Model of family instability in the rupture of couple

Main Article Content

Antonio Rodríguez Quintana
Heriberto Javier Rodríguez-Mateo
Isabel Luján Henríquez

Abstract

It is known that the breakup of couples is related to family instability. From this general assumption, the work presented has several objectives: first, to check the different degrees of association or correlation between family variables such as family stress, family communication, family resources in relation to satisfaction and marital instability. Second, design a structural model through the confirmation of the relationships between the variables.

Olson's MASH model has been taken as a starting point, which in the context of crisis theory states that family stress affects family satisfaction with mediating variables such as family functioning, family resources and family communication, and the cascade model of Gottman that predicts, after laboratory studies, that family instability is reached, and, therefore, divorce, in a cascade process from one stage to another by different variables. The unification of both models would give a different view to current studies on the relationship between marital satisfaction and marital instability. The results establish the theoretical relationships proposed through a confirmatory structural model.

We consider that it is of great interest for the mediation professionals, in order to improve their performance and intervention in mediation processes and thus achieve greater effectiveness in their objectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Rodríguez Quintana, A., Rodríguez-Mateo, H. J., & Luján Henríquez, I. (2015). Model of family instability in the rupture of couple. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 2(1), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n1.v2.111
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Antonio Rodríguez Quintana

Psicólogo. Máster en Intervención y Mediación Familiar.

Heriberto Javier Rodríguez-Mateo, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Departamento de Psicología y Sociología.

Profesor contratado doctor.

Miembro del grupo de investigación "Intervención para el desarrollo psicológico" de la ULPGC

 

Isabel Luján Henríquez, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Departamento de Psicología y Sociología.

Catedrática E.U. de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación.

Directora del grupo de investigación "Intervención para el desarrollo psicológico" de la ULPGC

References

Adams, J.M. y Jones, W.H. (1999). The conceptualization of marital commitment: An integrative analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1177-1196.

Barnes, H.L. y Olson, D.H. (1982). Parent adolescent communication Scales. In McCubbin, Hamilton I., et al. Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the family life cycle. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota.

Booth, A. y Edwards, J. (1983). Measuring marital instability. 5. Journal of Marriage

and the Family, 45, 387-393.

Bush, R. A. B. y Folger J. P. (1996). La promesa de la mediación. Cómo afrontar el conflicto a través del fortalecimiento y el reconocimiento de los otros. Barcelona: Gránica.

Bush, R. A. B. y Folger J. P. (1996). La promesa de la mediación. Cómo afrontar el conflicto a través del fortalecimiento y el reconocimiento de los otros. Barcelona: Gránica.

Domínguez, E. (2012). Estudios sobre satisfacción marital y variables asociadas en parejas españolas. TFM. Universidad de Salamanca.

Fincham, F., & Beach, S. (1999). Conflict in Marriage: Implications for working with couples. Annual Review Psychologyst, 47-77.

Gottman, J. M. (1979). Marital Interaction. Experimental investigations. Academic Press.

Gottman, J. M. (1998). Psychology and the study of marital processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 169-97.

Gottman, J. M. (2001). What the study of relationships has to say about emotion research. Social Science Information, 40, 79-94.

Gottman, J. M. y Levenson, R.W. (1986). Assessing the role of emotion in marriage. Behavioral Assessment, 8, 31-48.

Herrero, J. (2010). El análisis factorial confirmatorio en el estudio de la estructura y estabilidad de los instrumentos de evaluación: un ejemplo con el cuestionario de autoestima CA-14. Intervención psicosocial, 19(3), 289-300.

Iraurgi, I, Sanz, M. Y Martínez-Pampliega, A. (2009). Adaptación y estudio psicométrico de dos Instrumentos de pareja: índice de satisfacción Matrimonial y escala de inestabilidad matrimonial. Revista de investigación en psicología. Bilbao: UNMSM, vol 12, nº 2, pp 177-192

Martínez, P. (1995). Factores de riesgo del conflicto marital. Suma Psicológica, 2(1), 69-103.

Olson, D. H. (1997). Family stress and coping: A multisystem perspective. In S. Dreman (Ed.), The family on the threshold of the 21st century (pp. 259-280). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Olson, D. H., Stewart, K. L., y Wilson, L. R. (1990). Health and stress profile (HSP), revised. Minneapolis: Profile of Health Systems

Rollins, B. C. y Feldman, H. (1970). Marital satisfaction over the family life cycle. J. Marriage Fam. 32:20-8.

Sanz, M. (2002). El funcionamiento familiar de los toxicómanos a lo largo de un tratamiento. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Deusto.

Sanz, M., Iraurgi, I. y Martínez-Pampliega, A. (2002). Evaluación del funcionamiento familiar en toxicomanías: Adaptación española y características de adecuación métrica del FAP-FACES IV. En I. Iraurgi y F. González-Saiz (Eds.), Instrumentos de evaluación en drogo-dependencias (pp. 403-434). Madrid: Aula Médica.

Sternberg, R.J. (1997). Construct validation of a triangular love scale. European Journal of Social Psychology, 27, 313-335.