Childhood pedagogy: learning with bruner

Main Article Content

Cristina Mesquita

Abstract

The scientific literature has shown that participatory approaches that guarantee the child rights and respect their voice and competence have greater impact on their learning and future life (Eurydice, 2009; OCDE, 2012; Oliveira-Formosinho, 2009; Siraj-Blatchford, Sylva, Muttock, Gilden and Bell, 2002). The Starting Strong III Report (OCDE, 2012) to this purpose, emphasizes that children learn better: i) on integrative pedagogical approaches, where cognitive and social learning are understood as complementary and equally important, ii) when they are active and involved; iii) when the interactions are frequent and meaningful; iv) when the curriculum takes into account what they have learned before. The complexity of participatory pedagogy requires a holistic view of the processes to be operationalized in praxis. Our concerns with a participatory praxis led us to dialogue with the Bruner proposals (1966, 1984a; 1991a; 1991b; 1997; 1998; 2000; 2004; 2010; Bruner and Postman, 1949; Wood, Bruner, and Ross, 1976) whose principles provide important contributions to childhood pedagogy. Participatory pedagogy brings out the integrative vision of praxis and considers the complexity of the contexts where the beliefs, knowledge, theory and practice are held in multiple combinations. This vision values the child activity and competence, valuing the involvement stemming from the meaningful experiences. The Bruner’cultural pedagogy is an important grammar for participatory praxis. In this study we intend to read the conceptions of Bruner, taking into account its implications in early childhood education. The analysis will be based on the dimensions of childhood pedagogy listed by Oliveira Formosinho (2007) space and materials, time, interactions, observation, planning and assessment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Mesquita, C. (2014). Childhood pedagogy: learning with bruner. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology. Revista INFAD De Psicología., 3(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2014.n1.v3.480
Section
Articles

References

Bruner, J. (1966). The growth of mind. Ocasional Paper, nº 8. Washington D.C.: Educational Services, Inc., Cambridge, Mass, National Science Foundation.

Bruner, J. (1984a). Acción, pensamiento y lenguaje. Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984b). El linguage de la educación. In J. Bruner, Acción, Pensamiento e lenguaje (pp. 197-208). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984c). El desarrollo de los processos de representación. In J. Bruner, Acción, pensamiento y lenguage (pp. 119-128). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984d). La inmadurez: su naturaleza y usos. In J. Bruner, Acción, Pensamiento y lenguaje (pp. 45-74). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984e). La intencion en la estrutura de la acción y la interacion. In J. Bruner, Acción, Pensamiento e Lenguaje (pp. 101-115). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984f). Juego, pensamiento y lenguaje. In J. Bruner, Acción, pensamiento y lenguage (pp. 211-219). Madrid: Alianza Psicología.

Bruner, J. (1984g). Origenes de las estrategias para la resolución de problemas. In J. Bruner, Acción, Pensamiento y lenguage (pp. 129-147). Madrid: Alianza.

Bruner, J. (1991a). The Narrative Construction of Reality. Critical Inquiry, 18, 1-20.

Bruner, J. (1991b). Self-Making and World-Making. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 25: 1, 67-78.

Bruner, J. (1997). Actos de Significado: para uma psicologia cultural. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Bruner, J. (1998). O Processo da Educação. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Bruner, J. (2000). Cultura da Educação. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Bruner, J. (2004). Life as Narrative. Social Research, 71: 3, 691-710.

Bruner, J. (2010). Realidad mental y mundos posibles. Bracelona: gedisa.

Bruner, J. S. & Postman, L. (1949). On the Perception of Incongruity: A Paradigm. Journal of Personality, 18, 206-223.

Eurydice (2009). Early Childhood Education and Care in Europe: Tackling Social and Cultural Inequalities. UE: Eurydice.

Kishimoto, T. M. (2007). Brincadeiras e Narrativas infantis: contribuições de J. Bruner para a pedagogia da Infância. In J. Oliveira-Formosinh, T. M. Kishimoto & M. A. Pinazza, Pedagogia(s) da Infância: dialogando com o passado, construindo o futuro (pp. 249-275). Porto Alegre: Artmed.

OCDE (2012). Starting Strong III. Paris: OCDE Publications.

Oliveira-Formosinho, J. (2007). Pedagogia da Infância: Reconstruído uma Práxis de Participação. In J. Oliveira-Formosinho, D. Lino & S. Niza, Modelos Curriculares para a Educação de Infância: Construindo uma práxis de participação (pp. 13-42). Porto: Porto Editora.

Oliveira-Formosinho, J. (2009). Togetherness and play under the same roof: Children’s perceptions about families. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 17(2), 233-248.

Siraj-Blatchford, I., Sylva, K., Muttock, S., Gilden, R. & Bell, D. (2002). Researching Effective Pedagogy in the Early Years. London: Department of education and skills.

Smidt, S. (2011). Introducing Bruner: a guide for practitioners and students in early years education. London: Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. (1991). A Formação Social da Mente. São Paulo : Martins Fontes.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, vol 17, 86-100.