Teaching styles and self-efficay in primary school teachers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the relationship between self-perceived competence dimensions of Primary School teachers in Spain and their level of self-efficacy. A sample of N = 40 teachers in Castilla y León area of this educational level, answered two Likert self-rating scales: the ECAD-EP (Valdivieso, Carbonero and Martín-Antón, 2013) for the measurement of teaching style with three dimensions (a. Social and Emotional , b. Communicative and Relationship and c. Instructional) and the test Teacher Sense of Efficacy Scale –TSES-(Tschannen -Moran and Woolfolk , 2001) for the self-efficacy assessment. The process of data analysis focused on descriptive statistical calculations, bivariate correlation and linear regression. The results showed that the socialemotional factor has a significant linear correlation (r=.623) with self-efficacy dimension and it explains a 48.90% variance. Thus we can say that in the teacher training process it is necessary to include emotional skills in order to improve their effectiveness in the teaching.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10-20.
Ashton, P. T. y Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference. Teachers´ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
Carbonero, M. A., Ortiz, E. Martín-Antón, L. J., y Valdivieso, J. A. (2010). Identificación de las variables docentes moduladoras del profesorado eficaz en Secundaria. Aula Abierta, 38(1),15-24.
Carbonero, M. A., Román, J. M., Martín-Antón, L. J., y Reoyo, N. (2009). Efecto del programa de habilidades docentes motivadoras en el profesorado de secundaria. Revista de psicodidáctica, 14(2), 229-244.
Cohen-Vogel, L. y Smith, T.M. (2007). Qualifications and assignments of alternatively certified teachers: Testing core assumptions. American Educational Research Journal. 44 (3), 732-753. Florida State University. Tallahassee, Florida.
Danielson, Ch.y McGreal, T.L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision & Curriculum Development.
Elizalde, L. y Reyes, R. (2008). Elementos clave para la evaluación del desempeño de los docentes. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa. Número especial. Recuperado de: http://redie.uabc.mx/NumEsp1/contenido-elizaldereyes.html (el 24 de junio de 2010).
García Ramos, J.M. y Congosto Luna, E. (2000). “Evaluación y calidad del profesorado”. En T. González Ramírez (Ed.). Evaluación y gestión de la calidad educativa. Un enfoque metodológico. (Pp. 127-157). Málaga: Aljibe.
Hanif, R. (2004). Teacher Stress, Job Performance, and Self-efficacy of Women School Teachers. Unpublished PHD. Dissertation of Quaid-eAzam University, Islamabad.
Korthagen, F.A.J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and teacher education. 20, 77-97.
Koster, B.; Brekelmans, M.; Korthagen, F.; y Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21,157–176.
Marrero, J. (1993). Las teorías implícitas del profesorado: vínculo entre la cultura y la práctica de la enseñanza; en M.J. Rodrigo, A. Rodríguez y J. Marrero (Eds.), Las teorías implícitas: una aproximación al conocimiento cotidiano. Madrid: Visor. (Pp. 243-276).
Martín-Antón, L. J., Carbonero, M. A., y Román, J. M. (2012). Efecto modulador de variables socioemocionales en el entrenamiento en estrategias de elaboración en Educacion Secundaria Obligatoria (ESO): paráfrasis y aplicaciones. Psicothema, 24(1), 35-41.
Mohan, L.; Lundeberg, M. A. y Reffitt, K. (2008). Studying teachers and schools: Michael Pressley´s legacy and directions for future research. Educational Psychologist. 43 (2), 107-118. Michigan State University.
Moore, W. y Esselman, M. (1992). Teacher efficacy, power, school climate and achievement: a desegregating district´s experience. Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association. San Francisco.
Onafowora, L. L. (2005). Teacher efficacy issues in the practice of novice teachers. Educational Research Quarterly, 28, 34-43
Parkay, F., y otros (1998). A study of the relationship among teacher efficacy, locus of control and stress. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 21 (4), pp. 13-22.
Pecheone, R.L. y Chung, R.R. (2006). Evidence in teacher education. The Performance Assessment for California Teachers (PACT). Journal of Teacher Education. 57 (1), 22-36. Universidad de Stanford.
Pozo, J.I. y Scheuer N. (1999). Las concepciones sobre el aprendizaje como teorías implícitas. En J. I. Pozo y C. Monereo (Eds.), El aprendizaje estratégico (87-108). Madrid: Santillana.
Pozuelo, I. (1997). La formación teórico-práctica y didáctico-científica del profesorado en los niveles de enseñanza primaria, fundamentada en los factores psico-sociopedagógicos. Revista Electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado. 1 (0). Recuperado de http://www.uva.es/aufop/publica/actas/viii/edprima.htm (el 30 de marzo de 2009).
Ross, J.A. (1992). Teacher efficacy and the effect of coaching on student achievement. Canadian journal of education, 17 (1), pp. 51-65.
Shidler, L. (2009). The impact of time spent coaching for teacher efficacy on student achievement. Early Childhood Education Journal, 36(5), 453-460.
Tam, K. P.; Pak, S. T.; Hui, C. H.; Kwan, S. O. y Goh, M. K. H. (2010). Implicit person theories and chane in teacher evaluation: A longitudinal field study. Journal of applied social psychology. 40 (2), 273-286. Universidad de Hong Kong.
Tschannen-Moran, M. y Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers´self-efficacy beliefs: potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 751-761.
Tschannen-Moran, M. y Woolfolk, A. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teaching end Teacher Education, 17: 783-805.
Valdivieso, J. A.; Carbonero, M. A. y Martín, L. J. (2013). La competencia docente autopercibida del profesorado de Educación Primaria: un nuevo cuestionario para su medida. Revista de Psicodidáctica, 18(1), 47-78.
Wolters, C. A. y Daughterty, S. G. (2007). Goal structures and teachers`sense of eficacy: their relation and association to teaching experience and academic level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(11), 181-193.
Yu, S. y Ding, R. J. (2009). Multi-level Fuzzy Assessment Application in Teaching Evaluation. ICAIE 2009: Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Education. Vols. 1-2, 94-98. Huazhong Normal Univ. China Assoc Educ. Technol.