Do teachers who believe in educational inclusion have a favorable attitude towards students with gifted?
Main Article Content
Abstract
A commitment to inclusive education means promoting quality education for all learners. Teachers’ beliefs and attitudes towards inclusion are a factor that can influence the quality of the educational response that learners receive. In the case of gifted and talented students, this relationship has been extensively tested in national and international studies, and it has even been observed that teachers who are more committed to the concept of inclusion do not always have favourable attitudes towards these students (McCoach and Siegle, 2007; Tirri, Tallent-Runnels, Adams, Yuen and Lau (2002). The aim of this study was to test the relationship between teachers’ attitudes towards inclusion and towards students with high abilities and their education. A total of 203 active teachers (56 men and 147 women) from different educational levels, aged between 22 and 74 years, 48.53 (15.5) years, answered two questionnaires: the Questionnaire of teachers’ perceptions about inclusion (Cardona, Gómez-Canet & González-Sánchez, 2000) and Opinions about students with high abilities and their education (Original by Gagné & Nadeau (1991, and adapted by Tourón, Fernández & Reyero, 2002). It was found that younger and better-trained teachers show more favourable attitudes towards inclusion. However, these characteristics do not always coincide when we assess their attitudes towards gifted students.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Ainscow, M. (2007). From special education to effective schools for all: a review of progress so far. Londres: SAGE.
Ajzen, I. (2012). Martin Fishbein’s legacy: The reasoned action approach. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 640 (1),11-27 doi:10.1177/0002716211423363.
Brulles, D., Saunders, R., & Cohn, S. J. (2010). Improving performance for gifted education. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(1), 74-86.
Balboni, G. y Pedrabissi, L. (2000). Attitudes of Italian teachers and parents toward school inclusion of students with mental retardation: The role of experience. Education & Training in Mental Retardation & Development Disabilities, 35, 148-159.
Cardona, M. C., Gómez-Canet, P. F.y González-Sánchez, M. E. (2000). Cuestionario de Percepciones del Profesor acerca de una Pedagogía Inclusiva. Documento no publicado, Universidad de Alicante.
Chiner E. (2011). Las percepciones y actitudes del profesorado hacia la inclusión del alumnado con necesidades educativas especiales como indicadores del uso de prácticaseducativasinclusivasen elaula. (Tesis doctoral, Universidad de Alicante).
Copenhaver R.V. & Mc Intyre, D.J. (1992). Teacher Perceptions of Gifted Student. Roeper Review. 14(3), 151-154.
Curtis, J. (2005). Preservice teachers’ attitudes toward gifted Students and gifted education. (Doctoral Dissertation), Columbia University Teachers College, New York, United States. España. Decreto 228/2014 de 14 de octubre, por el que se regula la respuesta educativa a la diversidad del alumnado en la Comunidad Autónoma de Extremadura. Diario Oficial de Extremadura, 21 de octubre de 2014, núm. 202, pp. 31554-31588.
Fernández, T. & Sánchez, T. (2012). Dificultades asociadas a las altas capacidades intelectuales. Sevilla: MAD, S. L.
Folsom, C. (2009). Attitudes of Gifted Children. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Gagné, F. (1991). Brief presentation of Gagnéand Nadeau’sattitudescale: Opinionsabout the gifted and theireducation. Université du Québec à Montréal. Québec, Canada.
Gagné, F. y Nadeau, L. (1991). Opinions about the Gifted and their Education. Université du Québec à Montréal. Québec, Canada.
Geake, J. G. y Gross, M. U. (2008). Teachers’ negative affect toward academically gifted Students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 217-231.
Glaubman, R. y Lifshitz, H. (2001). Ultra-orthodox Jewish teachers’ self-efficacy and willingness for inclusion of pupils with special needs. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 16, 207-223.
Gomez, C., Gozalo, M., Leon, B. y Mendo, S. (2019). Extremadura, verde, blanca y negra. Avances en altas capacidades. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology INFAD Revista de Psicologia, 1(2), 65-74.
Guirado, Á. (2015). ¿Qué sabemos de las altas capacidades? Barcelona: GRAÓ.
Jacobs, N., & Harvey, D. (2010). The extent to which teacher attitudes and expectations predict academic achievement of final year students. Educational Studies, 36(2), 195-206.
Kunter, M., & Holzberger, D. (2014). Loving teaching: Research on teachers’ intrinsic orientations. New York: Routledge.
Matheis, S., Kronborg, L., Schmitt, M & Preckel, F. (2018). Threat or challenge? Teacher beliefs about gifted students and their relationship to teacher motivation. Gifted and talented international, 33, 1-26.
McCoach, D. B., & Siegle, D. (2007). What predicts teachers’ attitudes towards the gifted? Gifted Child Quarterly, 51, 246-255.
National Association for Gifted Children -CEC (2013). Teacher preparation standards in gifted and talented education. http://www.nagc.org/sites/default/files/standards/research%20support%20for%202013%20stands.pdf
National Association for Gifted Children (8 de mayo de 2020). Queesla dotacion. Washington DC. www.nagc.org.
Pierce, R. y Adams, C. (2009). Attitudes of preservice and experienced teachers toward diverse learners: An expanded abstract. (Doctoral Dissertation), Ball State University, Indiana, United States.
Reyes, M. M. (2010). La formación del profesorado, motor de cambio en la escuela del siglo XXI. Revista de Educación Inclusiva, 3(3), 89-102.
Tirri, K. A., Tallent-Runnels, M. K., Adams, A. (2002). Cross-cultural predictors of teachers’ attitude towards gifted education: Finland, Hong Kong, and the United States. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 26(2), 112-131.
Tourón, J., Fernández, R. y Reyero, M. (2002). Actitudes del profesorado hacia la superdotación. Implicaciones para el desarrollo de programas de formación. Faísca, 8, 95-110.
Tourón, J. & Freeman, J. (2017). APA Handbook on Giftedness and Talent. Washington: American Psychological Association (APA).
UNESCO (1994). Declaración de Salamanca y Marco de acción ante las necesidades educativas especiales. París: UNESCO.
Van Hove,G., De Schauwert, E., Verdugo, M.A. Calvo, I.& Amor, A. (2019) Inclusive Education: The Way Forward. National Report: Spain. European Commission agreement 2017-3338/001-001.
Van Reusen, A. K. Shoho, A.R. y Barker, K.S. (2000). High school teacher attitudes toward inclusion. The High School Journal, 84 (2), 7–20.
VanTassel-Baska y Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and Possibilities for Serving Gifted Learners in the Regular Classroom. Theory Into Practice 44(3), 211–217.
Verdugo, M. A., Arias, B. y Jenaro, C. (1994). Actitudes hacia las personas con minusvalía. Madrid: Ministerio de Asuntos Sociales, Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales.
Vicuña, K. D. (2013). Percepciones y actitudes de profesores de primero a séptimo año de Educación General Básica del Distrito Educativo 4 hacia la inclusión del alumnado con necesidades educativas especiales como indicadores de uno de prácticas educativas inclusivas en el aula (Tesis doctoral, Universidad Casa Grande, Ecuador).
Winstanley, C. (2004). Too Clever by Half: A Fair Deal for Gifted Children. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books.)