Creative researchers conflicts management
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Resum
Creativity is an attitude, human and dynamic, promoting change and development, both on an individual and social level. Although their procedure is individual, their work takes the collective form in a discontinued and instantaneous process, not harming the subjects in the concern of evaluating its impact. Their condition is the climate, the team environment, presupposes the training, the learning of methods, the continuous generation of ideas, questions that, assuming divergent and lateral thinking, necessarily induce the management of their conflicts. In this sense, we try to find, through a group of researchers and specialized coordinators, indications of such management in the teams they have oriented. In order to do this, we used two tests, one about creativity, and another about conflicts, and the statistical package for the social sciences (SPSS-Portuguese version), where we could see that conflict management in creative researchers is an evidence, due to the search for improvements in performance and in productivity, on the part of its members, and due to the absence of conflicts in the studied object.
Descàrregues
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Referències
Badke Schaub, P., Goldschmidt, G., & Meijer, M. (2010). How does cognitive conflict in design teams support the development of creative ideas? Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(2), 119-133.
De Dreu, C. (2006). When Too Little or Too Much Hurts: Evidence for a Curvilinear Relationship Between Task Conflict and Innovation in Teams. Journal of Management, Vol. 32 (1), February 2006, 83-107. doi: 10.1177/0149206305277795.
Dominguéz, E. (2013). Work stressors and creativity, M@n@gement, 4/2013 (16), p. 479-503. doi: 10.3917/mana.164.0479.
Farh, J.L., Farh, C.I.C., & Lee, C. (2010). Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010, Vol. 95, (6), 1173–1180. doi: 10.1037/a0020015.
Fisher, K., & Fisher, M.D. (1998). The distributed mind. New York: AMACOM.
Freud, S. (1910a). A Special Type of Choice of Object made by Men (Contributions to the Psychology of Love I). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XI.
Freud, S. (1924b). The Psychoanalytic Review (1913-1957); New York16 (Jan 1, 1929): 222.
Gardenswartz, L., & Rowe, A. (1994). Diverse teams at work: Capitalizing on the power of diversity. Chicago: Irwin.
Grau, J.B.; Sánchez – Garcia, Prizmic-Kuzmica, A.J., Vigil-Colet, A. (2014). Spanish adaptation of the Creative Potential and Practised Creativity scale (CPPC-17) in the workplace and inside the organization. Psicothema 2014, Vol. 26, No. 1, 55-62 doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.68.
Harter, S. (1986). Processes underlying the construction, maintenance, and enhancement of the self-concept in children. Psychological perspectives on the self, 3(13), 7-181.
Jackson, S.E. (Ed.) (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. West. Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53-76). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Jesuíno, J.C. (1996). Processos de Liderança. Horizonte de Psicologia; 2.ª Ed. Livros Horizonte.
Kayser, T. A. (1994). Building team power: How to unleash on the collaborative genius of work teams. New York. Irwin.
Kayser, T.A. (1995). Mining group gold: How to cash in on the collaborative brainpower of a group. Chicago. Irwin Professional Publishing.
Mumford, Michael D.; Gustafson, Sigrid B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, Vol 103 (1), Jan 1988, 27-43. ttp://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.1.27.
Paulus, Paul B. (2000). Groups, Teams, and Creativity: The Creative Potential of Idea-generating Groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49 (2), 237-262.
Rank, O. (1932). Art and Artist: Creative Urge and Personality Development. Tudor Publishing Co.
Rosso, B.D. (2014). Creativity and Constraints: Exploring the Role of Constraints in the Creative Processes of Research and Development Teams. Organization Studies 2014, Vol. 35(4) 551–585.
Smith, G. J., Carlsson, I. M., & Danielsson, A. (1990). The Creative Process: A functional model based on empirical studies from early childhood up to middle age. Intl Universities Pr Inc.
Stasser, G. (Eds.) (1999). The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice. L. Thompson, J. Levine, D. Messick., Shared Knowledge in organizations (pp.49-69). Mahweh, N.J.: Erlbaum
Stasser, G., Stewart, D.D., & Wittenbaum, G.M. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
Taylor, A; Greve, H.R. (2006). Superman or the Fantastic Four? Knowledge combination and experience in innovation teams. Academy of Management Journal2006, Vol. 49, No. (4), 723–740.
Taylor, I. (Eds.) (1975). A retrospective view of creativity investigation. In Taylor & J. Getzels, Perspectives in creativity (pp. 6-39). Chicago: Aldine.
Turiel, E. (1974). Conflict and transition in adolescent moral development. Child development, 14-29.