Journey through “fields” of ageing - from “world of elders” to “worlds of seniors”

Article Sidebar

DESARROLLO PSICO-SOCIOEMOCIONAL DE LA EDAD: PSICOLOGÍA POSITIVA Y BIENESTAR EN LAS PERSONAS MAYORES
PDF (Italiano)
Published: Oct 28, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n2.v1.665
Keywords:
active ageing quality of life social representations contact empathy

Main Article Content

Orazio Licciardello
Manuel Mauceri
Graziella Di Marco
Maria Giuseppina Cardella

Abstract

We conducted some researches in order to explore “fields” or dimensions of elderly people’s Quality of Life (QoL), both as self-perception and hetero-perception. A set of researches were conducted in Italy and Spain, involving seniors and university students. The aim was to explore the seniors’ QoL from both their and the students’ point of view. Results showed elderly people perceived their own life better than the “other” attributed to them; they were quite good at managing Positive and Negative Emotions. Spanish university students represented more positively the elderly people’s QoL than Italian colleagues. A Positive Affect as well as an empathic attitude towards seniors affected a better representation about elderly people’s QoL. Another set of studies was focused on the elderly people’s QoL and New Technologies (NTs) as these may offer opportunities both to maintain an independent lifestyle and to being involved in relevant activities. Most participants had nor any digital skills neither prejudices on the NTs; the perceived QoL was quite positive; Self-Efficacy believes were really high. The QoL was affected only by Self-Efficacy. A workshop was held, involving a small group of both disabled and healthy seniors; it was focused on the NTs, as tools to promote an active citizenship. After Training our seniors improved their Digital Skills and their own Quality of Life. In the end, a study was conducted in order to verify how both empathy (Empatic Concern; Perspective Taking), Theory on Mind (RMET) and contact worked well to improve QoL levels attributed to elders by a group of university students. On an applicative plan, empathy and TOM should represent the backdrop in supervised experiences of contact between students and elders. Further research will be conduct on this path.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Licciardello, O., Mauceri, M., Di Marco, G., & Cardella, M. G. (2016). Journey through “fields” of ageing - from “world of elders” to “worlds of seniors”. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 1(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2016.n2.v1.665
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 2 (2016): PSICO-SOCIO-EMOTIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE AGE: POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGY AND WELFARE IN THE ELDERLY
Section
Articles
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
 
a. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format under the following terms:

 

Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.

NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.

NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.

 
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
 
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
 
The authors are responsible to obtain the appropriate permissions to reproduce material (text, images or graphics) from other publications and to quote their origin correctly.
 

References

Allport, G.W. (1954). The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison Wesley Publishing Company. Tr. it. 1973, La natura del pregiudizio. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.

Baltes, P. B., Staudinger, U. M., & Lindenberger, U., (1999). Lifespan Psychology: Theory and Application to Intellectual Functioning. Annual Review Psychology, 50, 471-507.

Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In R. J. Corsini (Ed.), Encyclopedia of psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 368-369). New York: Wiley.

Baron-Cohen, S. (2001). Theory of mind in normal development and autism. Prisme, 34, 174- 183.

Caprara, G.V., Barbaranelli, C., Borgogni, L., & Steca, P. (2003). Efficacy beliefs as determinants of teachers’ job satisfaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 821-832.

Caprara, G.V. (2005). Le determinanti del benessere nell’arco di vita. Relazione al Convegno “Il Valore dei Valori”, Catania-Enna, 7-8 ottobre 2005.

Cesa-Bianchi, M., & Cristini, C. (2009). Vecchio sarà lei! Muoversi, pensare, comunicare. Napoli: Guida.

Cohen, E. S. (1990). The elderly mystique: Impediment to advocacy and empowerment. Generations: Journal of the American Society on Ageing, 14, 13-16.

Cornman, J. C, Goldman, N., Collins, A. L. (2012). Do adults adjust their socio-economic status identity in later life? Ageing and Society, 32, 4, 616-633.

Cuddy, A. J. C., Norton, M. I., & Fiske, S. T. (2005). This old stereotype: The pervasiveness and persistence of the elderly stereotype. Journal of Social Issues, 61(2), 267-286.

Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 85.

Desrichard, O., & Kopetz, C. (2005). A threat in the elder: The impact of task instructions and selfefficacy on memory performance in the elderly. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(4), 537-552.

Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 2, 276-302.

