The conceptions of the university teacher and the evaluation: genesis and development of the application of a methodological approach

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Dec 21, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v5.681
Keywords:
University teaching evaluation of learning qualitative approach case analysis ATLAS ti

Main Article Content

José Ignacio Moraza Herrán
Universidad de Burgos
Ascensión Antón Nuño
Universidad de Burgos

Abstract

Teaching is a complex work that studies from very diverse methodologic approaches. The decisions that the investigator makes when he tries to understand and to explain a phenomenon they always have consequences. Perhaps most important, when a phenomenon is investigated like this, it is the level of depth and complexity that is tried to reach. Options that allows to gather and to study better how they live and the protagonists explain themselves their professional experiences are of qualitative character. The use of this route demands a solid theoretical formation and practical the investigator, the rigorous control of the methodologic decisions that are taken and the capacity to describe of form need the passage crossed in the accomplishment of the work. To present/display that way is the object of this communication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Moraza Herrán, J. I., & Antón Nuño, A. (2014). The conceptions of the university teacher and the evaluation: genesis and development of the application of a methodological approach. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 5(1), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v5.681
Issue
Vol. 5 No. 1 (2014): THE POWER OF EMOTIONS: POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Argüello, A. (2009). Fenomenografía y perspectivas biográficas en la investigación educativa: un acercamiento epistemológico. X Congreso Nacional de investigación educativa. Veracruz (México). Recuperado de

Bennet, R. (2005). Factors associated with plagiarism in a post-1992 university. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 30 (2), 137-162.

Biggs, J. B., Kember, D. y Leung, D. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: RSPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.

Bisquerra, R. (2000). Métodos de investigación. Barcelona: CEAC.

Blaxter, L., Hughes, C. y Tight, M. (2008). Cómo se investiga. Barcelona: Graó.

Bolívar, A. (2001). La investigación biográfico-narrativa en educación. Enfoque y metodología. Madrid: La Muralla.

Bos, W. y Tarnai, C. (1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (8), 659-671.

Buendía, L., Colás, M. P. y Hernández Pina, F. (1998). Métodos de investigación en psicopedagogía. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

Burns, R. (2000). Introduction to Research Methods. London: Sage.

Creswell, J. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design. Choosing among five traditions. USA: Sage.

De Corte, E., Eynde, P y Verschaffel, L. (2002). Knowing what to believe: The relevance of students´ mathematical beliefs for mathematics education. En Hofer, B.K.; Pintrich, P. (Ed.). Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing. Mahwah, NJ. LEA.

Flick, U. (2004). Introducción a la investigación educativa. Madrid: Morata.

Fontana, A. y Frey, J. (2000). From structured questions to negotiated text. En N. K. Denzin y Y. .S. Lincoln (Ed.). The handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage. pp. 645-672.

Hernández-Sampieri, R; Fernández, C. y Baptista, P. (2003). Metodología de la Investigación. México. D.F.: McGraw-Hill.

http://www.postgrado.unesr.edu.ve/acontece/es/todosnumeros/num15/01_06/0458-F.pdf

Hunheide, K. (1988). Metacontracts for situational definitions and for definitions of cognitive skills. Quarterly Newsletter of the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, 10 (3), 85-91.

Kloosterman, P. (2002). Beliefs about mathematics and mathematics learning in the secondary school: measurement and implications for motivation. En G. Leder, E. Pehkonen y G. Törner (Ed.) (2002). Beliefs: a hidden variable inmathematics education? Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA.

Marton, F. (1981). Phenomenography - describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.

Marton, F. (1995). Fenomenografía: una perspectiva de investigación para averiguar comprensiones diferentes en la realidad. En Sherman y Webb (Ed.). Qualitative research in education: Forms and methods. Londres: The Falmer Press.

Marton, F. y Saljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning-I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psichology. 46, 4-11.

Marton, F. y Saljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning-II: Outcome as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psichology. 46, 115-127.

Marton, F., Dall´Alba, G. y Beaty, E. (1993) Conception of learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 19, 277-300.

Mason, J. (1996). Qualitative Researching. London. Sage.

Mason, J. (2006). Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research, 6 (1), 9-26.

McMillan, J. H. y Schumacher, S. (2005). Investigación educativa. Madrid: Pearson.

Moreno, M. y Azcárate, C. (2003). Concepciones y creencias de los profesores universitarios de matemáticas acerca de la enseñanza de las ecuaciones diferenciales. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21 (2), 265-280.

Moya, J., Rincón, D., Valcárcel, M., Escudero, T. y Benito, M. (2005). Formación de profesores y gestores para la armonización europea en educación superior: aportaciones de la investigación a la innovación. En Actas del XII Congreso Nacional de Modelos de Investigación Educativa.

Muñoz, J. (2005). Análisis cualitativo de datos textuales con ATLAS.ti 5.0. Barcelona: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.

Murillo Torrecilla, F.J. (2010). Hacer de la educación un ámbito basado en evidencias científicas. Revista Electrónica Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación (REICE). Recuperado de http://www.rinace.net/reice/numeros/arts/vol9num3/editorial.htm

Pecharromán, I. (2004). Teorías epistemológicas implícitas en diferentes dominios: influencia de variables relacionadas con la instrucción. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. España.

Pérez, G. (2001). Investigación cualitativa. Retos e interrogantes. Madrid: La Muralla.

Perrenoud, P. H. (1990). La construcción del éxito y del fracaso escolar. Madrid: Paideia-Morata.

Pozo, J.I.; Scheuer, N.; Pérez, M.P.; Mateos, M.; Martín, E.; De la Cruz, M. (2006). Nuevas formas de pensar la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Madrid: Graó.

Remesal, A. (2006). Los problemas en la evaluación del aprendizaje matemático en la educación obligatoria: perspectiva de profesores y alumnos. Tesis Doctoral. Universidad de Barcelona. España.

Remesal, A. (2009). Concepciones del profesorado de matemáticas acerca de las funciones de la evaluación del aprendizaje de en la educación obligatoria. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 32 (3), 391-404

Rodríguez, G.; Gil, J. y García, E. (1996). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Granada: Aljibe.

Ruiz Olabuenaga, J.I. (1999). Metodología de la investigación cualitativa. Bilbao: Universidad de Deusto.

Sandín, M.P. (2003). Investigación cualitativa en Educación. Fundamentos y tradicciones. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.

Schraw, G. y Olafson, L. (2003). Teacher’s Epistemological World Views and Educational Practices. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3 (2), 178-235.

Stake, R. (1999). Investigación con estudio de casos. Segunda Edición. Madrid: Morata.

Stake, R. (2005). Qualitative case studies. En N. Denzin y Y. Lincoln. The Sage handboock of Qualitative research. Tercera Edición. London: Sage Publications.

Stenhouse, L. (1990). Conducción, análisis y presentación del estudio de casos en la investigación educativa y evaluación. En J. Martínez. Hacia un enfoque interpretativo de la enseñanza. Granada: Universidad de Granada.

Thomas, R. M. (2003). These and dissertations. A guide to planning, research and writing. London: Bergin and Garvey.

Thomas, R. M. y Brubaker, D. L. (2000). Blending qualitative and quantitative research methods in these and dissertations. Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

Wittrock, M.C (1990). La investigación de la enseñanza, III. Barcelona: Paidós.

Yates, L. (1997). Research methodology, education, and theoretical fashions: constructing a methodology course in an era of deconstruction. Qualitative Studies in Education, 10 (4), 487-498.

Yin, R. (2003). Case study research. Disign and methods. USA: Sage Publications.