The scale about the motivation for pre-natal communication (SMPNC): a new psychometric instrument dedicated to the assessment of the fetus
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
Psychological changes in pregnant women induce communications towards the fetus. Maternal vocal behavior induces fetal reactions. Prenatal communication takes fetuses and newborns to perform auditory discriminations. Fetuses in risk pregnancies present difficulties in these matters. To study possible changes in vocal activity during healthy and risk pregnancies, SMPNC was organized with 28 items related with maternal vocal communication. SMPNC was submitted to pregnant women waiting for sonograms at the third trimester. Adequate indexes (KMO = .888; BTS, χ2 = 2792.795, df = 378, p = .000) allowed the performance of several factorial analysis. Analysis with Equamax rotation identified five factors: Verbal Communication With the Baby, Engaging the Partner in the Communication Towards the Baby, Contents Shared in the Communication Towards the Baby, Perception About the Baby’s Auditory Competence and Availability for the Communication Towards the Baby. Together the items of these factors constitute a Total Scale. Subscales and Total Scale were correlated with sociodemographic and clinical variables. Some subscales of SMPNC present negative correlations with variables related with reproductive status. These results suggest that maternal motivation for prenatal communication is especially high during the first gestation and decreases as mothers must divide their maternal attention for several sons.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Referências
Benedek, T. (1970). The psychobiology of pregnancy, In E. Anthony & T. Benedek (Eds.), Parenthood: Its psychology and psychopathology (pp. 137-151). Boston: Little Brown and Company.
Bibring, G. (1959). Some Considerations of the Psychological Processes in Pregnancy. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 14, 113-121.
Bibring, G., Dwyer, T., Huntington, D., & Valenstein, A. (1961a). A Study of the Psychological Processes in Pregnancy and of the Earliest Mother-Child Relationship – I: Some Propositions and Comments. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 9-24.
Bibring, G., Dwyer, T., Huntington, D., & Valenstein, A. (1961b). A Study of the Psychological Processes in Pregnancy and of the Earliest Mother-Child Relationship – II: Methodological Considerations. The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 16, 25-72.
Carvalho, M. E., Justo, J., Gratier, M. & Rodrigues, M. (2019). The Impact of Maternal Voice on the Fetus: A Systematic Review. Current Women`s Health Reviews, 15(3). DOI: 10.2174/1573404814666181026094419
Colman, L. L., & Colman, A. D. (1991). Pregnancy: The Psychological Experience (revised and expanded). New York: The Noonday Press.
Cowperthwaite, B., Hains, S. M., & Kisilewsky, B. S. (2007). Fetal behavior in smoking compared to non-smoking pregnant women. Infant Behavior and Development, 30, 422-430. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2006.12.004
Del Giudice, M. (2011). Alone in the Dark? Modeling the Conditions for Visual Experience in Human Fetuses. Developmental Psychobiology, 53, 214–219. DOI: 10.1002/dev.20506
DeCasper, A. J., & Fifer, W. P. (1980). Of Human Bonding: Newborns Prefer their Mothers’ Voices. Science, New Series, 208, 4448, 1174-1176.
DeCasper, A. J., & Spence, M. J. (1986). Prenatal Maternal Speech Influences Newborns’ Perception of Peech Sounds. Infant Behavior & Development, 9, 133-150.
Deutsch, H. (1945). The Psychology of Women: A Psychoanalytic Interpretation. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Graça, C. S. S. (2018). Comunicação Pré-Natal: O Impacto da Perda Gestacional Precoce. Master Thesis in Psychology, Faculdade de Psicologia da Universidade de Lisboa.
Graffar, M. (1956). Une méthode de classification sociale d’échantillons de population. Courrier, 6(8), 455-459.
Jardri, R., Houfflin-Debarge, V., Delion, P., Pruvo, J.-P., Thomas, P., & Pins, D. (2012). Assessing fetal response to maternal speech using a noninvasive functional brain imaging technique. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 30(2), 159-161. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijdevneu. 2011.11.002
Justo, J. (2014). A defensive “stand-by reaction” at critical moments of the reproductive life cycle. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 209-214. DOI: https://revista.infad.eu/index.php/IJODAEP/article/view/604/542
Kisilevsky, B. S., Chambers, B., Parker, K., & Davies, G. (2013). Auditory Processing in Growth- Restricted Fetuses and Newborns and Later Language Development. Clinical Psychology Sciences, 2(4), 495-513. DOI: 10.1177/2167702613509371
Kisilevsky, B., Hains, S., Lee, K., Xie, X., Huang, H., Ye, H. H., Zhang, K., & Wang, Z. (2003). Effects of experience on fetal voice recognition. Psychological Science; 14(3), 220-224. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.02435
Kisilevsky, B., Hains, S., Brown, C., et al. (2009). Fetal sensitivity to properties of maternal speech and language. Infant Behavior and Development, 32(1), 59-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.infbeh.2008.10.002
Kisilevsky, B., Gilmour, A., Stutzman, S., Hains, S. M., & Brown C. (2012). Atypical fetal response to the mother’s voice in diabetic compared with overweight pregnancy. Journal of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, 33(1), 55-61. DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31823e791e.
Lee, G. Y., & Kisilevsky, B. S. (2014). Fetuses Respond to Father’s Voice but Prefer Mother’s Voice after Birth. Developmental Psychobiology, 56(1), 1-11. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21084
Lee C., Brown C, Hains S, Kisilevsky B. (2007). Fetal development: voice processing in normotensive and hypertensive pregnancies. Biological Research for Nursing, 8(4), 272-282. DOI: 10.1177/1099800406298448
Martins, M. S. A. (2018). A Voz Materna: Fatores Determinantes na Comunicação Pré-Natal. Master Thesis in Psychology, Faculdade de Psicologia da Universidade de Lisboa.
Reid, V. M., Dunn, K., Young, R. J., Amu, J., Donovan, T., & Reissland, N. (2017). The Human Fetus Preferentially Engages with Face-like Visual Stimuli. Current Biology, 27, 1825–1828. DOI: org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.05.044
Rousseau, F., Studholme, C., Jardri, R., & Thomason, M. E. (2016). In Vivo Human Fetal Brain Analysis Using MR Imaging. In: N. Reissland, & B. S. Kisilewsky, Eds. Fetal development: Research on brain and behavior, environmental influences, and emerging technologies, pp. 407-427. London: Springer.