Early attention in prematury. A case study.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: within the scientific literature authors such as Martínez (2008) or Vericat and Orden in 2017 show a significant increase of prematurity at world level and the importance of early onset in neonatal intensive care units. That is why it is considered a health problem which proves necessary to keeping on research in order to get a better attention, quality and specialization of the services present in a baby s development and their family.
Case description: our research presents a study of a prematurity case of Early Attention Service in Cáceres attendance is presented. The aim for this attendance is to carry out a kind of intervention which allows them to improve the different development areas under what is considered normal, considering the chronological age of the attendee. Objective: to describe the assessment, intervention and follow up process from the Early Attention Service. Procedure: during 45 bi-weekly sessions of 45 minutes each a study is carried out. Throughout these individual sessions, the different deficit aspects found through the Brunet- Lézine Scale are worked through. Results: after the intervention carried out by the stimulating subject improvements on the motor area is observed.
Conclusions: results show the importance of a development of a program adapted to the user s individual needs, their family and their environment in order to equilibrate the maturity age with the chronological one in the least time possible.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Fernández López, T., Ares Mateos, G., Carabaño Aguado, I., & Sopeña Corvinos, J. (2012). El Prematuro Tardío: el gran olvidado. Revista Pediatria Ateción Primaria, 23–29.
Hadders-Algra, M., Boxum, A., Hielkema, T., & Hamer, E. (2016). Effect of Early Intervention in Infants at Very High Risk of Cerebral Palsy: A systematic review. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 59(3), 246–258.
Hughes, A., Redsell, S., & Glazebrook, C. (2016). Motor Development Interventions for Preterm Infants: A systematic review and meta-analysis. School of Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom., 138(4).
Josse, D. (1997). Brunet-Lezine Revisado. Escala de Desarrollo Psicomotor de la Primera Infancia. Madrid: Psymtec.
Martínez, J. L. (2008). Historia de la Neonatología y los Desafíos del Siglo XXI. Rev. Med. Clin. Condes, 19(3), 152–157.
McWilliam, RA. (2009). Protocol for the routines-based interview. Siskin Children s. Chattanooga, TN, USA.
Mulas, F., & Hernández, S. (2005). Neurodesarrollo y Fundamentos Anatómicos Neurobiológicos de la Atención Temprana. Atención Temprana. Desarrollo Infantil, Diagnóstico e Intervención, 3–22.
Ortiz Venegas, A., Robayo Gutierrez, V., & Alejo de Paula, L. (2014). Revisión sistemática de las Intervenciones para la Estimulación en Niños con Retraso Motor de 0 a 12 meses de edad. Revista Ibero Americana Movimiento Científico., 8(1), 118–130.
Rellan Rodríguez, S., García de Ribera, C., & Aragón García, M. (2008). El Recién Nacido Prematuro. Protocolos Diágnosticos Terapeúticos de La AEP: Neonatología, 8, 68–77.
Sánchez Caravaca, J. (2006). La eficacia de los Programas de Atención Temprana en niños de Riesgo Biológico. Estudio sobre los efectos de un programa de Atención Temprana en niños prematuros en su primer año de vida.
Spittle, A., Orton, J., Anderson, P., Boyd, R., & Doyle, L. (2015). Early developmental Intervention Programmes provided Post Hospital Discharge to Prevent Motor and Cognitive Impairment in Preterm Infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.
Turnbull, A., Turbiville, V., & Turnbull, H. (2000). Evolution of Familyprofessional Partnerhips: Collective empowerment as the model for the early twenty-first century. Handbook of Early Childhood Intervention (2nd Edition), 630–650.
Vericat, A., & Orden, A. B. (2017). Riesgo Neurológico en el Niño de mediano Riesgo Neonatal. Acta Pediátrica México., 38(4).
Wachholtz, D., & Cortés, C. (2016). Intervención Temprana en Niños con Alto Riesgo de Desarrollar Parálisis Cerebral: Una revisión sistemática. Revista Chilena de Terapia Ocupacional, 16(2).
Wen, A., Yuan, M., & Wen, S. (2013). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Routines-based early Intervention for Children with or at Risk for Developmental Delay. El Sevier Research Developmental Desablities, 34(10), 3112–3123.