Evaluation of quality indicators of the satisfaction of the degrees of education of the school of education and humanities of Melilla through the content analysis

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Nov 4, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v3.1007
Keywords:
content analysis university higher education ANECA evaluation

Main Article Content

María del Carmen Olmos Gómez
University of Granada
María Tomé Fernández
University of Granada

Abstract

This work focuses on the evaluation of quality through the satisfaction of training of the education students of Melilla, the method to be used will be the content analysis by procedures systematic and objective description of the content of the messages, allowing the inference of knowledge related to production / reception conditions (social context) of these messages (Bardin, 1996: 32, Berrocal and Megías, 2015, Buendía, 2010), of instruments and existing, and with which the evaluations of the degrees are currently carried out, in the University of Granada, carrying out an exhaustive analysis of the system of indicators proposed by ANECA (National Agency for the Evaluation of Quality and Accreditation) and the Vice-Rector's Office for the Guarantee of Quality of the University of Granada, and, on the other hand, establishing comparisons of the criteria of analysis of quality indicators in several national and international universities. After the analysis we can conclude that, in general, the indicators to be evaluated are not based on evidence of user satisfaction, based on the documents on the evaluation of university teaching quality, and, depending on the content analysis, we can propose a series of indicators that allow to evaluate the quality of the Training of the Degrees of Education externally, trying to improve the criteria of effectiveness and efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Olmos Gómez, M. del C., & Tomé Fernández, M. (2017). Evaluation of quality indicators of the satisfaction of the degrees of education of the school of education and humanities of Melilla through the content analysis. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 3(1), 397–400. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2017.n1.v3.1007
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2017): MONOGRAPH NO. 2. PSYCHOLOGY TODAY: CHALLENGES, ACHIEVEMENTS AND PERSPECTIVES OF THE FUTURE. CHILD PSYCHOLOGY.
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Barrenetxea, M., Cardona, A. y Echebarría, C. (2006) Una revisión crítica de los modelos de la calidad en la educación superior. VI Congreso Internacional Virtual de Educación. Palma de Mallorca, 6-26 febrero (CD-ROM).

Bardin, L. (1996) (2ªed). Análisis de contenido. Madrid: Akal.

Berrocal, E. y Megías, S. (2015). Indicadores de Calidad para la Evaluación de Plataformas Virtuales. Revista Internacional de Aprendizaje y Cibersociedad, 152 – 172.

Buendía, L. (2010). Metodologías de investigación para el desarrollo del conocimiento en un contexto multicultural. En Boza, A. Méndez,J.M., Monescillo, M. y Toscano, M.O.: Educación, investigación, y desarrollo social. Madrid. Narcea. pp: 15-31

Evans, C. (2013). Making sense of assessment feedback in higher education. Review of educational research, 83(1), 70-120.

Mateo, J. (2000). La evaluación educativa, su práctica y otras metáforas. Barcelona: ICE- Horsori.

Muñoz, J.,& Espiñeira, E (2010). Plan de mejoras fruto de la evaluación de la calidad de la atención a la diversidad en un centro educativo. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 28, 245-264.

Sangüesa, M., Mateo, R. e Ilzarbe, L. (2006). Teoría y práctica de la calidad. Madrid: Thomson.

Stubrin, A. (2010). Calidad universitaria. Evaluación y acreditación en la educación superior latinoamericana. Santa Fe: Eudeba, Ediciones UNL.

Sverdlick, I. (2012). ¿Qué hay de nuevo en evaluación educativa? Buenos Aires: Centro de Publicaciones Educativas y Material Didáctico.

Traba, L., Barletta, M. y Velázquez, J. (2010). Teoría y práctica de las organizaciones: herramienta para la gestión de la calidad. Santa Fe: Universidad Nacional del Litoral.