Quality of life assessment in the portuguese population
Main Article Content
Abstract
In the last decades, the evaluation of the quality of life of populations has been constant, both in general terms and in specific populations, often used to assess the impact of health interventions. Its concept can be different due to the context or the different perception of the subjects. The World Health Organization understands it as the perception that an individual has about his position in life, in his context, meeting his goals, expectations, standards and concerns. Health and quality of life are two concepts with an indisputable relationship, since “health contributes to improving the quality of life of individuals and this is an essential determinant for individuals or the community to have health. Thus, we intend to evaluate the quality of life in individuals aged 18 years or over. To this end, we opted to carry out a descriptive cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach. A methodology called snowball or snowball sampling was used, being a non-probabilistic sampling technique. A questionnaire consisting of characterization questions and the SF-36v2 (The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey) was used. This is a generic health questionnaire, with 36 items that assess the physical, emotional and social dimension, as well as physical and emotional performance, pain and general health and vitality. Data collection was carried out in 2020. The ethical precepts applied to this type of studies were considered, taking into account the Declaration of Helsinki and the Oviedo Convention. The sample consists of 135 individuals, mostly female (68.15%), aged between 18 and 63 years. They are mostly single (60.74%), licensed (50.37%), residing in urban areas (70.37%). Regarding the state of health, they perceive it to be good and excellent (48.88%), compared to a year ago 45.93% perceive it to be similar. In physical terms, 37.5% of those questioned and sometimes 27.94% feel vitality. In psychological and emotional terms 43.38% feel calm and calm most of the time and 23.53 feel some time. More than 50% do not feel any limitation in activities, whether physical, psychological, or emotional. They feel as healthy or more like the other 62.24%. These results allow us to conclude that in general the participants have good levels of related quality of life. Similar results were found about physical and emotional health. The sample size can be considered as a limit for this investigation. These assessments allow the identification of health determinants and facilitate decision making.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Barofsky, I. (21 de Abril de 2012). Can quality or quality-of-life be defined? Quality of life research, pp. 625-631.
Farquhar, M. (1995). Definitions of quality of life: a taxonomy. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 502-508.
Ferrans, C. E. (2005). Definitions and conceptual models of quality of life. . Cambridge: cambridge university
Ferreira, P. (2000). Criação da Versão Portuguesa do MOS SF-36, Parte I – Adaptação Cultural e Linguística. Revista Acta Médica Portuguesa, 55-66.60
Fleck, M., Leal, O., Louzada, S., Xavier, M., Chachamovich, E., Vieira, G., Santos, L., Pinzon, V. (1999). Desenvolvimento da versão em português do instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da OMS (WHO QOL-100). Rer Bras Psiquiatr, 21 (1)
Fleck, M. P. (2000). O instrumento de avaliação de qualidade de vida da Organização Mundial de Saúde (WHO QOL-100) . Ciência e Saúde Colectiva, pp. 33-38.
Fleck, M. P. (2000). Aplicação da versão em português do instrumento abreviado deavaliação da qualidade de vida “WHOQOL-bref”. Revista de Saúde Pública, 178-183.
Guyatt, G. F. (1993). Measuring health-related quality of life. Annals of Internal Medicine. pp. 622–629.
Melo, P. (2020). Enfermagem de Saúde Comunitária e de Saúde Pública (1ª ed.). Lisboa: Lidel.
Minayo, M.C.S.; Hartz, Z.M.A.; Buss, P.M. Qualidade de vida e saúde: um debate necessário. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, Rio de Janeiro, v.5, n.1, p.7-18, 2000
Monahan, S. N. (2009). Phips Enfermagem Médico-Cirúrgica. Lusodidacta.61
Nunes, R. &. Rego (2002). Prioridades na Saúde (2ª ed.). Lisboa: Editora McGraw-hill.
OE. (2011). Padrões de Qualidade dos Cuidados de Enfermagem: Enquadramento conceptual; Enunciados descritivos. 1-11. Lisboa: Ordem dos Enfermeiros.
Pereira, Teixeira & Santos (2012). Qualidade de vida: abordagens, conceitos e avaliação. Rev. bras. Educ. Fís. Esporte, São Paulo, v.26, n.2, p.241-50
Ribeiro, J. L. (1994). Análise Psicológica. A importância da qualidade de vida para a Psicologia da Saúde, pp. 79-191.
Ribeiro, J. L. (2005). Introdução à Psicologia da Saúde. Coimbra: Editora Quarteto. Ribeiro, J. L. (2009). A importância da qualidade de vida para a Psicologia da Saúde. Alcochete: Textiverso.
Sampaio, A, C, L. (2007). Benefícios da caminhada na qualidade de vida dos adultos. Dissertação de licenciatura apresentada na Faculdade de Desporto da Universidade do Porto.
Seidl, E. M. (2004). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. Cadernos de Saúde Púbica, 580– 588.
Sieber, W. J. (2008). Quality of well being – Self-Administered (QWB-SA) Scale, User s Manual. San Diego: University of California.
Silva, I. P.-R. (21 de 2 de 2003). Qualidade de vida e complicações crónicas da diabetes. Análise Psicológica,, pp. 185-194.
Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality of life outcomes. New Eng J Med 1996;334:835-40
Turato, E. (2003). Tratado da metodologia da pesquisa clínico-qualitativa: construção teórico-epistemológica, discussão comparada e aplicação nas áreas da saúde e humanas. Petrópolis: Vozes