The role of regulatory teaching in the induction of the engagement-bournot emotions of the university student

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Nov 29, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v4.598
Keywords:
Effective teaching regulatory teaching engagement-bournout stress university

Main Article Content

Jesús de la Fuente
Universidad de Almería
Lucía Zapata Sevillano
Universidad de Almería
Paul Sander
Cardiff Metropolitan University
David Putwain
Hedge Hill University

Abstract

Introduction. Traditionally, the research on engagement-bournout has linked this academic bipolar emotion with other characteristics of the students, already enumerated in previous communications. However, less has been deepened in the relationship with the teaching process. This relationship seems relevant and plausible in formal university academic contexts, especially when there is potential stress, is the objective of this research. Method. A total of 250 students from the University of Almería (Spain), corresponding to the second and fourth year, of Degree and Licentiate, respectively, participated in this investigation of an ex postfacto character. Regulatory education was evaluated through the Interactive Evaluation Scale of the Teaching-Learning Process, EIPEA, in its first dimension. The commitment-depletion was assessed through a validated Spanish version of the Marlach Bournout Inventory Survey-Utrech Work Engagement Scale for Students. The evaluation was carried out in a contextualized manner in two subjects of the Degree and Degree of Psychology Degree. The completion of the questionnaires was done anonymously, in class and in different weeks. Person's bivariate correlacutions were made, using an ex post-facto design. Results There appeared a significant positive partial association of some factors, such as specific regulatory education with dedication. The factor preparation for learning appeared associated with commitment, and its components, vigor and absorption. Discussion. The results partially validate the contrasted relationships, deepening in the need for the study of positive emotionality (engagement) or negative (exhaustion), as a product variable of the students, associated with the teaching process, which interacts with the motivational and cognitive processes of the students' learning. university.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
de la Fuente, J., Zapata Sevillano, L., Sander, P., & Putwain, D. (2014). The role of regulatory teaching in the induction of the engagement-bournot emotions of the university student. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 4(1), 149–154. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v4.598
Issue
Vol. 4 No. 1 (2014): THE PSYCHOLOGY OF TODAY
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Davis, H.A. (2006). Exploring the contexts of relationships quality between middle school students and teachers. The Elementary School Journal,106, 193-223.

De la Fuente, J. (2014). Teoría de la Auto vs. Hetero Regulación Personal® Manuscrito sin publicar. Almería: Universidad de Almería.

De la Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2007). The DEDEPRO Model of Regulated Teaching and Learning: recent advances. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 5(3), 535-564.

De la Fuente, J. y Martínez-Vicente, J. M. (2004). Escalas para la Evaluación Interactiva del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje, EIPEA. Manual Técnico y de Aplicación. Madrid: EOS.

De la Fuente, J., & Martínez-Vicente, J.M. (2007). Scales for Interactive Assessment of the Teaching-Learning Process, IATLP. Almería, Spain: Education and Psychology I+D+i, e-Publishing Series I+D+i®

De la Fuente, J., Sander, P., Cardelle-Elawar, M.C. y Justicia, F, (in review). Personal Self-Regulation and the Regulatory Teaching to predict the performance and academic confidence: new evidence for the DEDEPRO MODELTM. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 12(3).

De la Fuente, J., Zapata, L., Martínez-Vicente, J. M., Cardelle-Elawar, M., Sander, P., Justicia, F., Pichardo, M. C., & García-Berbén, A. B. (2012). Regulatory Teaching and Self-Regulated Learning in College Students: Confirmatory Validation Study of the IATLP Scales. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 10(2), 839-866.

Dolezal, S.E., Welsh, L.M., Pressley, M., & Vincent, M. (2003). How nine third-grade teachers motivate student academic engagement. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 239-267.

Friedricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109.

Goe, L., Bell, C. & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. Washington, DC: National Comprehensive Center for Teaching Quality. Retrieved from: http://tqcenter.learning.org/whatworks/WWWC08buildingCapacity/resources/Research_Synthesis.pdf

Guthrie, J.T., McRae, A., & Klauda, S.L. (2007). Contributions of Concept-Oriented Reading Instructions to knowledge about interventions for motivations in reading. Educational Psychologist, 42, 237-250.

Turner, J.C., Midgley, C., Meyer, D.K., Gheen, M., Anderman, E., Kang, Y., & Patrick, H. (2002). The classroom environment and students´reports of avoidance behaviours in mathematics: A multimethod study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 88-106.

Marks, K. M. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153-184.

Mckwon, C., & Weinstein, R. S. (2008). Teacher expectation, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261.

Reeve, J., Jang, H., Carrell, D., Jeon, S., & Barch, J. (2004). Enhancing students´engagement by increasing teachers´autonomy support. Motivation & Emotion, 28, 147-169.

Roeghrig, A. D., & Chistesen, E. (2010). Development and use of a tool for evaluating teacher effectiveness in grades K-12. In V. Shute & B. becker (Eds.), Innovative assessment for the 21st century: Supporting educational needs (pp. 207-228). New York, NY: Springer.

Roehrig, A.D., Turner, J.E., Arrastia, M.C., Christesen, E., McElhaney, S., & Jakiel, L.M. (2012). Effective teachers and teaching: Characteristics and practices related to positive student outcomes. In K.A. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook, vol 2. (pp. 501-527). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Rosiek, J., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Emotional scaffolding: The emotional and imaginative dimensions of teaching and learning. In P. A. Schutz & M Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (pp. 165-194). New York, NY: Springer.

Schunk, D.H., Pintrich, P.R., & Meece, J.J. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Shernoff, D. (2012). Engagement and positive youth development: Creating optimal learning environments. In K.R. Harris, S. Graham, & T. Urdan (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook, vol. 2 (pp. 195-220). Washington: American Psychological Association.

Turner, J.C., & Patrick, H. (2004). Motivational influences on students participation in classroom learning activities. Teachers College Records, 106, 1759-1785.

Yassie-Mintz, E. (2010). Charting the path from engagement to achvement: A report of the 2009 High School Survey of Student Engagement. Bloomintong, IN: Center for Evaluation & Education Policy.

Zapata, L. (2013). Personal Self-regulation, Learning Approaches and Coping Strategies in University Process with Stress. Dissertation Doctoral Thesis with International Mention. Almería: University of Almería. November.