Online Sexual Grooming of Minors: Contributions to its Knowledge and Prevention
Main Article Content
Abstract
The growing use of the Internet and of social media by children and young people has spurred the conditions for the development of sexual grooming, a process that facilitates the perpetration of sexual crimes, as it allows an easier access to a high number of potential victims, increases the opportunities to perpetrate both online and personal contact with minors, and facilitates the identification of vulnerabilities in the victims. This is a growing phenomenon and it is urgent to know it, in order to develop effective strategies to promote the safety of children and young people on the Internet and to prevent the harm resulting from this type of abuse. In order to do it we developed a qualitative study, using semi-structured interviews and document analysis, submitted to a content analysis (a categorical semantic analysis). The sample consisted of 4 male offenders, 2 face-to-face interviewees and 2 involved in online sexualized dialogues with minors, and 1 female victim, who was also interviewed.
The results allowed to distinguish two distinct approaches, one very direct, with the almost immediate introduction of sexual themes, and another approach in which the subject adopt a set of strategies that are based on the creation and maintenance of a relational bond, being consistent with what is considered the core strategies of the grooming process. While in the most direct approach the offender seems to take advantage of the typical sexual curiosity of the developmental period, in the second approach the subject uses a relational bond to get the involvement of the minor and avoid disclosure. Although grooming appears in the literature as a major component of online sexual interactions with minors, we found in our research that grooming is not necessary for achieving sexual contacts or child sexual abuse.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Bardin, L. (2011). Análise de Conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70, Lda
Berson, I. R. (2003). Grooming Cybervictims. Journal of School Violence, 2(1), 5-18, doi:10.1300/J202v02n01_02
Black, P. J., Wollis, M., Woodworth, M., & Hancock, J. T. (2015). A linguistic analysis of grooming strategies of online child sex offenders: Implications for our understanding of predatory sexual behavior in an increasingly computer-mediated world. Child Abuse & Neglect, 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.12.004
Branca, C. M., Grangeia, H., & Cruz, O. (2016). Grooming online em Portugal: Um estudo exploratório. Análise Psicológica, 34(3), 249-263. doi:10.14417/ap.978
Briggs, P., Simon, W. T., & Simonsen, S. (2010). An Exploratory Study of Internet-Initiated Sexual Offenses and the Chat Room Sex Offender: Has the Internet Enabled a New Typology of Sex Offender? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 20(10), 1-20. doi:10.1177/1079063210384275
Craven, S., Brown, S., & Gilchrist, E. (2006). Sexual grooming of children: Review of literature and theoretical considerations. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 12 (3), pp. 287-299. doi:10.1080/13552600601069414
Davidson, J., Grove-Hills, J., Bifulco, A., Gottschalk, P., Caretti, V., Pham, T., & Webster, S. (2011). Online abuse: Literature review and policy context. (Project Report) European online grooming project. Retirado de http://www.scotcen.org.uk/media/22523/european-online-grooming-projectliteraturereview.pdf
Kloess, J. A., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., & Beech, A. R. (2017). Offense Processes of Online Sexual Grooming and Abuse of Children Via Internet Communication Platforms. Sexual Abuse 00(0), 1-24, doi: 10.1177/1079063217720927
Kloess, J. A., Seymour-Smith, S., Hamilton-Giachritsis, C. E., Long, M. L., Shipley, D., & Beech, A. R. (2015). A Qualitative Analysis of Offenders’ Modus Operandi in Sexually Exploitative Interactions With Children Online. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 29(6), 1-29. doi: 10.1177/1079063215612442
Malesky, L. J. (2007). Predatory online behavior: modus operandi of convicted sex offenders in identifying potential victims and contacting minors over the internet. Journal Of Child Sexual Abuse, 16(2), 23-32. doi:10.1300/J070v16n02_02
McAlinden, A. M. (2006). ‘‘Setting ‘em up’’: Personal, familial and institutional grooming in the sexual abuse of children. Social and Legal Studies, 15, 339-362. doi:10.1177/0964663906066613
United Nations Children’s Fund. (2017). The State of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World. Retirado de https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_101992.html
Wachs, S., Wolf, K. D., & Pan, C. (2012). Cybergrooming: Risk factors, coping strategies and associations with cyberbullying. Psicothema, 24(4), 628-633
Webster, S., Davidson, J., Bifulco, A., Gottschalk, P., Caretti, V., Pham, T. … Grove-Hills, J. (2012). European Online Grooming Project Final Report. European Union. http://www.european-onlinegrooming-project.com/
Winters, G. M., & Jeglic, E. L. (2016). Stages of Sexual Grooming: Recognizing Potentially Predatory Behaviors of Child Molesters. Deviant Behavior, 1-10, doi: 10.1080/01639625.2016.1197656
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., & Mitchell, K. (2004). Internet-initiated Sex Crimes against Minors: Implications for Prevention Based on Findings from a National Study. Journal of Adolescent Health, 35(5), 11-20. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.05.006