Intellectual Disability and the use of Information and Communication Technology: Systematic review
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article offers an existing overview of intellectual disability and its relationship with Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) and with the aim of giving a global perspective through the systematic review of the literature which studies have been carried out on intellectual disability and the use of ICT as a form inclusion, what conclusions have been reached, and what are the next steps to follow. In order for students with disabilities to have access to education. In addition, some bibliometric data is analyzed, to place this research within the great research topic “inclusive education”. The data has been obtained through a systematic review of the literature from 1993 to 2019. The approach is qualitative in that all the scientific articles from SSCI and Scopus that meet the required specifications are used, associated with the search for variables “Intellectual disabilit *”, and “intellectual impair *” (intellectual disability), associated with “ICT” and “internet” and their derivations. The results reveal the existence of seven large related clusters: Down syndrome and other disabilities, education, learning; intellectual disability and their parents or caregivers; intellectual disability and comorbidity or double pathology involvement.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Adell, J. (2011). La competencia digital. Consultado el, 25 de febrero 2018.
Arhipova, S. V., & Sergeeva, O. S. (2015). Features of the information and communication technology application by the subjects of special education. International Education Studies, 8(6), 162–170. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p162.
Bird, B., y Jelinek, M. (1989). The operation of entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 13(2), 21-30.
Bele, I. V., & Kvalsund, R. (2016). A longitudinal study of social relationships and networks in the transition to and within adulthood for vulnerable young adults at ages 24, 29 and 34 years: compensation, reinforcement or cumulative disadvantages? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(3), 314–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1187886
Bunning, K., Heath, B., & Minnion, A. (2010). Interaction between teachersand students with intellectual disability during computer-based activities: The role of human mediation. Technology and Disability, 22(1–2), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.3233/TAD-2010-0278
Cabero, J., Ballesteros, C., Barroso, J., Llorente, M. C., Morales, J. A., Romero, R., & Román, P. (2008). Aportaciones al e-learning desde la investigación educativa. Sevilla: GID.
Castells, M. (2004). The network society A cross-cultural perspective. Edward Elgar.
Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2016). The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 41(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1153052
Claro, M. (2011). El papel de las tecnologías de la información y las comunicaciones en la educación inclusiva.
Ferreira, M. A. (2018). Discapacidad, exclusión social y tecnologías de la información.
Fraser, B. y Lischer, CJ (2010). Una investigación de la relación entre el rendimiento racial y la tendinitis flexora digital superficial en el caballo de carreras pura sangre. Equine veterinary journal, 42 (4), 322-326.
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2016). Dirección de recursos humanos. Pearson Educación.
Gisbert, M., & Esteve, F. (2016). Digital Leaners: la competencia digital de los estudiantes universitarios. La cuestión universitaria, (7), 48-59.
Lancioni, G. E., Singh, N. N., O’Reilly, M. F., Sigafoos, J., Alberti, G., Perilli, V., … Chiariello, V. (2017). Supporting leisure and communication in people with visual and intellectual disabilities via a smartphonebased program. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 35(3), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0264619617715497
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., … Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of clinical epidemiology (Vol. 62). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
Löfgren-Mårtenson, L., Sorbring, E., & Molin, M. (2015). “T@ngled Up in Blue”: Views of Parents and Professionals on Internet Use for Sexual Purposes Among Young People with Intellectual Disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 33(4), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-015-9415-7
Meshur, H. F. A. (2016). Opportunities for disabled people through ICTs: A perspective from Turkey. International Journal on Disability and Human Development, 15(3), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijdhd-2015-0019
Molin, M., Sorbring, E., & Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2015). Teachers’ and parents’ views on the Internet and social media usage by pupils with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities : JOID, 19(1), 22–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744629514563558
Normand, C. L., & Sallafranque-St-Louis, F. (2016). Cybervictimization of Young People With an Intellectual or Developmental Disability: Risks Specific to Sexual Solicitation. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 29(2), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12163
OMS. (2019). Informe Mundial sobre la Discapacidad promovido por el Banco Mundial.
OMS. (2001), Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de la Salud (CIF). Organización Mundial de la Salud. Ginebra [en línea. ]http://www.imserso.es/InterPresent2/groups/imserso/documents/.
O’Reilly, A. (2003). El derecho al trabajo decente de las personas con discapacidades. GLADNET Collection, 206.
Parsons, S., Daniels, H., Porter, J., & Robertson, C. (2008). Resources, staff beliefs and organizational culture: Factors in the use of information and communication technology for adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 21(1), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2007.00361.x
Pérez-Escoda, A., Iglesias-Rodríguez, A., y Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2016). Nurturing digital citizenship: teachers and students facing digital competences. (pp. 631-636). ACM.
Punie, Y., & Brecko, B. (2014). Digcomp: Marco europeo decompetencias digitales. Bruselas: Comisión Europea. http://jakintza. eus/wp-content/uploads/DIGCOMP_Donosfia_ES-Rev. pdf.
Rocha, T., Bessa, M., Gonçalves, M., Cabral, L., Godinho, F., Peres, E., … Chalmers, A. (2012). The Recognition of Web Pages’ Hyperlinks by People with Intellectual Disabilities: An Evaluation Study. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 25(6), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-3148.2012.00700.x
Romero-Frías, E., y Magro Mazo, C. (2016). La emancipación intelectual en la sociedad digital: El maestro ignorante de Rancière en nuestros días.
Salmerón, L., Gómez, M., & Fajardo, I. (2016). How students with intellectual disabilities evaluate recommendations from internet forums. Reading and Writing, 29(8), 1653–1675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9621-4
Stock, S. E., Davies, D. K., Davies, K. R., & Wehmeyer, M. L. (2006). Evaluation ofan application for making palmtop computers accessible to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 31(1), 39–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668250500488645
UNESCO. (2011). Informe sobre indicadores o estándares de tecnologías.
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016 /j.medcli.2010.01.015
Van-Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Waltman, L., Van-Eck, N., & Noyons, E. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002