The “questionnaire of the difference imaginary baby vs. real baby”: a new instrument for the evaluation of differences between prenatal and postnatal maternal perceptions after delivery
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Laburpena
INTRODUCTION: Fantasmatic baby, imaginary baby and the real baby are important concepts for the understanding of the psychological life of pregnant women as of newly mothers.
GOAL: To present a new psychometric instrument for the assessment of the difference between imaginary baby and real baby by the first days after delivery.
METHOD: Generation of 30 items about the difference between imaginary baby and real baby related to five main areas of newborns’ life: feeding, sleeping, interaction, baby characteristics and temperament.
PARTICIPANTS: The “Questionnaire of the Difference Imaginary Baby vs. Real Baby” (QDIBRB) was applied to a sample (N = 190) of newly mothers at Maternidade Dr. Alfredo da Costa in Lisbon.
RESULTS: After a series of factorial analysis, Equamax rotation with extraction forced to 4 factors (explaining 52.7% of total variance) provided 3 factors about differences between maternal prenatal and postnatal perceptions on the following areas: F1 - babies’ positive emotional expressions (α = .881), F2 - maternal fears related with babies’ behavioral meaning (α = .850) and F3 - babies’ appealing behavior (α = .783). For the complete scale internal consistency is excellent (α = .921).
CONCLUSION: The QDIBRB seems to be able to assess differences between the imaginary baby and the real baby in a psychometric way. Future research is needed to show if data collected with QDIBRB are useful in the world of perinatal psychology
##plugins.generic.usageStats.downloads##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Erreferentziak
Bibring, G. (1959). Some considerations of the psychological processes in pregnancy. The Psychoanalytical Study of the Child, 14, 113-121.
Bibring, G., Dwyer, T., Huntington, D., & Valenstein, A. (1961-a). A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother-child relationship – I. Some propositions and comments. The Psychoanalytical Study of the Child, 16, 9-24.
Bibring, G., Dwyer, T., Huntington, D., & Valenstein, A. (1961-b). A study of the psychological processes in pregnancy and of the earliest mother-child relationship – II. Methodological considerations.
The Psychoanalytical Study of the Child, 16, 25-72.
Bowlby, J. (1958). The nature of the child’s tie to his mother. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 39, 350-373.
Campbell, S. (2002). 4D, or not 4D: that is the question. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology, 19, 1-4.
Chagas, C. (2014). Bebé imaginário vs. bebé real: Qual a influência na percepção materna dos comportamentos do recém-nascido e no nível de confiança nos cuidados a prestar ao bebé? Master Thesis in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lisbon University.
Colman, A., & Colman, L. (1971). Pregnancy: the psychological experience. New York: Herder and Herder.
De Vries, J. I. P., & Fong, B. F. (2006). Normal fetal motility: an overview. Ultrasound Obstetrics and Gynecology, 27, 701-711.
Einspieler, C., Prayer, D., & Prechtl, H. (2012). Fetal behavior: a neurodevelopmental approach. London: Mac Keith Press.
Graffar, M. (1956). Une méthode de classification sociale d’échantillons de population. Courrier du Centre International de l’Enfance, 6(8), 455-459.
Harlow, H. F. (1958). The nature of love. American Psychologist, 13(12), 673-685.
Jardri, R., Houfflin-Debarge, V., Delion, P., Pruvo, J.-P., Thomas, P., & Pins, D. (2012). Assessing fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 30, 159-161.
Justo, J. (2014). A defensive “stand-by reaction” at critical moments of the reproductive life cycle. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Nº 1, Vol. 4, 209-214.
Lebovici, S. (1988). Fantasmatic interaction and intergenerational transmission. Infant Mental Health Journal, 9(1), 10-19.
Lebovici, S. (1995). Les interactions fantasmatiques. Journal de Pédiatrie et de Puériculture, 2, 94-98.
Maltez, P. (2015). A percepção materna da diferença entre bebé imaginário e bebé real seguindo o número de gestações, o estado emocional e as experiências obstétricas anteriores. Master Thesis in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lisbon University.
Marx, V. & Nagy, E. (2015). Fetal behavioural responses to maternal voice and touch. PLoS ONE, 10(6): e0129118. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129118
Miranda, S. (2014). Perceção das mães adolescentes sobre a diferença entre o bebé imaginário e o bebé real e o seu envolvimento afetivo. Master Thesis in Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, Lisbon University.
Singh, K. (2010). Fetal face. Donald School Journal of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 4(4), 361-372.
Walusinzski, O., Kurjak, A., Andonotopo, W., & Azumendi, G. (2005). Fetal yawning assessed by 3D and 4D sonography. The Ultrasound Review of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5(3), 210-217. DOI: 10.1080/14722240500284070
Zoia, S., Blason, L., D’Ottavio, G., Bulgheroni, M., Pezzetta, E., Scabar, A., & Castiello, U. (2007). Evidence of early development of action planning in the human foetus: a kinematic study. Experimental Brain Research, 176, 217-226. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0607-3