Implications for teacher training: effectiveness beliefs from secondary teachers
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Taking as starting point the current educational situation and the results of the PISA reports, which for years underline the high dropout rates and poor academic performance and motivation of our students, whenever you begin to place more emphasis on the importance of effective teaching. More and more is expected of the faculty, which requires that they have received appropriate training, a good intellectual preparation for their work and vocation recycling and continuous adaptation to new learning contexts. Specifically, this pilot study will try to offer an empirical analysis and reflection on the current profile of the effective teacher of Secondary Education, from the perspective of teachers themselves. Sample of teachers of Castilla y León both public schools and concluded.
Downloads
Article Details
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
References
Abrami, P.C. y Apollonia (1990) . The dimensionality of ratings and their use in personnel decisions. In M. Theall, & J. Franklin (Eds.)
Aleamoni, L.M. (1981). Students ratings of instruction. In J. Millman (De.) Handbook of teacher evaluation (pp. 110-145). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
Ary, D. Jacobs, L y Razavieh, A. (1989). Introducción a la Investigación Pedagógica. Segunda edición. México. Mcgraw-Hill
Coleman, J. S. et. al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. U. S. Department of H. E. W., Office of Education, Washington, D. C.
Braskamp, L.A., y Ory, J.C. (1994). Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing individual and instructional performance. San Francisco: Josey Bass.
Cashin, W. E. (1988). Student ratings of teaching: A summary of the Research IDEA paper No. 20 Manhattan, Kansas State University, Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development.
Centra, J. A. (1993). Reflective faculty evaluation: Enhancing teaching and determining faculty effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Cohen, P. A. (1981). Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research
Feldman, K. A. (1976). Grades and College students evaluations of their courses and teachers. Research in Higher Education, 4,69-111
Feldman, K. A. (1989) Instructional effectiveness of college teachers as judged by teachers themselves, current and former students, colleagues, administrators and external (neutral) observer Research in Higher Education, 30, 137-194
Jencks, C. S. et. al. (1972). Inequality: a reassessment of the effect of family and schooling in America. Nueva York: Basic Books.
Isaac, S., y Michael, W. B. (1971). Handbook in research and evaluation. San Diego: Edits.
OECD (1995). Schools under scrutiny. Head of Publication Service, París.
Marsh, H. W., y Dunkin, M. (1992). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J.C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook on theory and research (Vol. 8, pp. 143-234). New York: Agathon Press.
Scheerens,J. y Creemers, B.P.M. (1989). Conceptualizing School Effectiveness, International Journal of Educational Research. 13 (7), 691-706.
Webster, W. J., Mendro, R. L. y Almaguer, T. O. (1994). Effectiveness Indices: A “Value Added” approach to measuring school effect, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 20, 113-145.