The 3p and dedepro models as research heuristic
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Аннотация
There are different heuristics that study the teaching-learning process; in this investigation we will explore the confluence of Biggs’ 3P model and the DEDEPRO model. These two complementary models offer us a framework for the analysis of teaching-learning situations with greater specificity and a better understanding of the structure of the research studies and the variables they study. In this manner, by incorporating both the general processes of teaching and learning, as well as the specific variables that are related to them, more or less analytical studies can be developed. Biggs adopted the 3P model to represent the student’s perspective in the teaching-learning process. The ways students learn are explained through the interaction of three moments in time that become the components for which the model is named: 1) Presage, where we find student characteristics and characteristics of the learning context; 2) Process, referring to the way that learning tasks are undertaken; and 3) Product, which includes learning outcomes. All the components that make up this model (Presage-Process-Product) tend toward equilibrium, and a change in any of them affects the system as a whole. In complementary fashion, the DEDEPRO model has established the need to further specify, within the Biggs model, the moments of Design (planning), Development (execution) and Product (satisfaction and performance), in terms of both teaching and learning. The DEDEPRO model assumes personal self-regulation, and is interactive with regulation in teaching, thereby giving rise to different levels of performance and personal satisfaction. In an overall sense, both models give us the opportunity to organize our variables over the teaching-learning process. We would emphasize the joint structure of the two models in relation to the variables in this study: Personal self-regulation, Stressful context (Presage); Learning approaches, Coping strategies, Self-regulated learning and Regulatory teaching (Process-Development); and Performance and Satisfaction with the learning process (Product).
Скачивания
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes:
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato bajo los siguientes términos: —se debe dar crédito de manera adecuada, brindar un enlace a la licencia, e indicar si se han realizado cambios. Puede hacerlo en cualquier forma razonable, pero no de forma tal que sugiera que usted o su uso tienen el apoyo de la licenciante (Atribución); — no se puede hacer uso del material con propósitos comerciales (No Comercial); — si se remezcla, transforma o crea a partir del material, no podrá distribuirse el material modificado (Sin Derivadas).
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).
Este obra está bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional.
Библиографические ссылки
Biggs, J.B. (1985).The role of meta-learning in study processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185-212.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Student Approaches to Learning and Studying. Research. Monograph. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students´ learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3-19.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Biggs, J. (2001). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3rd Ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Biggs, J. (2005). Calidad del aprendizaje universitario. [Quality of University Learning]. Madrid: Narcea.
De la Fuente, J. (2001). Regulación de la enseñanza y autorregulación del aprendizaje en niveles no universitarios. [Regulation of teaching and self-regulated learning at non-university levels.] Unpublished manuscript.
De la Fuente, J. (2011). Implications for the DEDEPRO Model for Interactive Analysis of the Teaching-Learning Process in Higher Education. In R. Teixeira (Ed.), Higher Education in a State of Crisis (pp. 205-222). New York: Nova Science Publisher.
De la Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2000). EEPEA. Escalas para la Evaluación del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje en Contextos Educativos. [ATLP. Scales for Assessing the Teaching-Learning Process in Educational Contexts.] Almería: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Almería.
De la Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2003). Regulación de la enseñanza para la autorregulación del aprendizaje en la Universidad. [Regulation of teaching for self-regulated learning at the University]. Aula Abierta, 82, 161-171.
De la Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2007). The DEDEPRO model for regulating teaching and learning: recent advances. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 13(5), 535-564.
De la Fuente, J., & Justicia, F. (2010). The DEDEPRO Model of Regulated Teaching and Learning: recent advances. In J. De la Fuente & M.A. Eissa (Eds.), International Handbook of applying selfregulated learning in different settings (pp. 77-100). Almería: E-Publishing series I+D+i.
De la Fuente, J., Justicia, F., & Berbén, A.B.G. (2006). An interactive model of regulated teaching and self-regulated learning. International Journal of Learning, 12(7), 217-225.
De la Fuente, J., Justicia, F., Cano, F., Sander, P., Martínez-Vicente, J.M. & Pichardo, M.C. (2003). Mejora de la autorregulación del aprendizaje, en estudiantes universitarios, a través de estrategias de enseñanza reguladora on-line. [Improving self-regulated learning in university students through online regulatory teaching strategies.] R&D Project ref. BSO2003-6493/PSCE.
De la Fuente, J., Justicia, F., Casanova, P., & Trianes, M.V. (2004). Perception about construction of academic and professional competences in psychologists. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 3(1), 33-34.
De la Fuente, J., & Martínez, J. M. (2004). Escala para la Evaluación Interactiva del Proceso de Enseñanza-Aprendizaje, EIPEA. [Scale for the Interactive Assessment of the Teaching-Learning Process, IATLP.] Madrid: EOS.
Elliot, A.J., & Dweck, C.S. (2007). Handbook of Competence and Motivation. New York: Guilford University Press.
Entwistle, N.J., & Peterson, E.R. (2004). Conceptions of learning and knowledge in higher education: relationships with study behavior and influences of learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 41(3), 516-623.
Férnandez, E., & Fernández, M. (2006). El Espacio Europeo de Educación Superior. [The European Higher Education Area.] In J.L. Benítez, A.B.G. Berbén, F. Justicia, and J. De la Fuente (Coords.), La universidad ante el reto del espacio europeo de educación superior: investigación reciente (pp. 17-47). Madrid: EOS.
Justicia, F., De la Fuente, J. & Berbén, A.B.G (2007). El aprendiz experto y la autorregulación del aprendizaje. [The expert learner and self-regulated learning] In F. Justicia, M.C. Pichardo y E. Fernández (Eds.), Enciclopedia de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación (pp.509-532). Archidona (Málaga): Aljibe.
Lonka, K., Olkinuora, E., and Mäkinen, J. (2004) Aspects and prospects of measuring studying and learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 4, 301–324.
Pintrich, P.R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16(4), 385-407.
Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (1999). Understanding Learning and Teaching. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Vermunt, J.D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 149-171.
Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257-280.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boerkaerts, P.R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp.13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: an overview. Theory into practice, 41 (2), 64-70.
Zimmerman, B.J., Greenberg, D., & Winstein, C.E. (1994). Self-regulation academic study time: a strategy approach. In D.H. Schunk & B.J. Zimmerman (Ed.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: issue and educational applications (pp. 181-199). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Kintsantas, A. (1997). Developmental phases in self-regulation: Shifting from process goals to outcome goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 54-59.