Rapid automatized naming in early literacy

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (English)
Publicado: ago 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v3.1465

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Roberta Ceccato
Associate professor at International University of Valencia (VIU)
Mª Dolores Gil Lario
University of Valencia. General Studi
Mª Isabel Marí Sanmillán
CEU Cardenal Herrera University. Castellón

Resumo

Although the relation between Rapid Automatized Naming (RAN) and Reading is clear, there is
no a standardized test to measure the speed of naming in early literacy. The aim is to explore and confirm the factorial structure of the RAN test developed by Wolf and Denkla (2003) in children. RAN test was administred to 442 children aged 4-5 years. Results highlighted two factors: a “nonalphanumeric components” factor which includes “RAN colors” and “RAN images” and an “alphanumeric components” factor which collects “RAN letters” and “ RAN numbers”. Moreover, results highlighted a gradual shift of weight that each component of the test has in the two analyzed years and a consequent reduction in the discrimination ability of the test. In conclusion, this study not only allows to analyze the structure of the instrument “RAN”, but also describes how the speed of naming works over the early literacy.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Como Citar
Ceccato, R., Gil Lario, M. D., & Marí Sanmillán, M. I. (2019). Rapid automatized naming in early literacy. Revista INFAD De Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 3(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2019.n1.v3.1465
Edição
Vol. 3 N.º 1 (2019): Psicología de la Educación y Saberes Originarios
Secção
Artículos

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:

  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Las/os autoras/es son responsables de obtener los oportunos permisos para reproducir material (texto, imágenes o gráficos) de otras publicaciones y de citar su procedencia correctamente.
 

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.

Biografias Autor

Roberta Ceccato, Associate professor at International University of Valencia (VIU)

Profesora Departamento de Psicología y Antropología

Facultad de Educación
Universidad de Extremadura

Mª Dolores Gil Lario, University of Valencia. General Studi

Department of Evolutionary Psychology and Education University of Valencia. General Studi

Mª Isabel Marí Sanmillán, CEU Cardenal Herrera University. Castellón

Department of Education Sciences

Referências

Araújo, S., Inácio, F., Francisco, A., Faísca, L., Petersson, K. M., & Reis, A. (2011). Component processes subserving rapid automatized naming in dyslexic and non-dyslexic readers. Dyslexia, 17, 242–255. doi:10.1002/dys.433.

Araújo, S., Reis, A., Petersson, K. M., & Faísca, L. (2014, October 20). Rapid Automatized Naming and Reading Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000006.

Babayig˘it, S., & Stainthorp, R. (2010). Component processes of early reading, spelling, and narrative writing skills in Turkish: A longitudinal study. Reading and Writing, 23, 539–568. doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9173-y.

Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993). Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 5, 69–85. doi:10.1007/BF01026919.

Chiappe, P., Stringer, R., Siegel, L. S., & Stanovich, K. E. (2002). Why the timing deficit hypothesis does not explain reading disability in adults. Reading and Writing, 15, 73–107. doi:10.1023/A:1013868304361.

Clarke, P., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. (2005). Individual differences in RAN and reading: A response, timing analysis. Journal of Research in Reading, 28, 73–86. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2005.00255.x.

Cobbold, S., Passenger, T., & Terrel, C. (2003). Serial naming speed and the component elements of speech time and pause time: Relationships with the development of word-level reading in children aged four to five years. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 165–176. doi:10.1111/1467- 9817.00194

Cunningham, A. E. (2006). Accounting for children’s orthographic learning while reading text: Do children self-teach? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 56–77.

Cutting, L. E., & Denckla, M. B. (2001). The relationship of serial rapid naming and word reading in normally developing readers: An exploratory model. Reading and Writing, 14, 673–705. doi:10.1023/A:1012047622541.

Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., Kirby, J. R., & Stephenson, K. (2008). Rapid naming components and their relationship with phonological awareness, orthographic knowledge, speed of processing, and different reading outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 325–350. doi:10.1080/10888430802378518.

Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453–464. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.3.453.

Kirby, J. R., Roth, L., Desrochers, A., & Lai, S. (2008). Longitudinal predictors of word reading development. Canadian Psychology, 49,103–110. doi:10.1037/0708-5591.49.2.103.

Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150–161. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.150.

Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing: Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1–25. doi:10.1080/10888430802631684.

Norton, E. S., & Wolf, M. (2011). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) and reading fluency: Implications for understanding and treatment of reading disabilities. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 427–452.

Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G. K., & Kendeou, P. (2009). Investigating the double-deficit hypothesis in Greek. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 528–547. doi:10.1177/0022219409338745.

Pennington, B. F., Cardoso-Martins, C., Green, P. A., & Lefly, D. L. (2001). Comparing the phonological and double deficit hypotheses for developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 14, 707–755. doi:10.1023/A:1012239018038.

Roman, A. A., Kirby, J. R., Parrila, R. K., Wade-Woolley, L., & Deacon, S. H. (2009). Toward a comprehensive view of the skills involved in word reading in grades 4, 6, and 8. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 96–113. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2008.01.004.

Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia, 48, 115–136. doi:10.1007/s11881-998-0006-5.

Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256. doi:10.1177/002221940203500306.

Vaessen, A., Bertrand, D., Tóth, D., Csépe, V., Faísca, L., Reis, A., & Blomert, L. (2010). Cognitive development of fluent word reading does not qualitatively differ between transparent and opaque orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 827– 842. doi:10.1037/a0019465.

Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415–438. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.415.

Wolf, M., Bowers, P. G., & Biddle, K. (2000). Naming-speed processes, timing, and reading: A conceptual review. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33, 387–407. doi:10.1177/002221940003300409.

Wolf, M., O’Rourke, A. G., Gidney, C., Lovett, M., Cirino, P., & Morris, R. (2002). The second deficit: An investigation of the independence of phonological and naming speed deficits in developmental dyslexia. Reading and Writing, 15, 43–72. doi:10.1023/A:1013816320290