Fiske, A. P., Kitayama, S., Markus, H. R., & Nisbett, R. E. (1998). The cultural matrix of social psychology. In S. T. Fiske (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2, 4th ed., pp. 915–981). New York: McGraw-Hill.

Horton, S., Baker, J., Pearce, G. W., & Deakin, J. M. (2008). On the malleability of performance:Implications for seniors. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 27, 446-465.

Horton, S., Baker, J., Pearce, W., & Deakin, J. M. (2010). Immunity to Popular Stereotypes of Aging? Seniors and Stereotype Threat. Educational Gerontology, 36, 353-371.

Kahana, E., King, C., Kahana, B., Menne, H., Webster, N., Dan, A., Kercher, K., Bohne, A., Lechner, C. (2004). Successful Aging in the Face of Chronic Disease. In: Wykle, M., Whitehouse, P., Morris, D. (eds.). Successful Aging Through the Life Span Intergenerational Issues in Health. Springer New York: New York, 101-126.

Kidd, D.C., Castano, E. (2013). Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind, Science, 18;342: 377-380.

James, W. (1890). Principles of psichology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Tr.it., Principi di psicologia. Milano: Società Editrice Libraia, 1901.

Levy, B.R. (2003). Mind Matters: Cognitive and Physical Effects of Aging Self-Stereotypes. The Journals of Gerontology, 58(4), 203-211.

Lewin, K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and galileian models of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 5, 141-177. Tr.it. Il conflitto fra una concezione aristotelica ed una concezione galileiana nella psicologia contemporanea. In K., Lewin, Teoria dinamica della personalità (pp. 7-57). Giunti: Firenze, 1965-2010.

Licciardello, O., (1994). Gli strumenti psicosociali nella ricerca e nell’intervento. Franco Angeli: Milano.

Licciardello. Castiglione C., Rampullo A. (2015), “Coping Efficacy and Project Involvement Effects on Personal and Professional Expectations”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 205, 415-421.

Lucas-Carrasco, R. (2012). The WHO quality of life (WHOQOL) questionnaire: Spanish development and validation studies. Quality of Life Research, vol. 21, n.1, 161-165.

Mauceri M. , Di Marco G., Licciardello O. (2012). Action Learning’s effects on special educators’ attitudes towards students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 46, 5698-5702.

Pavot, W., Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1998). The Temporal Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 2, 340-354.

Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R, Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2011). Recent advances in intergroup contact theory. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35, 271-280.

Pettigrew, T. F., Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 922-934.

Premack, D.; Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol 1(4), 515-526.

Rogers, C. & Freiberg, H. J. (1993). Freedom to Learn (3rd edn.), New York: Merrill.

Rosi, A., Cavallini, E., Bottiroli, S., Lecce, S. (2015). Promoting Theory of mind in older adults: does age play a role? Aging and Mental Health, 1(1),1-7.

Siegel P.M., Hodge R.W. (1968), A Causal Approach to the Study of Measurement Error. In: Blalock H.M. Jr., Blalock A.B. (eds.), Methodology in Social Research, (28-59), McGraw-Hill, New York.

Seligman, M.E.P; Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction. American Psychologist, Vol 55(1), 5-14.

Vellante, M., Baron-Cohen, S., Melis, M., & Preti, A. (2012). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” test: Systematic review of psychometric properties and a validation study in Italy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Vol. 18, n.4, 326-354.

Vezzali, L. & Giovannini, D. (2012). Secondary transfer effect of intergroup contact: the role of intergroup attitudes, intergroup anxiety and perspective taking. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 125-144.

Walker, A. (2005). A European perspective on quality of life in old age. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 2-12.

Waterman, A. S. (1993). Two conceptions of happiness: contrasts of personal expressiveness (eudaimonia) and hedonic enjoyment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64 (4), 678-691.

Watson, D. (2002). Positive affectivity: the disposition to experience positive emotional states. In C. R. Snyder & S. J. Loperz, (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology (pp.106-119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wellman, H. M. and Woolley, J. D. 1990: From Simple Desires to Ordinary Beliefs: The Early Development of Everyday Psychology. Cognition, 35, 245-275.

WHOQOL Group (1993). Measuring Quality of Life. World Health Organisation, Geneva.

Wohwill, J.F. (1970). The age variable in psychological research. Psychological Review, 77, 49–64.

Zahava, G., & Bowling, A. (2004). Quality of Life from the perspective of older people. Ageing and Society, 24, 675-691.