Family communication in the victimization of bullying and cyberbullying
Main Article Content
Abstract
Bullying is now out of the school through the technologies of information and communication. For this reason, researchers are now analyzing two phenomena related with peer harassment: bullying and cyberbullying. Several studies have pointed out the importance of family communication in bullying behaviors. Indeed, previous research has shown that open communication between parents and children is a protective factor against victimization in bullying. Research analyzing the influence of family communication in cyberbullying is still scarce, but results from the studies available showed similar resulted than that found in traditional bullying. Our purpose was to analyze the influence of family communication in traditional and internet victimization. We have analyzed this relationship in victims of traditional bullying, victims of cyberbullying and victim of both types of bullying (polivictimization). Data from 1607 secondary schools students from Castilla-la Mancha are presented. Results have confirmed that several students suffered polivictimization although girls were more victimized in both ways than boys. Results have also shown the importance of improving family communication to protect children from victimization and confirmed the influence of the communication problems in victimization processes. The fact that bullying is now going online show us that prevention and intervention efforts has to be directed not only to the schools but also to the family and community. Professionals out of school are needed to work in these two important contexts.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
![Licencia de Creative Commons](https://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Barnes, H.L. y Olson, D.H. (1982). Parent-adolescent Communications scale. En H.D. Olson (ed.), Family inventories: inventories used in a national Surrey of family across the family life cycle (pp. 33-48). St. Paul: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota.
Buist, K.L.L.L., Dekovic, M., Meeus, W. y van Aken, M.A.G. (2004). The reciprocal relationship between early adelescence attrachment and internalizing and externalizing problema behavior. Journal of Adolescence, 27, 251-266.
Cava, M.J., Musitu, G., Buelga, S. y Murgui, S. (2010). The relationships of family and classroom environments with peer relational victimization: An analysis of their gender differences. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 13(1), 156-165.
Estévez, E., Murgui, S., Musitu, G. y Moreno, D. (2008). Clima familiar, clima escolar y satisfacción con la vida en adolescentes. Revista Mexicana de Psicología, 25(1), 119-128.
Estévez A, Villardón L, Calvete E, Padilla P y Orue I. (2011). Adolescentes víctimas de cyberbullying: prevalencia y características. Behavioral Psychology/Psicología Conductual, 18, 73-89.
Hinduja, S. y Patchin, J.W. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129-156.
Juvonen, J. y Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78(9), 496- 505.
Law, D.M., Shapka, J.D. y Olson, B.F. (2010). To control or not to control? Parenting behaviours and adolescent online aggression. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1651-1656.
Loeber, R., Drinkwater, M., Yin, Y., Anderson, S.J., Schmidt, L.C. y Crawford, A. (2000). Stability of family interaction from ages 6 to 18. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 28, 353-369.
MacDonald, C. y Roberts-Pittma, B. (2010). Cyberbullying among college students: prevalence and demographic differences. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 2003-2009.
Mason, K. L. (2008). Cyberbullying: A preliminary assessment for school personnel. Psychology in the Schools, 45(4), 323-348.
Mesh, G.S. (2009). Parental mediation, online activies, and ciberbullying. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 12(4), 387-393.
Musitu, G., Buelga, S., Lila, M. y Cava. M. J. (2001). Familia y adolescencia. Madrid: Síntesis.
Musitu, G., Estévez, E. y Emler, N.P. (2007). Adjustment problems in the family and school contexts, attitude towards authority, and violent behavior at school in adolescence. Adolescence, 42, 779-794.
Patchin, J. W. y Hinduja, S. (2006). Bullies move beyond the schoolyard: A preliminary look at cyberbullying. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 4(2), 148-169.
Povedano, A., Hendry, L.B., Ramos, M.J. y Varela, R. (2011). Victimización escolar: clima familiar, autoestima y satisfacción con la vida desde una perspectiva de género. Psychosocial Intervention, 20(1), 5-12.
Raskauskas, J. y Stolz, A. D. (2007). Involvement in traditional and electronic bullying among adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 43(3), 564-575.
Rigby, K. y Bagshaw, D. (2003). Prospects of Adolescent Students collaborating with teachers in addressing issues of bullying and conflict in schools. Educational Psychology, 23, 535-546.
Smith, P. K., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S, y Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in Secondary school pupils. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 49(4), 376-385.
Smith, P., Mahdavi, J., Carvalho, M., Fisher, S., Russell, S. y Tippett, N. (2008). Cyberbullying: Its nature and impact in secondary school pupils. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 376–385.
Sontag, L., Clemans, K., Graber, J. y Lyndon, S. (2011) Traditional and cyber aggressors and victims: A comparison of psychosocial characteristics. Journal Youth Adolescence, 40, 392–404.
Sourander, A., Brunstein Klomek, A., Ikonen, M., Lindroos, J., Luntamo, T., Koskelainen, M., . .. Helenius, H. (2010). Psychosocial risk factors associated with cyberbullying among adolescents: A population-based study. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67(7), 720-728.
Subrahmanyam, K., Smahel, D. y Greenfield, P. (2006). Connecting developmental constructions to the Internet: Identity presentation and sexual exploration in online teen chat rooms. Developmental Psychology, 42(3), 395-406.
Tokunaka, R. S. (2010). Following you home from school: A critical review and synthesis of research on cyberbullying victimization. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 277-287.
Twyman, K., Saylor, C., Taylor, L.A. y Comeaux, C. (2010). Comparing children and adolescents engaged in cyberbullying to matched peers. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 195-199.
Wang, J., Lannotti, R.J. y Nansel, T.R. (2009). School bullying among adolescents in the United States: Psysical, verbal, relational, and cyber. Journal of Adolescents Health, 45(4), 368-375.
Ybarra, M.L. y Mitchell, K.J. (2004). Online aggressor/targets, aggressors, and targets: a comparison of associated youth characteristics. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(7), 1308-1316.
Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E., Navarro, R. y Ovejero, A. (2012). Family communication and cyberbullying: A study with victims and their parents. Comunicación presentada en International Conference on Cyberbullying, 28-29 junio, París.
Yubero, S., Larrañaga, E. y Martínez, M. I. (2013). Familia, comunicación y conductas de acoso. En A. Ovejero, P. K. Smith y S. Yubero (Coords.), El acoso escolar y su prevención: Perspectivas internacionales (pp. 207-223). Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva.