Urban mobility of the elderly. The role of vertical mobility structures for social participation: the case of the city of Covilhã
Main Article Content
Abstract
The main objective was to carry out a study on the impact that vertical urban mobility infrastructures have on the daily life of older people living in slum neighborhoods. Data collection took place in April and May 2019, in the city of Covilhã, where there are accentuated topographic gaps and where there are four vertical urban mobility structures. The sample includes 109 subjects aged 65 and over, who answered a questionnaire prepared by the project’s researchers. The average age is 73,50 years, 53,2% has the 1st cycle education, 68,8% lives with their spouse or partner, 71,6% indicates that they have no mobility difficulties and 54,1% consider their health status to be “Normal” or “Good” (23,9%). 78% of respondents have lived in the current home / neighborhood for over 10 years, 11,9% have always lived in the same home / neighborhood and 90,8% said they would like to continue living in the same house / neighborhood. 53,2% use “Very” urban vertical mobility structures, and 64,8% use them at least three times a week. The overwhelming majority find these structures convenient and easily accessible, however, 79,8% changed or improved something in this structures. Still, 60,5% consider these structures “Good” or “Very Good”. Most respondents reveal that the use of vertical urban mobility structures allowed them to increase the frequency with which they use the public space, visit people or access services, contributing to improving their mobility, quality of life and social participation.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Aguiar, B., Macário, R. (2017). “The need for na Elderly centred mobility policy”. World Conference on Transport Research – WCTR 2016 Shanghai, 10-15 July 2016. Transportation Research Procedia 25 (4355-4369).
Ballesteros, A., Blasco, B. (2016). Envejecimineto y urbanización: implicacionaes de dos procesos coincidentes. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletin del Instituto de Geografia, UNAM, 89, pp 58-73.
Bárrios, M., Fernandes, A. (2014). “A promoção do envelhecimento ativo ao nível local: análise de programas de
intervenção autárquica”. Revista portuguesa de saúde pública, 32(2), 188-196.
Cabral, M. V., & Ferreira, P. M. (2013) Envelhecimento Activo em Portugal: Trabalho, reforma, lazer e redes sociais. Lisboa: Fund. Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Disponível em: https://www.ffms.pt/upload/docs/envelhecimento-activo_qD9h1QMu0a6cpVzHYdAmw.pdf
Cabral, M. V., Ferreira, P. M., Silva, P. A., Jerónimo, P., & Marques, T. (2013). Processos de Envelhecimento em Portugal. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. Disponível em: https://www.ffms.pt/FileDownload/b45aa8e7-d89b-4625-ba91-6a6f73f4ecb3/processos-de-envelhecimento-em-portugal
CE, (2002), La Réponse de l’Europe au Vieillissement de la Population Mondiale. Promouvoir le Progrès Économique et Social dans un Monde Vieillissant. Bruxelas. Commission des Communautés Européennes. Disponível em: http://eurlex. europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!DocNumber&lg=fr&type_doc=COMfinal&an_doc=2002&nu_doc=143
Fonseca, A. M. (2006). Envelhecer em Portugal: um olhar psicólogo. Povos e Culturas. 65-80
Fonseca, A. (2018). Boas Práticas de Ageing in Place. Divulgar para valorizar – Guia de Boas Práticas. Lisboa.
He, S., Cheung, Y., Tao, S. (2018). Travel mobility and social participation among older people in a transit metropolis: A socio-spatial-temporal perspective. Transportation Research Part A, 118, 608-626.
Machado, P. (2007). “Reflectindo sobre o conceito de envelhecimento activo, pensando no envelhecimento em meio urbano”. Sociológico, 17, série II, 53-63.
Machado, P., Pedro, J., Plácido, I., Rebelo, M., Cachadinha, C., Carvalho, A., Zacarias, W. (2012). “Habitar e Envelhecimento”, Jornadas LNEC: Engenharia para a sociedade – investigação e inovação. Cidades e desenvolvimento. Lisboa, 18-20 junho 2012.
Mollenkopf, H., Marcellini, F., Ruoppila, I., Flaschentrager, P., Gagliardi, C., & Spazzafumo, L. (1997). “Outdoor mobility and social relationships of elderly people”.Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 24, 295-310.
Nordbakke, S. (2013). “Capabilities for mobility among urban older women: barriers, strategies and options”. Jornal of Transport Geography, 26, 166-174.
Oliveira, J., Faria, A., Ferreira, C., Lage, G. (2013). Envelhecimento populacional e Qualidade de Vida -Identificação de boas práticas no domínio do Urbanismo. Porto: Direção Municipal do Urbanismo/ Departamento Municipal de Planeamento Urbano.
Organização Mundial de Saúde (2007). Guia Global das Cidades Amigas das Pessoas Idosas – Envelhecimento e ciclo de vida, saúde na família e na comunidade.
SNS. (2017). Estratégia Nacional para o Envelhecimento Ativo e Saudável 2017 - 2025. Lisboa: República Portuguesa. Disponivel em https://www.sns.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/ENEAS.pdf
Véras, M., Felix, J. (2016). “Questão urbana e envelhecimento populacional: breves conexões entre o direito à cidade e o idoso no mercado de trabalho”. Caderno Metrop. São Paulo, 18 (36), 441-459.
WRVS. (2012). Loneliness amongst older people and the impact of family connections. UK: Royal Voluntary Service. Disponível em: https://www.royalvoluntaryservice.org.uk/Uploads/Documents/How_we_help/lonelin ess-amongst-older-people-and-the-impact-of-family-connections.pdf