H. (2006). Motivación en contextos educativos. Teoría, investigación y aplicaciones. (2da edición). Madrid: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., García, T. & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813.
Suárez, J. M. & Fernández, A.P. (2005). Escalas de evaluación de las estrategias motivacionales de los estudiantes. Anales de Psicología, 21(1), 116-128.
Valle, A., Núñez, J. C., Rodríguez, S., & González-Pumariega, S. (2002). La motivación académica. En J. A. González-Pienda, R. González-Cabanach, J. C. Núñez y A. Valle (Coors.), Manual de Psicología de la Educación (pp. 117-144). Madrid: Pirámide.
Weiner, B. (1992). Human motivation. Metaphors, theories and research. Newbury Parck, California: Sage.
Wolters, C. A. & Pintrich, P. R. (2001): Contextual differences in student motivation and self-regulated learning in mathematics, english and social studies classrooms. En H. J. Hartman (Ed.), Metacognition in Learning and Instructionf: Theory, Research and Practice (pp.103-124). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Ziegler, A. & Stoeger, H. (2004). Evaluation of an attributional retraining (modelling technique) to reduce gender differences in chemistry instruction. High Ability Studies, 15 (1), 63-83.