Selective optimization with compensation and life-span gerontological intervention.
Main Article Content
Abstract
Technological, material, social and mental factors associated with Culture, and not genome changes due to evolution, were the main cause for the increase in longevity of the XX century. Selective optimization with compensation (SOC) can be considered as adaptive capacity – life management psychological strategies that lead to successful aging. Inspired in principles of Life Span Developmental Psyhcology, SOC is simultaneously a theoretical modeland a metamodel, in thesensethat itexplains both general mechanisms of human functioning and changes in specific domains. Baltes and cols. created an instrument to assess adaptive capacity – SOC Questionnaire, useful to gerontological life-span intervention – an optimizing view of developmental change throughout life based on life events. The present study examines SOC strategies in older adults that take part in initiatives promoted by municipalities. There are 104 participants, with a mean age of 72,6 years (SD = 5,9), predominantly women (80,8%), married (61,5%), with reduced education (84,6%). Data collection was performed with a sociodemographic questionnaire and the Portuguese version of the Soc Questionnaire. The analysis of adaptive capacity according to sociodemographic variables shows significant differences between women and men (p < 0,05), as well as a significant interaction between study group and school years (p < 0,01). Regardless of study group, women display lower scores
than men. Between individuals with fewer school years, SOC scores are higher in the intervention group, while among the more educated ones the comparison group has higher scores. This tendency in participants with more school years must be interpreted with caution since there are few participants in these strata. These results seem promising to plan life-span interventions, enhancing adaptive capacity throughout life in order to deal with stressful life situations, such as the COVID-10 Pandemic.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Baltes, M. & Carstensen, L. (1999). Social-psychological theoriesand theirapplicationsto aging: From individual to collective. In V. L.
Bengston, & K. W. Schaie, Handbook of Theories of Aging (209-226). Springer.
Baltes, P. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental Psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23(5), 611-626. 10.1037/0012-1649.23.5.611
Baltes, P. & Baltes, M. (1990). Psychological perspectives on successful aging: The model of selective optimization with compensation. In P. Baltes & M. Baltes (Eds.), Successful aging: Perspectives from the behavioural sciences (pp. 1-34). Cambridge University Press.
Baltes, P. & Danish, S. (1980). Intervention in life-span development and aging. In R. Turner & H. Reese (Eds), Life-span developmental psychology – Intervention (pp. 49-78). Academic Press.
Baltes, P., Lindenberger, U. & Staudinger, U. (2006). Life span theory in developmental psychology. In R. Lerner & W. Damon (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Theoretical models of human development (pp. 569- 664). John Wiley.
Baltes, P. & Smith, J. (2003). New frontiers in the future of aging: From successful aging of young old to the dilemmas of the fourth age. The Gerontologist, 49(2), 123-135. 10.1159/000067946
Baltes, P., Staudinger, U. & Lindenberger, U. (1999). Lifespan Psychology: Theory and application to intellectual functioning. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 471-507.
Bastos, A., Monteiro, J., Faria, C., Pimentel, H., Silva, S., & Afonso, C. (2020). Participação em programas de intervenção comunitária e qualidade de vida: Resultados de um estudo multicêntrico em Portugal. Revista Brasileira de Geriatria e Gerontologia, 23(6), Artigo e19007. 10.1590/1981-22562020023.190017
Carpentieri, J., Elliott, J., Brett, C. & Deary, I. (2017). Adapting to aging: Older people talk about their use of selection, optimization, and compensation to maximize well-being in the context of physical decline. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(2), 351-361, 10.1093/geronb/gbw132.
Donellan, C., Hevey, D., Hickey, A. & O’Neil, D. (2012). Adaptation to stroke using a model of successful aging. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(4), 530-547. 10.1080/13825585.2011.638976
Fratiglioni, L., Marseglia, A., & Dekhtyar, S. (2020). Ageing without dementia: Can stimulating psychosocial and lifestyle experiences make a difference? The Lancet, 9(6), 533-543, 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30039-9.
Freund, A., & Baltes, P. (1998). Selection, optimization, and compensation as strategies of life management: Correlations with subjective indicators of successful aging. Psychology and Aging, 13(4), 531– 543. 10.1037/0882-7974.13.4.531
Freund, A. & Baltes, P. (2002). Life-management strategies of selection, optimization and compensation: Measurement by self-report and construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(4), 642- 662. 10.1037/0022-3514.82.4.642
Hodge, K., Danish, S. & Martin, J. (2012). Developing a conceptual framework for life skills interventions. The Counseling Psychologist, 41(8), 1125-1152, 10.1177/0011000012462073.
Kliegl, R., Smith,J., & Baltes, P. (1989). Testing-the-limitsand thestudy ofadultage differencesin cognitive plasticity of a mnemonic skill. Developmental Psychology, 25(2), 247–256. 10.1037/0012-1649.25.2.247
Lindenberger, U. (2014). Human cognitive aging: corriger la fortune? Science, 346(6209), 572-578. 10.1126/science.1254403
Lindenberger, U., Marsiske, M., & Baltes, P. B. (2000). Memorizing while walking: Increase in dual-task costs from young adulthood to old age. Psychology and Aging, 15(3), 417–436. 10.1037/0882-7974.15.3.417
Moreira, B. (2019). A Otimização Seletiva com Compensação no processo de envelhecimento: Um estudo preliminar com o “SOC Questionnaire” IPVC-ESE. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11960/2219
Organização Mundial de Saúde(2015). World report on ageing and health. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/186463/9789240694811_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Paúl, C. (2020). Prefácio. In R. Benavente (Coord.), Intervençao psicológica em gerontologia (pp. XIII-XVI). Pactor.
Rozario, P., Kidahashi, M., DeRienzis, D. (2011). Selection, Optimization and compensation: Strategies to maintain, maximize, and generate resources in later life in face of chronic illnesses. Journal of Gerontological Social Work, 54(2), 224-239. 10.1080/01634372.2010.539589
Smith, J., & Baltes, P. (1990). Wisdom-related knowledge: Age/cohort differences in response to life-planning problems. Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 494–505. 10.1037/0012-1649.26.3.494
Sugarman, L. (2001). Life-span development: Frameworks, accounts and strategies. Routledge.
Viguer Segui, P. (2004). Optimizacion evolutiva: Fundamentos del desarrollo optimo. Ediciones Piramide.