Dialogical study on the development of teaching and learning in university teacher identity
Main Article Content
Abstract
The construction of the self implies a selection and internalization of convincing voices. Thus, investigating the development of teaching and learning from a dialogic perspective implies attending discursive polyphony inherent in teacher identity. We interviewed two professors from the same university career in order to explore what voices / positions and personal innovations unfold when they talk about teaching and learning at university. The results show that both teachers were associated with a different set of voices and innovations: movements from positions focused other-voices to positions with a greater degree of integration between other-voices and self-voices as well as movements from innovations observable actions-centered like protests and actions to innovations mental actions- centered such as reflections and reconceptualizations. Hence, we show two ways of internalizing the agency in teaching and learning: (a) from an external agency, observable to an internal, mental agency; (b) from an external management of learning, carried out by others, to an internal management, in which the learner himself must assume the management of his own learning processes. Educational implications are discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Arvaja, M. (2016). Building teacher identity through the process of positioning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 392-402. Doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.024
Aveling, E., Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2015). A qualitative method for analysing multivoicedness. Qualitative Research, 15, 670–687. doi:10.1177/1468794114557991
Castro, C., Gonçalves, M., & Valsiner, J. (2011). Transforming self – narratives in psychotherapy: looking at different forms of ambivalence in the change process. In R. Jones & M. Morioka (Eds.), Jungian and Dialogical Self Perspectives (pp.43–66). Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Crivisqui, E. (1993). Análisis Factorial de Correspondencias. Un instrumento de investigación en ciencias sociales. Asunción: Laboratorio de Informática Social de la Universidad Católica de Asunción.
Dillon, L. (2012). Email as an arena for authoring a dialogical self among gifted young adolescents: A qualitative study. International Journal for Dialogical Science, 6, 1-33.
Flick, U. (2000). Introducción a la investigación cualitativa. Madrid: Morata.
Freire, S., & Branco, A. (2016). O self dialógico em desenvolvimento: um estudo sobre as concepções dinâmicas de si em crianças. Psicol. USP, 27, 168-177. Doi: 10.1590/0103-6564D20160001.
Gonçalves, M., & Ribeiro, A. (2012). Narrative processes of innovation and stability within the dialogical self. In H. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds), Handbook of Dialogical Self Theory (pp.301–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Gow, L., & Kember, D. (1993). Conceptions of teaching and their relationship to student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 20–23. Doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1993.tb01039.x
Grossen, M. (2010). Interaction analysis and psychology: a dialogical perspective. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 44, 1–22. Doi: 10.1007/s12124-009-9108-9
Grossen, M., & Salazar-Orvig, A. (2011). Dialogism and dialogicality in the study of the self. Culture & Psychology, 17, 491–509. Doi: 10.1177/1354067X11418541
Grossen. M., Zittoun, T., & Ros, J. (2012). Boundary crossing events and potential appropriation space in philosophy, literature and general knowledge. In E. Hjörne et al. (Eds), Learning, Social Interaction and Diversity: Exploring Identities in School Practices (pp.15-33). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Guzzardo, M., Todorova, I., Adams, W., & Falcón, L. (2016). “Half Here, Half There”: Dialogical Selves Among Older Puerto Ricans of the Diaspora. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 29, 51-65. Doi: 10.1080/10720537.2015.1016640
James, W. (1890). Principles of Psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Krotofil, J. (2013). Religion, Migration, and the Dialogical Self: New Application of the Personal Position Repertoire Method. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 26, 90–103. Doi: 10.1080/10720537.2013.75902
Linell, P. (2009). Rethinking Language, Mind, and World Dialogically: Interactional and Contextual Theories of Human Sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
McNaughton, S., & Billot, J. (2016). Negotiating academic teacher identity shifts during higher education contextual change. Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 644-658. Doi: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1163669
Medina, L. (2014). How to access the conceptions and theories that underlie teaching practices? A theoretical-methodological reflection based on dialogic discourse analysis / ¿Cómo acceder a las concepciones y teorías que subyacen a las prácticas docentes? Una reflexión teórico-metodológica desde el Análisis dialógico de los discursos. Cultura y Educación: Culture and Education, 26, 603-616. Doi: 10.1080/11356405.2014.965448
Montero, I., & León, O. (2007). A guide for naming research studies in Psychology. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 7, 847–862.
Pozo, J.I. (2014). Psicología del aprendizaje humano. Adquisición de conocimiento y cambio personal. Madrid: Morata.
Ventura, A. C. (en prensa). Un estudio de casos sobre la identidad de profesores universitarios en situación de clase y de entrevista. Infancia y Aprendizaje. Journal for the Study of Education and Development.