Spanish adaptation and validation of Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale (CCBS)

Main Article Content

Rubén Trigueros-Ramos
Juan Miguel Fernández-Campoy
Antonio Alías
José Manuel Aguilar-Parra
Mª Carmen Lozano Segura

Abstract

The aim of this study was to validate and adapt the Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale (CCBS). In the study 444 high school students with a mean age of 15.3 years were involved. The analysis confirmatory factorial revealed adequate adjustment indices for the new version of the scale, showing the invariant factor structure with respect to sex. The factors that make up the scale obtained a high internal consistency and temporary stability. The analysis of criterion validity showed that intimidation and control through rewards significantly predicted demotivation, with a positive regression weight. This new instrument can help to analyze with validity and reliability the interpersonal style of physical education teacher control over students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Trigueros-Ramos, R., Fernández-Campoy, J. M., Alías, A., Aguilar-Parra, J. M., & Lozano Segura, M. C. (2017). Spanish adaptation and validation of Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale (CCBS). International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 2(1), 417–428. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v2.954
Section
Articles

References

Adie J., Duda J.L. y Ntoumanis N. (2012) Perceived coach autonomy support, basic need satisfaction and the well- and ill-being of elite youth soccer players: a longitudinal investigation. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 51-59.

Bartholomew, K.J., Ntoumanis, N., y Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2010). The controlling interpersonal style in a coaching context: Development and initial validation of a psychometric scale. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 31, 193-216.

Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., y Thøgersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-Determination theory and the darker side of athletic experience: The role of interpersonal control and need thwarting. Sport and Exercise Psychology Review, 7, 23-27.

Bartholomew, K., Ntoumanis, N., Ryan, R., Bosch, J., y Thogersen-Ntoumani, C. (2011). Self-Determination theory and diminished functioning: The role of interpersonal control and psychological need thwarting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 1459-1473.

Bentler, P. M. (1989). EQS structural equations program manual. Los Angeles: BMDP Statistical Software.

Browne, M. W. y Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. Bollen y J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, applications and programming. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Castillo, I., Tomás, I., Ntoumanis, N., Bartholomew, K., Duda, J. L., y Balaguer, I. (2014). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la Escala de Conductas Controladoras del Entrenador en el contexto deportivo. Psicothema, 26(3), 409-414.

Chelladurai, P. y Riemer, H. A. (1997). A classification of the facets of athlete satisfaction. Journal of Sport Management, 11, 133-159.

Deci, E. L., y Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the selfdetermination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

Ferguson, Y. L., Kasser, T., y Jahng, S. (2011). Differences in life satisfaction and school satisfaction among adolescents from three nations: The role of perceived autonomy support. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 21, 649–661.

Hagger, M.S., Chatzisarantis, N.L.D., Hein, V., Pihu, M., Soós, I., y Karsai, I. (2007). The perceived autonomy support scale for exercise settings (PASSES): Development, validity and cross-cultural invariance in young people. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8, 632-653.

Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Adaptación de tests para su uso en diferentes idiomas y culturas: fuentes de error, posibles soluciones y directrices prácticas. En J. Muñiz (Ed.), Psicometría (pp. 207-238). Madrid: Universitas.

Hu, L. y Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.

Jöreskog, K. G. y Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc.

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382-385.

Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Conde, C., y Sáenz-López, P. (2012). Importancia del apoyo de autonomía en la figura del docente en educación física. Tándem, 40, 18-27.

Moreno-Murcia, J. A., y Huéscar, E. (2012). Relación del tipo de feed-back del docente con la percepción de autonomía del alumnado en clases de educación física. Infancia y Aprendizaje, 3 (1), 87-98.

Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Huéscar, E., y Cervelló, E. (2012). Prediction of adolescents doing physical activity after completing secondary education. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 15, 90-100.

Moreno-Murcia, J. A., Huéscar, E., Peco, N., Alarcón, E., y Cervelló, E. (2013). Relación del feed-back y las barreras de comunicación del docente con la motivación intrínseca de estudiantes adolescentes de educación física. Anales de psicología, 1(29), 257-263.

Ntoumanis, N. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on motivation in sport and physical education: Current trends and possible future research directions. En G . C. Roberts y D. C. Treasure (Eds.), Motivation in sport and exercise: Volumen 3 (pp. 91-128). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.

Ryan, R.M., y Deci, E.L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic dialectical perspective. In E.L. Deci y R.M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 3-33). Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press.

Sánchez-Oliva, D., Leo, F. M., Amado, D., Cuevas, R., y García-Calvo, T. (2013). Desarrollo y validación del cuestionario de apoyo a las necesidades psicológicas básicas en educación física.Motricidad. European Journal of Human Movement, 30, 53-71.

Schumacker, R. E. & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.