Trust, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy. A Research with Sicilian Entrepreneurs

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

PDF (English)
Publicado: jul 2, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n1.v2.242

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Stefania Galletta
University of Catania
Orazio Licciardello
Università di Catania
Alberto Rampullo
University of Catania
Manuela Mauceri
University of Catania
Daniela Damigella
University of Messina

Resumo

Investigating the relationship between self-concept and potential territory was the aim of our research.  Particularly, we have provided if the self-concept, self-efficacy and metacognitive ability of Sicilian entrepreneurs correlate with trust in Sicily Region institution. Moreover, if there was a positive correlation between high levels in these constructs and trust in another Sicilian firms.  In the end, we provided if entrepreneurs, which have high levels in self-concept, self-efficacy and metacognitive ability, were good at seeing and understanding Sicily. Seeing the Sicily as potential territory to protective and to get reality. 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Como Citar
Galletta, S., Licciardello, O., Rampullo, A., Mauceri, M., & Damigella, D. (2016). Trust, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy. A Research with Sicilian Entrepreneurs. Revista INFAD De Psicología. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology., 2(1), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n1.v2.242
Edição
Vol. 2 N.º 1 (2016): PSICOLOGÍA, CIENCIA Y PROFESIÓN: MIRANDO AL FUTURO.
Secção
Artículos

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:

  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Las/os autoras/es son responsables de obtener los oportunos permisos para reproducir material (texto, imágenes o gráficos) de otras publicaciones y de citar su procedencia correctamente.
 

Licencia de Creative Commons
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.

Biografias Autor

Stefania Galletta, University of Catania

Degree in Psychology

Orazio Licciardello, Università di Catania

Full Professor Of Social Psychology

Department of Edicationa Sciences

University of Catania

Alberto Rampullo, University of Catania

Graduate Student

Manuela Mauceri, University of Catania

Phd in Psychology

Daniela Damigella, University of Messina

Assistant Professor in Social Psychology

Referências

Barbosa, S., Gerardt, M., Kickul, J. (2007). The role of cognitive style and risk preference on entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13, 86-104.

Bloch, P.H. (1995). Seeking the ideal form: Product design and consumer response. The Journal of Marketing, 16-29.

Bouty, I. (2000). Interpersonal and interaction influences in informal resource exchanges between R&D researchers across organizationa boundaries. Academy of Mnagement Journal, 43 (1), 50-65.

Brodt, S., Korsgaard, M.A. (2003). Group indentity and attachment: Two paths to trust and cooperation in groups. In 16th Annual IACM Conference Melbourne, Australia.

Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition and other mechanisms.In F.E. Weinert & R.H. Kuwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and undestranding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Burt, R. (1992). Structural holes. The social structure of completion. Cambridge:Harvard.

Chen, C.C., Greene, P.G., Crick, A. (1988). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295-316.

De Noble, A., Jung, D., Ehrlich, S. (1999). Entrepreneurial self-efficay: The developmenta of a measure and its relationship to entrepreneurial action. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship research. Boston: Babson College.

Di Nuovo, S., Giovannini, D., Loiero, S. (1999). Risolvere i problemi. Strategie cognitive

Fichman, M. (2003). Strainig towards trust: Some constraints essay on studying trust in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(2), 133-157.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American psychologist, 34, 906-911.

Griffin, D., Ross, L. (1991). Subjective construal, social inference, and human misunderstanding. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol.24, pp.319-356). New York: Academic Press.

Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of management journal, 38 (1), 85-112.

Jarratt, D., ceric, A. (2015). The complexity of trust in business collaborations. Australians marketing Journal, 23(1), 2-12.

Habbershon, T.G., Nordqvist, M., Zellweger, T. (2010). Transgenerational entrepreneurship. Transegenrational entrepreneurship: exploring growth and performance in family firms across generations, 1-38.

Haynie, M., Shepherd, D.A. (2009). A measure of adaptive cognition for entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 695-713.

Hitt, M.A., Keats, B.W., De Marie, S.M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive, 12, 22-42.

Krueger, N.F., Reilly, M.D., Carsrud, A.L. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of business Venturing, 15, 411-432.

James, W. (1890). The consciousness of self. The principles of psychology,8.

Larson, A. (1992). Network dyads in entrepreneurial setting: A study of the governance of exchange relationship. Administrative science quarterly, 76-104.

Lewicki, R.J., McAllister, D.J., Bies, R.J. (1998). Trust and distrust: New relationships and realities. Academy of management review, 2383),438-458.

Licciardello, O., Castiglione, C. (2008). Self, formazione e “territorio potenziale” nella società del cambiamento: dati di ricerca con giovani disoccupati, sindaci ed imprenditori. Acireale-Roma: Bonanno Editore

Locke, E., Frederick, E., Lee, C., Bobko, P. (1984). Effect of self-efficacy, goals, and task strategies on task performance. Journal of Apllied psychology, 69, 241-251.

Locke, E., Latham, G. 1990). Work motivation and satisfaction: Light at the end of the tunnel. Psychological Science,1, 240-247.

Low, M.B., MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of management, 14 (2), 139-161.

McAllister, D.J. (1995). Affected-and cognition based trust as founfations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academic of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

Markman, A.D., Baron, R.A. (2003). Person-entrepreneurship fit: why some people are more successful entrepreneurs than others. Human Resource Management Review, 13 (2), 281-301.

Mellinger, G.D. (1956). Interpersonal trust as a factor in communication. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52 (3), 304.

Nelson, T. (1996). Consciousness and metacognition. American Psychologist, 51, 102-129.

N’Goala, G. (2010). Discovering the dark side of service relationship..or why long-lasting and exclusive relationship are self-destructing. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition),25, 3-30.

O’Connor, E.O., Hill, C. A. (2006). A cognitive theory of trust.

Paliszkiewicz, J.O., (2011). Trust Management: Literature Review. Management,6 (4).

Phillips, J.M., Gully, S.M. (1997). Role of goal orientation, ability, need for achievement, and locus of control in the self-efficacy and goal-setting process. Journal of Applied psychology, 82(5), 792-802.

Raimy, V.C. (1984). Self reference in counselling interviews. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 12(3),153.

Roberts, K.H., O’Reilly, C.A. (1979). Some correlations of communication roles in organizations. Academy of management journal, 22(1), 42-57.

Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. New York:Basic Books.

Rosenberg, M. (1989). Self-concept research. A historical overview. Social forces, 68 (1), 34-44.

Schacter, D.L., Dennison, R. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 460-475.

Shapiro, S.P., (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American journal of sociology, 623-658.

Simons, T.L., Peterson, R.S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of applied psychology, 85 (1), 102.

Sztompka, P. (1999). Trust: A sociological theory. Cambridge University Press.

Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of management journal, 41(4), 464-476.