Gender positivity in sicilian preadolescents: gender differences in life skills, well-being, and coping strategies
Barre latérale de l'article
Contenu principal de l'article
Résumé
The aim of this study is focused on the analysis of gender differences in psychological well-being, self-efficacy in life skills, and coping strategies in a sample of 550 Sicilian preadolescents between 11 and 14 years old (264 boys and 286 girls). Measures: 1) Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (Andolfi et al., 2017) to examine the dimensions of psychological well-being; 2) Self-Efficacy in Life Skills Scales (Sagone & Indiana, 2017) to analyze problem solving ability, interpersonal and social communication ability, and managing of positive and negative emotions; 3) Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist (Camisasca et al., 2012) to study the coping. Results indicated significant differences for gender in the following dimensions: boys show higher levels of psychological well-being than girls, reporting high sense of belonging (t=2.620, p=.009) and optimism (t=2.761, p=.006) and being more satisfied with their life (t=2.340, p=.020); further, boys express negative emotions more than girls (t=4.081, p<.001) while girls report higher loneliness than boys (t=-3.108, p=.002). In relation to self-efficacy in life skills, boys perceive themselves highly efficient in managing of negative emotions (t=3.766, p<.001), while girls consider themselves highly efficient in interpersonal and social communication (t=-3.208, p=.001). Lastly, with reference to coping strategies, boys avoid critical situations trying to suppress them (t=3.716, p<.001), while girls think that things will improve in the end (t=-2.369, p=.018). Future research will deep the relationships among the analyzed topics in groups of adolescents of high schools and young adults.
Téléchargements
Details de l'article
Ce travail est disponible sous licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Références
Andolfi, V. R., Tay, L., Confalonieri, E., & Traficante, D. (2017). Assessing Well-Being in Children: Italian Adaptation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving for Children (CIT-CHILD). TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 24(1), 127-145.
Ayers, T. A., & Sandler, I. N. (1999, September). Manual for the Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist & how I coped under pressure scale. Retrieved June 10, 2006, from Arizona State Prevention Research Center Web site: http//www.asu.edu/clas/asuprc/.
Benjet, C., & Hernandez-Guzman, L. (2001). Gender differences in psychological well-being of Mexican early adolescents. Adolescence, 36(141), 47-65.
Camisasca, E., Caravita, S., Milani, L., & Di Blasio, P. (2012). The Children’s Coping Strategies ChecklistRevision1: A validation study in the Italian population. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 19(3), 197-218.
Caprara, G. V. (Ed.). (2001). La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Trento (Italy): Erickson.
Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525–534.
Caprara, G. V., Gerbino, M., & Delle Fratte, A. (2001), Autoefficacia interpersonale. In G.V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti (pp. 51-62). Trento: Erickson.
Caprara, G. V., Steca, P., Gerbino, M., Paciello, M., & Vecchio, G. M. (2006). Looking for Adolescents’ Well-being: Self-Efficacy Beliefs as Determinants of Positive Thinking and Happiness. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 15, 30-43.
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Freire, T., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Wissing, M. (2011). The eudaimonic and hedonic components of happiness: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Social Indicators Research, 100,185-207.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542-575.
Diener, E. (2009). Subjective Well-Being. In E. Diener (Ed), The Science of Well-Being (Vol. 37, pp. 11-58). New York: Springer.
Duan, W., Guan, Y., &Gan, F. (2016). Brief Inventory of Thriving: A comprehensive measure of well-being. Chinese Sociological Dialogue, 1 (1), 15–31.
Eisenbarth, C.A. (2019). Coping with Stress: Gender Differences among College Students, College Student Journal, 53(2), 151-162.
Eschenbeck, H., & Kohlmann, C.-W. (2002). Geschlechtsunterschiedein der Stressbewältigung von Grundschulkindern[Gender differences in coping strategies in childhood]. Zeitschriftfür Gesundheitspsychologie, 10, 1–7.
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C. W., & Lohaus, A. (2007). Gender differences in coping strategies in children and adolescents. Journal of Individual Differences,28(1), 18-26.
Eschenbeck, H., Kohlmann, C.-W., Lohaus, A., & Klein-Heßling, J. (2006). The assessment of coping with the “German Stress and Coping Questionnaire in Children andAdolescents” (SSKJ 3–8): Factorial and psychometric analyses. Diagnostica, 52, 131–142.
Graves, B. S., Hall, M. E., Dias-Karch, C., Haischer, M. H., & Apter, C. (2021). Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PloSone, 16(8), e0255634.
Griffith, M.A., Dubow, E.F., & Ippolito, M.F. (2000). Developmental and cross-situational differences in adolescents’ coping strategies. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 183–204.
Hampel, P., & Petermann, F. (2005). Age and gender effects on coping in children and adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,34, 73–83.
Hausler, M., Huber, A., Strecker, C., Brenner, M., Hoege, T., & Hoefer, S. (2017). Validation of a holistic measure for the construct of well-being-The German version of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the short version Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Diagnostica, 63(3), 219-228.
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.
Lucas, R. E., & Dyrenforth, P. S. (2006). Does the Existence of Social Relationships Matter for Subjective WellBeing? In K. D. Vohs, & E. J. Finkel (Eds.), Self and Relationships: Connecting Intrapersonal and Interpersonal Processes (pp. 254-273). New York: Guilford Press.
Matud, M. P., López-Curbelo, M., & Fortes, D. (2019). Gender and psychological well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19), 3531
Pastorelli, C., Vecchio, G. M., & Boda, G. (2001). Autoefficacia nelle life skills: Soluzione dei problemi e comunicazione interpersonale. In G. V. Caprara (Ed.), La valutazione dell’autoefficacia. Costrutti e strumenti (pp. 137-146). Trento: Erickson.
Remillard, A. M., & Lamb, S. (2005). Adolescent girls’ coping with relational aggression. Sex Roles, 53(3), 221-229.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology,52(1), 141-166.
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6), 1069- 1081.
Ryff, C. D. (2014). Psychological Well-Being Revisited: Advances in the Science and Practice of Eudaimonia. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 83, 10-28.
Sagone, E., & Indiana, M. L. (2017). Therelationship of positiveaffect with resilienceand self-efficacyin lifeskills in Italian adolescents. Psychology, 8, 2226–2239.
Sagone, E., De Caroli, M. E., & Indiana, M. L. (2018). Psychological well-being and self-efficacy in life skills among Italian preadolescents with positive body esteem: Preliminary results of an intervention project. Psychology, 9(06), 1383-1396.
Su, R., Tay, L., & Diener, E. (2014). The development and validation of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well Being,6(3), 251-279.
Villanueva, L., Prado-Gascó, V., & Montoya-Castilla, I. (2022). Longitudinal analysis of subjective well-being in preadolescents: The role of emotional intelligence, self-esteem and perceived stress. Journal of Health Psychology,27(2), 278-291.
Wiese, C. W., Tay, L., Su, R., & Diener, E. (2018). Measuring Thriving across Nations: Examining the Measurement Equivalence of the Comprehensive Inventory of Thriving (CIT) and the Brief Inventory of Thriving (BIT). Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 10, 127-148.
World Health Organization (2003). Skills for Health, Information Series on School Health, Document Number 9.
Zach, S., Yazdi-Ugav, O., & Zeev, A. (2016). Academic achievements, behavioural problems, and loneliness as predictors of social skills among students with and without learning disorders. School Psychology International,37(4), 378-396.