Bibliometric analysis of subjective well being
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The objective of this retrospective ex post facto study is to describe the subjective well-being by means of a bibliometric analysis of the 1998-2018 time period using the Scopus database. During this period, 2450 articles have been published in this database.
Not only have been productivity and temporal range analyzed, but also scientific production rates by countries, languages, authors, journals, universities and supporting organisms, identifying the highest productivity rates.
The main results found refer to an increase in global scientific production on subjective well-being mainly between 2013 and 2018, there is also a predominance of publications in English language, where the most pro ducing countries are the United States, Germany and the United Kingdom and the main references in scientific production are Diener, Ferran and Oichi. These results, in turn, will be able to be in use as base for successive research projects that contribute to the progress of the science.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Alfaro, J., Casas, F. & López, V. (2015). Bienestar en la infancia y adolescencia. Psicoperspectivas: Individuo y Sociedad, 14(1), 1-5.
Andrés, A. (2009). Measuring academic research. How to undertake a bibliometric study. Cambridge: Chandos
Publishing.
Cuadra, H. & Florenzano, R. (2003). El bienestar subjetivo: hacia una psicología positiva. Revista de Psicología de la Universidad de Chile, 12(1), 83-96.
Cummins, R.A., Eckersley, R., Van Pallant, J., Vugt, J. y Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective well-being: The Australian unity well-being index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159-190.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.
Diener, E. (1994). El bienestar subjetivo. Intervención psicosocial, 3, 67-113.
Diener, E. (2000). Subjective well–being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. American
Psychologist. 55; 34 – 43.
Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well-being and ill-being. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 1, 151-157.
Diener, E. & Larsen, R.J. (2009). Temporal stability and cross-situational consistency of affective, behavioral, and cognitive responses. En E. Diener (Ed.) Assessing well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 7-24). Nueva York: Springer (Social Indicators Research Series, 39).
Diener, E., Scollon, C.N. & Lucas, R.E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. En E. Diener (Ed.) Assessing well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 67-100). Nueva York: Springer (Social Indicators Research Series, 39).
Diener, E., Suh, E., Lucas, R. & Smith, H. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 276-302.
Farías, F., Orellana, C. & Pérez, C. (2015). Perfil de las Publicaciones sobre Bienestar Subjetivo en Chile. Cinta
de moebio, 54, 240-249.
Lucas, R.E., Diener, E. & Suh, E. (1996). Discriminant validity of wellbeing measures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 616-628.
Montero, I. & León, O. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847-862.
Muñoz Umaña, C. (2007). Perspectiva psicológica del bienestar subjetivo. Psicogente, 10(18), 163-173.
Pavot, W. & Diener, E. (2009). Review of the satisfaction with life scale. En E. Diener (Eds.) Assessing well-being. The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 101-117). Nueva York: Springer (Social Indicators Research Series,39).
Peñaguirre Cano, M. & Rodríguez Mendoza, T. (2017). Un camino hacia el bienestar subjetivo. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 2(1), 301-305.
Pérez, G., Anta, C., Badera, S., García, J., Pérez, M. & Sarrate, M. (2003). Análisis Bibliométrico en Educación. Incidencia en la calidad universitaria. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia de España.
Programa de las Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo. (2012). Bienestar subjetivo: el desafío de repensar el desarrollo. Santiago: Autor.
Rodríguez-Fernández, A. & Goni-Grandmontagne, A. (2011). La estructura tridimensional del bienestar subjetivo. Anales de Psicología, 27(2), 327-332.
Rojas, M. (2011). Más allá del ingreso: progreso y bienestar subjetivo. En: M. Rojas (Coord.), La medición del progreso y del bienestar. Propuestas desde América Latina (pp. 29-39). Foro Consultivo Científico y Tecnológico, AC México.
Rueda-Clausen, C., Villaroel-Gutiérrez, C. & Rueda-Clausen, C. (2005). Indicadores bibliométricos. Origen, aplicación contradicción y nuevas propuestas. Med UNAB, 8(1), 29-36.
Seligman, M. & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, 55,5-14.
Seligson, J., Huebner, E. & Valois, R. (2005). An investigation of a Brief Life Satisfaction Scale with Elementary School children. Social Indicators Research, 73(3), 355–374.
Vázquez, C., Duque, A. & Hervas, G. (2013). Satisfaction with life scale in a representative sample of Spanish adults: Validation and normative data. Spanish Journal of Psychology. 16(82), 1–15.