Oratory and debate as enablers of critical thinking in post-pandemic times

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Dec 9, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2021.n2.v1.2180
Keywords:
critical thinking oratory debate post-pandemic times

Main Article Content

Carlos Robles Bonifacio
Departamento de Psicología evolutiva Universidad Villanueva, Madrid, España

Abstract

Introduction: Recent studies encourage us to insight into the development of the tools and skills that the debate and oratory provide us for the strengthening of the critical thinking. We are aware of the needs that we have in the current postpandemic times to facilitate our students a richer and more detailed vision of the reality. To be able to interpret that reality the better we can, enable us to make personal and social decisions to be more autonomous and responsible, thus, to be actually free. Goals: To insight into the oratory and debate concepts as adequate disciplines of the strengthening of the critical thinking. To link the critical thinking and the individual freedom as key concepts of the social and personal development. Aproach: In our memorandum we pretend to value and analyze the greatest numbers of variables involved in the debate and oratory discipline to lead us to a deeper development of the critical thinking. This memorandum has the goal to stablish the foundations for an statistic analysis that will allow us to relate oratory and debate with their implications in the improvement of the critical thinking.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Robles Bonifacio, C. (2021). Oratory and debate as enablers of critical thinking in post-pandemic times. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 1(2), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2021.n2.v1.2180
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): LEARNING IN A POSITIVE MOOD: OVERCOMING COVID
Section
Articles
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Bartolomé, M. (1992). Investigación cualitativa: ¿Comprender o transformar? Revista de investigación educativa, 20 (2), 7-36.

Bisquerra, R. (2009). Metodología de la investigación educativa. Madrid: La Muralla.

Cicerón . (2013). El Orador. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. California: Sage

Del Rincón, D. (1997). La metodología cualitativa orientada a la comprensión. Barcelona: EDIOUC.

Eisner, E. (1998). El ojo ilustrado. Indagación cualitativa y mejora de la práctica educativa. Barcelona: Paidós.

Fernández Aguado, J. (2009). Ética a Nicómaco de Aristóteles. Madrid: Lid.

León, O., y Montero , I. (2002). Métodos de investigación en Psicología y Educación. Madrid: McGrawHill.

Sandín, M. P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en Educación. Fundamentos y tradiciones. Madrid: McGrawHill.