Prioritizing the competence learning to learn in the programs and didactic units

Main Article Content

Luis Toribio Briñas

Abstract

Basic assembly to capture on curriculum design and development Skills, the Learning to Learn is essential for several reasons: first, because the educational paradigm of Lifelong Learning which enshrines the European Union, requires citizens to be suitable for acquiring an ever changing , available at various sources of information, especially that provided by virtual environments, and the ability to apply and use it indifferent contexts , knowledge being in a professional environment where they are going to make clear the acquisition that power. Moreover, this competition covers and covers a wide range of areas, dimensions and indicators of other skills that are essential, the Autonomous Learning goes beyond the cognitive aspects , having special relevance the emotional, something that becomes even more apparent given the interrelated and inclusiveness that characterizes the Basic Skills.
The European Higher Education promotes a type of learning in more autonomous and flexible student who required him, among other things, but as a priority , knowledge , control and application of cognitive and emotional factors brought into play during the learning processes. In this paper , we begin by defining the concept and the basic guidelines of this competition lines from psychological approaches that deal with the Meta Cognition, until the underlying socioeconomic and sociopolitical fonts in documents and OECD guidelines (draft DESECO), European Union (program working groups 2010 and 2020), or the Ministry of Education itself . The core of this paper consists in selecting a set of fields , dimensions , sub - dimensions and indicators of competency assessment to learning that will help teachers to design and develop their Schedules and teaching units in forms of Assessment Objectives and Indicators . We end by outlining what the best organizational strategies at plant level , methodological classroom level and individual as well as the different types of activities , materials and resources (as we saw in the seven modules and eight) that are better suited for work this important competition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Toribio Briñas, L. (2014). Prioritizing the competence learning to learn in the programs and didactic units. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 7(1), 131–140. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v7.784
Section
Articles

References

ARREAZA BERBERIDE, F, GÓMEZ-PIMPOLLO MORALES, N., y PÉREZ PINTADO, M (2009): Evaluación de Diagnóstico de las Competencias Básicas en Castilla la Mancha, 2009-2011. Marco Teórico (Toledo, Oficina de Evaluación de la Consejería de Educación de Castilla la Mancha).

ALONSO TAPIA, J. (1997): Motivar para el aprendizaje. Teoría y Estrategias (Madrid, EDEBE, Colección Innova).

BURÓN OREJAS, J. (1996): Enseñara a Aprender. Introducción a la Meta cognición (Bilbao, MENSAJERO, colección Recursos e instrumentos psicopedagógicos).

GÓMEZ P.C., GARCÍA A., y ALONSO P. (1991): Manual de Técnicas de Trabajo Intelectual. Procedimientos para aprender a aprender. Programa de Técnicas de Trabajo Intelectual (Madrid, EOS, Segunda Edición).

MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN Y CIENCIA DE ESPAÑA (2006-A): Real Decreto de Enseñanzas Mínimas 1513/2006, de 7 de Diciembre por el que se establece las enseñanzas mínimas para Educación Primaria (Madrid, Boletín Oficial del Estado).

MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN Y CIENCIA DE ESPAÑA (2006-B): Real Decreto de Enseñanzas Mínimas 1631/2006, de 29 de Diciembre por el que se establece las enseñanzas mínimas para Educación Primaria (Madrid, Boletín Oficial del Estado).

MIRANDA CASAS, A. (1996): Introducción a las dificultades en el aprendizaje (Valencia, PROMOLIBRO, 2ª edición).

OCDE (2005): La definición y selección de competencias clave. Resumen ejecutivo. En www.OECD.org/edu/statistics/deseco Consultado el 12 de Abril de 2010.