The tutor of the degree dissertation: new challenges for the professor of university
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the present article is to present some reflections regarding the professor of university as tutor of the Degree Dissertation. Some ideas are presented in order to improve professors’ performance when helping university students to carry out the Degree Dissertation. First of all, some suggestions are presented regarding the profile of the Degree Dissertation tutor. Following, there are some approaches stemming from activities related to work contexts, such as empowerment, coaching or mentoring, these activities are clearly relevant in the university educational context. Finally, some suggestions are presented regarding the self-regulated learning.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Boyatzis, R. E., Cowen, S. S., Kolb, D. A., y Associates (1995). Innovation in professional education: Steps on a journey to learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The Change Masters. New York: Simon y Schuster.
Koster, B., Brekelmans, M., Korthagen, F., y Wubbels, T. (2005). Quality requirements for teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 157-176.
Mullen, C. A. (2011). Facilitating self-regulated learning using mentoring approaches with doctoral students. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 137-152). New York: Routledge.
Palmer, S., y Whybrow, A. (2008). Handbook of coaching psychology. New York: Routledge.
Race, P., Brown, S., y Simth, B. (2005). 500 Tips on Assessment. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge. RESOLUCIÓN de 11 de abril de 2013, del Rector de la Universidad de Valladolid, por la que se acuerda la publicación del reglamento sobre la elaboración y evaluación del trabajo de fin de grado.
Rogers, C. R. (1951). Client-centered Therapy: Its current practice, implications and theory. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Rogers, C. R. (1961). On becoming a person. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Rushton, S., Morgan, J., y Richard, M. (2007). Teacher’s Myers-Briggs personality profiles: Identifying effective teacher personality traits. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 432-441.
Schunk, D. H., y Usher, E. L. (2011). Assessing self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 282-297). New York: Routledge.
Sternberg, R. J. (2007). Intelligence, competence, and expertise. En A. J. Elliot y C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 15-30). New York: Guilford.
Winne, P. H. (2011). A cognitive and metacognitive analysis of self-regulated learning. En B. J. Zimmerman y D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 15-32). New York: Routledge.
Wiswall, M. (2013). The dynamics of teacher quality. Journal of Public Economics, 100, 61-78.
Yeh, S. S. (2009). The cost-effectiveness of raising teacher quality. Educational Research Review, 4, 220-232.