Maths for life. Following the steps of Pisa in primary school
Main Article Content
Abstract
The assessments on mathematical competence, carried out in the Canary Islands, show the need to rethink how to work maths at school. It is suggested to generate a real change, effective and generalized in the teaching and learning of mathematics through teacher training in teacher centers, to translate what they have learned in new models of active learning with students. At the same time, trained teachers are encouraged to become trainers of other teachers, creating a network of exchange and innovation among teachers. At the end of the experience very positive teacher ratings were received on the interest of the training itself and the degree of transfer to their daily teaching. The main strengths emphasized by the teachers are the applicability of the processes and the methodological change brought to their classrooms. There were also statistically significant improvements in the processes involved in the resolution of problems in the group of students whose teachers participated in the formative action (experimental group), in contrast to a group of students who did not receive this training (control group). There were also significant differences in favour of the experimental group in the academic performance in the area of math. The results confirm that this model of formative action in which something is taught, learned and shared, promotes the meaningful learning, strengthen the key competences involved in solving problems and improve the grades in mathematics. This methodological change favours, on the one hand, the construction of the knowledge on the part of the students, making them authors of their own learning, and on the other, it strengthens the collaborative work among teachers, enriching their educational experiences and improving the educational atmosphere.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Berbey-Meyer, Y. & Kaplan, A. (2005): “Motivational influences on transfer of problem-solving strategies”. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30, 1-22.
Consejo Escolar de Canarias (2011): Informe 2011. La Realidad Educativa de Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Consejo Escolar de Canarias.
Fuchs, L. S. (2006): “Strategies to enhance young children’s mathematical development”. Tremblay RE, Barr RG, Peters RDeV, eds. Encyclopedia on Early Childhood Development [online]. Montreal, Quebec: Centre of Excellence for Early Childhood Development. Recuperado de http://www.child encyclopedia.com/documents/FuchsANGxp.pdf. Accessed (2009).
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Ham, C. L., Owen, R., & Schroeter, K. (2003): “Enhancing third-grade students mathematical problem solving with self-regulated learning strategies”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 306-315.
Hegarty, M., Mayer, R.E., & Monk, C.A. (1995): “Comprehension of arithmetic word problems: a comparison of successful and unsuccessful problem solvers”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87 (1), 18–32.
Montague, M. (2007): “Self-Regulation and Mathematics Instruction”. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 75–83.
Moreno, I. & Ortiz, J. (2008): “Docentes de educación básica y sus concepciones acerca de la evaluación en matemática”. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 1 (1), 140-164.
Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975): “Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6, 41–51.
PISA 2003, Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
PISA 2009, Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos. OCDE. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/.
Polya, G. (1987): Cómo plantear y resolver problemas. México: Trillas.
Rosales, J., Vicente, C., Chamoso, J. M., Muñez, D., & Orrantia J. (2012): “Teacher–student interaction in joint word problem solving. The role of situational and mathematical knowledge in mainstream classrooms”. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 1185-1195.
Salmerón, H., Gutiérrez-Braojos, C., & Salmerón, P. (2009): “Desarrollo de la competencia matemática a través de programas para Aprender a Aprender en la Infancia Temprana”. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 2 (2), 141-168.
Rupérez, J.A., & García-Déniz, M. (2006): “Club Matemático. Problemas Comentados (XVI)”. NÚMEROS. Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas, 65, 1-7.
Rupérez, J.A., & García-Déniz, M. (2012a): “De nietos y aves: (Problemas Comentados XXXI)”. NÚMEROS. Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas,80, 185-196.
Rupérez, J.A., & García-Déniz, M. (2012b): “Educación Primaria: problemas, estrategias y competencias: (problemas comentados XXXII)”. NÚMEROS. Revista de Didáctica de las Matemáticas, 81, 77-90.
Verschaffel, L., De Corte, E., & Pauwels, A. (1992): “Solving compare problems: an eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer’s consistency hypothesis”. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 85–94.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2000): Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.