Vocational development and factors that influenced vocational choice in people disabled with laborally inserted university studies

Article Sidebar

PDF (Español (España))
Published: Sep 27, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v3.534
Keywords:
Vocational development and advancement factors of choice disability gender

Main Article Content

José Manuel Martínez Vicente
Universidad de Almería
María Ángeles Segura García
Universidad de Almería
Isabel García Martínez
Universidad de Almería

Abstract

The characteristics and factors of vocational behaviour which have an impact on non-disabled university students are relatively well-known (Rocabert and Martínez-Vicente, 2011). However, the vocational development and advancement of disabled university students is less well-known. The aim of this paper was to study the vocational advancement and the factors of choice of disabled university graduates in employment taking into account gender differences. For this purpose the Cuestionario de Biodatos Universitarios (CBU) by Rocabert and Martínez-Vicente (2011) and the Inventario de Factores Vocacionales by Rivas and Pascual (2003) were given to a sample of 30 disabled university graduates (average age, 32.8 years; standard deviation, 9.2 years). The results showed that psychogenic factors heavily conditioned the vocational behaviour of both sexes. They also showed that the impact of sociogenic factors linked to external and stereotyped influences is more significant in women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Martínez Vicente, J. M., Segura García, M. Ángeles, & García Martínez, I. (2014). Vocational development and factors that influenced vocational choice in people disabled with laborally inserted university studies. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 3(1), 539–548. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v3.534
Issue
Vol. 3 No. 1 (2014): EDUCATIONAL DIFFICULTIES
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Bernardo, J., y Caldero, J.F. (2000). Investigación cuantitativa (4); Métodos no experimentales. Madrid: Rialp, S. A.

Cabrera, L. y Bethencourt, J. T. (2008). Desarrollo vocacional y estrategias de aprendizaje en estudiantado universitario. Revista de Orientación Educacional, 22(40), 13-29. 2008.

Castaño, C. (1983): Psicología y orientación vocacional. Madrid: Marova.

Dalmau, M., Llinares, M., Sala, I., y Giné, C. (2010). Integración laboral de los universitarios españoles con discapacidad. Fundación Universia. Barcelona.

Dosil, A. y Fernandez Eire, L.F. (2001). O Self- Directed Search (SDS) en Galicia. Revista Gallega do Encino,33, 137-153.

Farmer, H. (1985). Model of career and achievement motivation for women and men. Journal of Counseling Psycology, 32, 363-390.

Gimeno, M.J. (2003). Análisis de la problemática vocacional y de los biodatos ante la toma de decisión. Tesis doctoral. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad de Valencia.

Gomez-Artiaga, T., Lloret, S., Rocabert, E., y Descals, A. (2013). Desarrollo y validación del Cuestionario de Personalidad Vocacional Adaptativa: un cuestionario para analizar la conducta vocacional de estudiantes universitarios. Anales de psicología, 2 (29), 470-481.

Malgwi, C. A., Howe, M. A. y Burnaby, P. A. (2005). Influences on students choice of college major. Journal of Education for Business, 80, 275–282.

Martín, T. (2006).Orientación vocacional. Luventicus (Academia de ciencias) Rosario. Argentina.

Mora, R. (2008). Conducta y asesoramiento vocacional/preprofesional de los estudiantes universitarios: Variables individuales del desarrollo de la carrera y servicios institucionales. Tesis doctoral. Universidad de Valencia.

Mosteiro, M.J y Porto, A.(2000). Los motivos de elección de estudios en alumnos y alumnas de universidad. Revista Innovación educativa, 10, 121-132.

Olaz, F. (2003). Autoeficacia y Diferencias de Género. Aportes a la explicación del Comportamiento Vocacional. Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada, 56 (3), 353-370.

O’neil, J. et al. (1978). Factor correlates andproblem areas affecting career decisión making of crosssectional sample of students. Journal of Counseling Psycology, 6, 571-580.

Rivas, F. (1997). El proceso de enseñanza/aprendizaje en la situación educativa. Barcelona: Ariel.

Rivas, F. (2003). Asesoramiento vocacional. Teoría, práctica e instrumentación. Barcelona:Ariel Psicología.

Rivas, F. y Pascual, F. (2003). Inventario de factores vocacionales, Apendice 1. En F. Rivas, Asesoramiento vocacional. Teoría, práctica e instrumentación. Barcelona: Ariel.

Rocabert, E. (1995). Indicadores de la conducta vocacional y los intereses vocacionales. En Rivas, F. (Ed.) (1995). Manual de Asesoramiento y Orientación vocacional (pp. 167-204). Madrid: Síntesis.

Rocabert, E y Martínez-Vicente, J.M (2011). Conducta vocacional y preprofesional de los estudiantes universitarios. Almería: Education & Psychology I+D+i.

Rodríguez,P.,Suso,A.,Vazquez,D., y Velasco,M.L (2013).Discapacidad, Estudios superiores y mercado de trabajo. Barreras de acceso y repercusión en la inserción laboral. Programa Operativo de Lucha contra la Discriminación 2007-2013, cofinanciado por el Fondo Social Europeo.

SEPE (2013). Informe del mercado de trabajo de las personas con discapacidad estatal. Madrid.

Valls, M., Vilà, M. y Pallisera, M. (2004). La inserción de las personas con discapacidad en el trabajo ordinario. El papel de la familia. Revista de Educación, 334, 66.

Wagner, M., Newman, L., Cameto, R. y Levine i Marder, C. (2007). Perceptions and expectations of youth with disabilities. A special topic report of findings from the national longitudinal transition study-2 (NLTS2). No. (NCSER 2007-3006).U.S. Department of Education.