Profile of the mediator. interactive model mediation integrator (miim)

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Jun 25, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n1.v2.112
Keywords:
model mediation interaction integration

Main Article Content

Isabel Luján Henríquez
Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to analyze the profile of the mediator in the Interactive Interactive Model of Mediation (MIIM, Luján 2015) from a theoretical and empirical foundation.

Mediation is the channel where the objective, subjective and contextual elements that make up the conflict on the part of the people immersed in it manifest themselves and converge. The mediator is the channel of transmission that allows such convergence and helps the modeling-and modulation-of the controversy through the establishment of a facilitating dynamic that enables the positive integration of the dispute.

For the optimal achievement of both functions, it is necessary to change the perspective, to withdraw to broaden and deepen, to include without reservation the interaction of all the referred elements and to take them as a unit, a whole, an integrum.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Luján Henríquez, I. (2015). Profile of the mediator. interactive model mediation integrator (miim). International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 2(1), 491–500. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2015.n1.v2.112
Issue
Vol. 2 No. 1 (2015): A NEW VISION OF PSYCHOLOGY: THE ADULT WORLD.
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Alzate, R. (1998). Análisis y resolución de conflictos: Una perspectiva psicológica.Bilbao: Servicio editorial. Universidad del País Vasco.

Brito, N. y Luján, I. (2010). La meditación: recurso que favorece el desarrollo de conductas neutrales en el mediador. Proyecto Fin de Máster. ULPGC. Biblioteca.

Díaz Calcines, M. y Luján, I. (2013) Resiliencia y Mediación Familiar desde la perspectiva de mediadores profesionales. Proyecto Fin de Máster: Intervención y Mediación Familiar. ULPGC: Biblioteca.

Epstein, S. (2012). CTI. Inventario de Pensamiento constructivo. Una medida de la inteligencia emocional. Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Hernández-Guanir, P. (2010). Moldes. Test de estrategias cognitivo-emocionales.Madrid: TEA Ediciones.

Kolb, D. (1989). Labor mediators, managers, and ombudsmen: Roles mediators play in different contexts. En K. Kressel, y D. G. Pruitt, (eds.): Mediation Research: The Process and Effectiveness of Thirdparty Intervention. San Francisco: JosseyBass, pp.91-114.

Luján, I. (2015). Mediación y Resolución de Conflictos. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria. Servicio de Publicaciones y Difusión Científica de la ULPGC.

Rodríguez Trueba, C., Rodríguez-Mateo, H. y Luján, I. (2014).Validez predictiva del pensamiento constructivo en la eficacia negociadora.International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Infad. Revista de Psicología. 245-258.

Rodríguez Trueba, C., Rodríguez-Mateo, H., López, P. y Luján, I. (en prensa). Validez predictiva de variables socioemocionales en la eficacia negociadora.

Santana, G. y Rodríguez Mateo, H. (2014).El perfil de eficacia del mediador desde la perspectiva de la negociación.International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Infad. Revista de Psicología. 237-244.

Serrano, G. (2008). Eficacia y Mediación Familiar. Boletín Oficial de Psicología, 92,51-63.

Serrano, G., Lopes, C, Rodríguez, D. y Mirón, L. (2006). Características de los mediadores y éxito de la mediación. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica. Santiago de Compostela.16, 75-88.

Serrano, Rodríguez y Cunha (1999).Evaluación de la Eficacia Negociadora: El Cen II.