An evidence based research model on scholastic inclusion in Italy

Main Article Content

MARIANGELA CATURANO

Abstract

What is inclusive education? How you can support the development of a system that favors the inclusion in the daily school reality? On a sample of 162 students, aged 8 to 16 years, they want to measure the effects of effective teaching methods such as feedback, formative evaluation, collaborative learning, digital technology. Estimated variables are the skills and abilities to cross disciplines, cognitive-emotional factors of academic success, self-esteem. Rating bio psychosocial which opposes the prevailing bio-medical evaluation in Italy. Observe all students, to transform the special response in normal, measure the variables of the school environment favorable to the inclusion in Italy improves the effectiveness of a welfare amounted to € 4,7B. Here we build a model, whose experimental design requires methodologies recognized at international and European level as the evidence-based education (EBE), necessary to compare the results and replicate the model in a supranational context. The results will become part of the pilot project of the European Agency For Special Needs started in three countries, including Italy, and which will be concluded in October 2016.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
CATURANO, M. (2016). An evidence based research model on scholastic inclusion in Italy. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 1(1), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n1.v1.159
Section
Articles
Author Biography

MARIANGELA CATURANO, Universidad de Extremadura

Dottoranda in psicologia matricola n. AT3576359 Universidad de Extremadura prof. Florencio Vicente Castro

References

Associazione TREELLE, Caritas Italiana, Fondazione Agnelli (2011). Gli alunni con disabilità nella scuola italiana: bilancio e proposte. Trento: Erickson.

Ainscow M. (2007). From special education to effective schools for all: a review of the progress so far. The Sage Handbook of Special Education . London: Sage.

Booth T., Ainscow M. (2002). Index for inclusion: developing learning and participation in schools. Bristol: Centre for Studies on Inclusive Education.

Bruce A. Bracken. (2003) TMA – Test di valutazione multidimensionale dell’autostima. Trento: Erickson.

Calvani A. (2012). Per un’istruzione evidence based. Analisi teorico – metodologica internazionale sulle didattiche efficaci e inclusive. Trento: Erickson.

Canevaro A, D’Alonzo L., Ianes D. (2009). L’integrazione scolastica di alunni con disabilità dal 1977 al 2007. Bolzano:Bolzano University Press.

Canevaro A., D’Alonzo L., Ianes D., Caldin R. (2011). L’integrazione scolastica nella percezione degli insegnanti. Trento : Erickson.

Canevaro A. (2014). Scuola inclusive e mondo più giusto. Trento: Erickson.

Celi F. (2003). Fare ricerca sperimentale nella scuola. Trento: Erickson.

Cornoldi C. et al. (2010, 2011, 2012). Prove di lettura MT-2 per la scuola primaria, Nuove prove di lettura MT per la scuola secondaria di I grado, MT Avanzate- 2. Firenze: Giunti

Cottini L.(2003).Psicomotricità. Valutazione e metodi di intervento. Roma : Carocci.

Cottini L.(2007).Didattica speciale e integrazione scolastica. Roma : Carocci.

Cottini L.(2008). Autismo: dalla ricerca all’intervento. Brescia : Vannini.

Cottini L, Morganti A. (2015). Evidence-Based Education e pedagogia speciale. Roma : Carocci.

Council for Exceptional Children (2014). Standards for Evidence Based Practices in Special Education. www.cec.sped.org

D’Alessio, S., Watkins A. (2009). International Comparisons of Inclusive Policy and Practice – are we talking about the same thing? Research in Comparative and International Education, 4 (3), 233–249.

Demo H. (2014). Il fenomeno del push e pull out nell’integrazione scolastica italiana. L’integrazione scolastica e sociale anno II, n.2.

Education Endowment Foundation. Teaching and Learning Toolkit. http://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk

European Agency for Development in Special Needs Education (2014). RA4AL - Five Key Messages for Inclusive Education. Putting Theory into Practice. http://www.european-agency.org

Gherardini P., Nocera S., AIPD (2000). L’integrazione scolastica delle persone Down. Trento:Erickson.

Goussot A. (2014). Quale evoluzione per il sostegno? Italian Journal of Special Education for Inclusion, anno II, n.2.

Hattie J.(2009). Visible Learning : A Syntesis of over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. London – New York: Routledge.

Ianes, D. (2005). Bisogni Educativi Speciali e inclusione. Valutare le reali necessità e attivare le risorse. Trento: Erickson

Mitchell D. (2008). What really works in special and inclusive education. Using evidence-based teaching strategies. London - New York: Routledge.

Mitchell, D. (2005). Contextualizing Inclusive Education. Evaluating old and new international perspectives. London - New York: Routledge.

Trinchero R. (2002). Manuale di ricerca educativa. Milano: Franco Angeli.

UNESCO (1994). The Salamanca Statement and Framework for Action on Special Needs Education. Salamanca: UNESCO.

UNESCO (2009). Policy Guidelines on Inclusion in Education. Paris: UNESCO

Unicef (2013). Children with disabilities. The state of the World's Children 2013. Paris: UNICEF.

Ufficio Scolastico Regionale per la Lombardia (2015). Progetto QUADIS. www.quadis.it

Vermigli P., Travaglia G., Alcini A., Galluccio M. (2002).ACESS - Analisi degli indicatori cognitivo-emozionali del successo scolastico. Trento: Erickson.

Wing Institute. Evidence Based Education Roadmap – Research to Practice. http://winginstitute.org

World Health Organization/World Bank (2011). World Report on Disability. Geneva