Gender positivity in sicilian preadolescents: gender differences in life skills, well-being, and coping strategies
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Laburpena
The aim of this study is focused on the analysis of gender differences in psychological well-being, self-efficacy in life skills, and coping strategies in a sample of 550 Sicilian preadolescents between 11 and 14 years old (264 boys and 286 girls). Measures: 1) Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (Andolfi et al., 2017) to examine the dimensions of psychological well-being; 2) Self-Efficacy in Life Skills Scales (Sagone & Indiana, 2017) to analyze problem solving ability, interpersonal and social communication ability, and managing of positive and negative emotions; 3) Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist (Camisasca et al., 2012) to study the coping. Results indicated significant differences for gender in the following dimensions: boys show higher levels of psychological well-being than girls, reporting high sense of belonging (t=2.620, p=.009) and optimism (t=2.761, p=.006) and being more satisfied with their life (t=2.340, p=.020); further, boys express negative emotions more than girls (t=4.081, p<.001) while girls report higher loneliness than boys (t=-3.108, p=.002). In relation to self-efficacy in life skills, boys perceive themselves highly efficient in managing of negative emotions (t=3.766, p<.001), while girls consider themselves highly efficient in interpersonal and social communication (t=-3.208, p=.001). Lastly, with reference to coping strategies, boys avoid critical situations trying to suppress them (t=3.716, p<.001), while girls think that things will improve in the end (t=-2.369, p=.018). Future research will deep the relationships among the analyzed topics in groups of adolescents of high schools and young adults.
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Erreferentziak
Andolfi, V. R., Tay, L., Confalonieri, E., & Traficante, D. (2017). Assessing Well-Being in Children: Italian Adaptation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving for Children (CIT-CHILD). TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24(1), 127-145.
Ayers, T. A., & Sandler, I. N. (1999, September). Manual for the Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist & how I coped under pressure scale. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from Arizona State Prevention Research Center Web site: http//www.asu.edu/clas/asuprc/.
Benjet, C., & Hernandez-Guzman, L. (2001). Gender differences in psychological well-being of Mexican early adolescents. Adolescence, 36(141), 47-65.
Camisasca, E., Caravita, S., Milani, L., & Di Blasio, P. (2012). The Children’s Coping Strategies ChecklistRevision1: A validation study in the Italian population. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19(3), 197-218.
Caprara, G. V. (Ed.). (2001). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Trento (Italy): Erickson.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525–534.
Caprara, G. V., Gerbino, M., & Delle Fratte, A. (2001), Autoefficacia interpersonale. In G.V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti (pp. 51-62). Trento: Erickson.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Gerbino, M., Paciello, M., & Vecchio, G. M. (2006). Looking for Adolescents’ Well-being: Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Positive Thinking and Happiness. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 15, 30-43.
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100,185-207.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective Well-Being. In E. Diener (Ed), The Science of Well-Being (Vol. 37, pp. 11-58). New York: Springer.
Duan, W., Guan, Y., &Gan, F. (2016). Brief Inventory of Thriving: A comprehensive measure of well-being. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 1 (1), 15–31.
Eisenbarth, C.A. (2019). Coping with Stress: Gender Differences among College Students, College Student Journal, 53(2), 151-162.
Eschenbeck, H., & Kohlmann, C.-W. (2002). Geschlechtsunterschiedein der Stressbewältigung von Grundschulkindern[Gender differences in coping strategies in childhood]. Zeitschriftfür Gesundheitspsychologie, 10, 1–7.
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C. W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences,28(1), 18-26.
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., Lohaus, A., & Klein-Heßling, J. (2006). The assessment of coping with the “German Stress and Coping Questionnaire in Children andAdolescents” (SSKJ 3–8): Factorial and psychometric analyses. Diagnostica, 52, 131–142.
Graves, B. S., Hall, M. E., Dias-Karch, C., Haischer, M. H., & Apter, C. (2021). Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PloSone, 16(8), e0255634.
Griffith, M.A., Dubow, E.F., & Ippolito, M.F. (2000). Developmental and cross-situational differences in adolescents’ coping strategies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 183–204.
Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,34, 73–83.
Hausler, M., Huber, A., Strecker, C., Brenner, M., Hoege, T., & Hoefer, S. (2017). Validation of a holistic measure for the construct of well-being-The German version of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the short version Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Diagnostica, 63(3), 219-228.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lucas, R. E., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2006). Does the Existence of Social Relationships Matter for Subjective WellBeing? In K. D. Vohs, & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes (pp. 254-273). New York: Guilford Press.
Matud, M. P., López-Curbelo, M., & Fortes, D. (2019). Gender and psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3531
Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G. M., & Boda, G. (2001). Autoefficacia nelle life skills: Soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti (pp. 137-146). Trento: Erickson.
Remillard, A. M., & Lamb, S. (2005). Adolescent girls’ coping with relational aggression. Sex Roles, 53(3), 221-229.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology,52(1), 141-166.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6), 1069- 1081.
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10-28.
Sagone, E., & Indiana, M. L. (2017). Therelationship of positiveaffect with resilienceand self-efficacyin lifeskills in Italian adolescents. Psychology, 8, 2226–2239.
Sagone, E., De Caroli, M. E., & Indiana, M. L. (2018). Psychological well-being and self-efficacy in life skills among Italian preadolescents with positive body esteem: Preliminary results of an intervention project. Psychology, 9(06), 1383-1396.
Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well Being,6(3), 251-279.
Villanueva, L., Prado-Gascó, V., & Montoya-Castilla, I. (2022). Longitudinal analysis of subjective well-being in preadolescents: The role of emotional intelligence, self-esteem and perceived stress. Journal of Health Psychology,27(2), 278-291.
Wiese, C. W., Tay, L., Su, R., & Diener, E. (2018). Measuring Thriving across Nations: Examining the Measurement Equivalence of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 10, 127-148.
World Health Organization (2003). Skills for Health, Information Series on School Health, Document Number 9.
Zach, S., Yazdi-Ugav, O., & Zeev, A. (2016). Academic achievements, behavioural problems, and loneliness as predictors of social skills among students with and without learning disorders. School Psychology International,37(4), 378-396.